CFP
HOME HELP CONTACT US FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Can Fam Physician
Vol. 53, No. 7, July 2007, pp.1169 - 1175
Copyright © 2007 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Right arrow Articles by Asch, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banerjee, S.
Right arrow Articles by Asch, M. R.

Clinical Review

Back stab

Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe back pain

Susitna Banerjee
Medical student in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Ottawa in Ontario

Mark Otto Baerlocher, MD
Resident in the Radiology Program at the University of Toronto in Ontario

Murray R. Asch, MD FRCPC
Director of Interventional Radiology at the Lakeridge Health Corporation in Oshawa, Ont

Correspondence to: Susitna Banerjee, 47 Great Oak Private, Ottawa, ON K1G 6P7; telephone 613 733-4364; e-mailsbane059{at}uottawa.ca

OBJECTIVE To review the evidence supporting use of percutaneous vertebroplasty for relief of pain and mechanical stability in patients with vertebral compression fractures unrelieved by conventional measures.

QUALITY OF EVIDENCE Ovid MEDLINE was searched from January 1966 to December2006 for all English-language papers on vertebroplasty. The quality of evidence in these papers was graded according to the 4-point classification system of evidence-based medicine. Level II evidence currently supports use of vertebroplasty.

MAIN MESSAGE Vertebroplasty alleviates pain from vertebral compression fractures that result from osteoporosis, hemangiomas, malignancies, and vertebral osteonecrosis. Vertebroplasty has provided substantial pain relief in 60% to 100% of patients; has decreasedanalgesic use in 34% to 91% of patients; and has improved physical mobility in 29% to 100% of patients. Contraindications to vertebroplasty include asymptomatic compression fractures of the vertebral body, vertebra plana, retropulsed bone fragments or tumours, active infection, uncorrectable coagulopathy, allergy to the bone cement or opacification agent, severe cardiopulmonary disease, pregnancy, and pre-existing radiculopathy. The short-term complication rate was found to be 0.5% to 54%. Rare but serious complications include compression of the spinal cord or nerve root, infection, cement embolization causing pulmonary infarct and clinical symptoms, paradoxical embolization of the cerebral artery, and severe hematomas.

CONCLUSION Vertebroplasty is a safe and effective treatment for vertebral fractures that cannot be treated using conservative measures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
cfpHome page
J. O'Brien, M. O. Baerlocher, M. Asch, and A. Myers
Role of radiology in geriatric care: A primer for family physicians
Can Fam Physician, January 1, 2009; 55(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SEARCH
Copyright © 2007 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada.