|
|
Vol. 53, No. 11, November 2007, p.1886 Copyright © 2007 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada
ResponseShelley R. Salpeter, MD FACPSan Jose, Calif, by e-mail I appreciate the comments of Dr Anthony DUrzo concerning the recent debate on the safety of β-agonist use in chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD).1 I will respond to his comments here, but first I would like to point out that Dr DUrzo has consultant arrangements with the pharmaceutical firms AstraZeneca and Novartis, has received grant support from AstraZeneca, and is on the speakers bureau for Schering-Plough.2 It is possible that Dr DUrzos comments are tempered by a serious bias toward promoting long-acting β-agonist use, especially that of formoterol, the long-acting β-agonist made by these companies. As Dr DUrzo pointed out, my recent analysis of β-agonist use in COPD3 did not include the TORCH study,4 but this is because it had not been published at that time. As I discussed in the debate rebuttal, this trial also showed an increase in respiratory deaths for β-agonist use compared with placebo, although it was not statistically significant. It is true that the TORCH trial found an 18% reduction in hospitalizations due to COPD,4 while previous studies found no reduction in COPD hospitalizations with β-agonist use.3 This is consistent with the evidence that β-agonists improve COPD symptoms but might increase respiratory mortality compared with placebo. It is important to compare these results with those of anticholinergic agents, which have been shown to reduce hospitalizations by 33% and respiratory mortality by 73%, compared with placebo.3 Another published analysis evaluated long-acting β-agonists in asthma and found a similar increase in respiratory mortality compared with placebo.5 This adverse effect of β-agonists in obstructive lung disease is thought to be due, in part, to tolerance that develops to β-agonist use over time, although I agree with Dr DUrzo that other factors might be involved.6 As Dr DUrzo points out, the FACET trial7 was not included in my previous analysis, but that is because it was not a placebo-controlled trial. He also suggests that these safety concerns in asthma have centred on salmeterol and not formoterol, but pooled trial data have found a significant and equal increase in asthma hospitalizations for both formoterol and salmeterol, compared with placebo.5 Dr DUrzo is worried that my arguments are not supported by the best available evidence because my literature review is not comprehensive and that this might introduce a serious bias. He suggests that my review might "serve only to confuse family physicians who are far too busy looking after patients to carry out comprehensive literature searches of their own." A full literature review was not possible in this short position statement, but I would like to assure the readers that my meta-analyses have included all of the randomized placebo-controlled trials that were available when the reviews were completed. The fact that Canadian Family Physician invited a debate on whether β-agonists should be avoided in COPD should alert readers that there might be some serious concerns about their safety. I myself am a practising general internist caring for patients with COPD, and I have no ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I personally use anticholinergic agents instead of β-agonists as the bronchodilator of choice in the treatment of these patients.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||