CFP
HOME HELP CONTACT US FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Can Fam Physician
Vol. 53, No. 6, June 2007, pp.983 - 985
Copyright © 2007 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spano, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spano, L. J.

Commentary

A terrible beauty

A physician’s story of ovarian cancer

Linda J. Spano, BScN MD MHSc CCFP
Dr Linda Spano died on September 10, 2006, of ovarian cancer. Dr Michael Brennan and Dr Linda Spano, together with their families and many friends, have established The Brennan/Spano Family Foundation, which has a major interest in supporting research dedicated to the early detection and treatment of ovarian cancer. For more information, contact The Brennan/Spano Family Foundation within the Victoria Foundation, 109-645 Fort St, Victoria, BC V8W 1G2, or visit www.victoriafoundation.bc.ca

When the fourth member of my 9-person book club was diagnosed with breast cancer, I felt grateful for my own good health and good fortune. We were all baby boomers in our 50s, Western, white, educated, socioeconomically advantaged women. One in 9 Canadian women will confront breast cancer in her lifetime. We had entered the "at risk" population, but these seemed terrible odds. Then it was me.

I was diagnosed with one of the relatives of ovarian cancer—a highly aggressive peritoneal tumour with ascites and widespread abdominal metastases. Stage 3. A woman can get this kind of cancer even if she has had a hysterectomy and oophorectomy.

It has become important for me to find a way to make my experience useful to my successors in this illness. Few family doctors see many patients with ovarian cancer in their practices. In my practice as a family doctor, only 2 women with my diagnosis came to me, both very late in the course of their disease.

Risk factors and genetic testing

I was unaware until I was researching my own blood-line that 3 of the 6 women in my paternal grandmother’s family had died of either breast or ovarian cancer. I had only 1 other risk factor, never having had children.

Few studies of risk factors have focused specifically on ovarian cancer, but we have learned from the overlap of many studies that have targeted breast cancer; age, familial predisposition, and less child-bearing are shared risks with breast cancer. Other risk factors for ovarian cancer include polycystic ovarian syndrome and more frequent menstrual cycling, including early onset of menses and late menopause. Use of oral contraceptives substantially reduces the risk.1

Having 1 first-degree relative or 2 or more clustered second-degree relatives with breast or ovarian cancer, especially before menopause, increase a woman’s risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Descendants of Ashkenazic Jews are at greater risk of having the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which are associated with a lifetime occurrence of breast or ovarian cancer of up to 40%. Approximately 2% of the general population carry BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene. In general, known familial factors account for only about 10% of ovarian cancers.2

Screening and prevention

Genetic testing is not something we do for ourselves. We do it to determine choices for our offspring and our sisters and their daughters. Testing is for them.

Regular examinations and Papanicolaou smears do not help detect ovarian cancer in its early stages. Serendipitous testing, usually to investigate another problem, sometimes uncovers an unexpected early cancer. For those with risk factors, primarily family history or having the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, studies are under way to determine whether biomarkers, such as the cancer antigen 125 test (CA125) and pelvic ultrasound, can alert physicians to the need for further investigations in time.3

For women at high risk, most physicians recommend annual assessment of CA125 levels, bimanual pelvic examination, and transvaginal ultrasound for screening, until better measures are developed.4

The need for better screening methods is clear. The critical question is, Will such screening affect outcomes? Even when family history is compelling, the drastic step of surgical removal of breasts, ovaries, and uterus is a very difficult step to take based only on probability. The US Preventive Services Task Force recommends considering prophylaxis with drugs shown to reduce breast cancer incidence, such as tamoxifen and raloxifene.2

Symptoms

My own symptoms hit quickly. There was new pain—pain when my bladder filled, especially at night. There was discomfort with intercourse and with pressure on my left lower abdomen.

Ovarian cancer usually metastasizes into the abdomen before it causes symptoms. While most public education urges early attention to warning symptoms, only about 10% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at a curable stage.5 By the time symptoms begin—urinary urgency, abdominal bloating, bowel irritability, fatigue, painful intercourse—the cancer is virtually always widespread. Weight loss, breathlessness, anemia, early satiety, and abdominal pain are symptoms that come later.6

Diagnosis

Most of the women I have come to know experienced the frustration of not having their symptoms recognized as serious. As a result, several weeks or months passed before appropriate investigations were undertaken.

One study indicates that most women have symptoms for at least 6 months before diagnosis.4 Doctors often initiate investigation with gastrointestinal or bowel studies in light of the symptoms, but these studies are generally not helpful. Despite its vague presentation, it is the persistence or escalation of symptoms in ovarian cancer that is serious.6

Investigation of suspicious symptoms should include a pelvic examination, assessment of CA125 levels, and transvaginal ultrasound. On pelvic examination, an adnexal mass is usually evident, but the ovary is not always enlarged. Computed tomography scanning is often necessary. Pelvic fluid should not be dismissed as "normal," particularly in postmenopausal women.4

The CA125 test is the best single tool we have to identify and follow a tumour. Levels, however, are not numerically correlated to extent of disease, except within a given individual. Although more than 80% of women with ovarian tumours have elevated CA125 levels when diagnosed, levels are often not elevated until the cancer has spread. False-positive and false-negative results (early in the disease) can occur.7

Treatment

It is not uncommon to think that, faced with this illness, a person might decide not to accept treatment; however, this rarely happens. Meeting women who have been through surgery and chemotherapy, who are finding meaningful life not only during the glorious remission, but also during the treatment process itself, will kindle the weakest hope and strengthen the remotest resolve. Most of the interventions do not add to the quantity of time we live, but rather to the quality.

During the past 10 to 15 years, most women with ovarian cancer have had initial surgery to reduce tumour bulk, ideally to microscopic size. Almost 80% of women are candidates for surgery either before or after initial chemotherapy. They might require an ostomy from bowel or bladder structures to achieve the best possible results.8 Surgery is followed by chemotherapy, which usually entails 6 to 8 cycles of platinum and taxane drugs, each lasting 3 to 4 weeks. Women with "platinum-sensitive" tumours generally go into a remission lasting at least 6 months.9,10

Recently, intraperitoneal chemotherapy as a treatment option has been reexamined. A major US study found that a combination of intravenous and intraperitoneal chemotherapy after primary surgery increased time to recurrence by a median of 12 months and survival by 16 months.11 Although this study demonstrates the first major improvement in survival in many years, it is associated with more severe side effects in the short-term and can be performed only with optimal surgical results and in patients free of other illness.

Many women I know have sought the advice of therapists in the "wellness" or naturopathic movement to try to maximize nutritional and immunologic strengths.

Other commonly accessed resources include therapeutic touch, relaxation, massage, neurolinguistics, healing workshops, and spiritual guidance. There is little study data available to evaluate these therapies with regard to objective benefits in cancer care, but they are regarded as very helpful by women struggling to cope with the disease.

Prognosis

Living under the spectre of a short life expectancy is shocking, confusing, depressing, unnerving, and—sometimes—has a terrible beauty. Every moment becomes precious. I have had my remission. Now I have my own "appointment in Samarra."12

More than 80% of those diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer are already in advanced metastatic stages. Fewer than 10% of these women will live 5 years. They will be "long-term survivors" and will typically have had several rounds of chemotherapy with shorter and shorter remissions. More than half of those who respond to platinum chemotherapy relapse by 12 to 18 months. Median survival ranges from 28 to 40 months. While there are other less lethal types of ovarian cancer, they constitute less than 20% of cases.5

Relapsed ovarian cancer is currently incurable. While ovarian cancer in Canada affects only one tenth of the number of women affected by breast cancer, it will claim more life years. The profile of survival has barely changed in more than 30 years.

Reactions to diagnosis

At some point in our cancer stories, most of us ask "Why me?" I am saddened to hear a great deal of misinformation when I listen to answers to that question.

Having cancer is often the subject of shame, blame, or remorse. In addition to their grief, anger, and angst, women often feel a sense of failure. There is very little evidence that women who develop ovarian cancer are different from other women except for their genetic predispositions and reproductive histories.

There is no evidence that "bad feelings" cause cancer or that "good feelings" cure cancer. Feelings are just feelings. Professionals need to help patients to identify and express their feelings before rushing to explain, suppress, or deny them. Hope should never be discouraged. People do unexpectedly defy the odds.13

Support

The stress of living with cancer is enormous. The expectation that we can all emerge hopeful, positive, and courageous is an additional burden. Added to this, many of the afflicted women I know have no partners and no children.

When asked what is most helpful in coping with the distress of this disease, almost all women with ovarian cancer name family, professional caregivers, and other women who have walked the same path before them. Understandable information is another key element in coping with cancer. The wealth of information on ovarian cancer available on the Internet can be overwhelming at times.

Clinical trials

Many of us, knowing that our lives will be limited, would be willing to risk the potential consequences of being involved in clinical studies. We offer a good testing model because outcomes become evident within a fairly short interval, and our lives are already compromised.

We are long overdue for a national cancer strategy* to help inform the public and coordinate services so that patients know what resources are available and can participate in studies that are trying to answer key questions.

Vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, angiostatins (inhibitors of neovascularization) and stem-cell transplants are among the promising treatments of the future.5,14,15 Most cancers, including ovarian cancer, occur partly because growth factors are "turned on" without normal control mechanisms. Much current research is focusing on ways to block this overactive process.16

Studies are looking at drugs that target human epithelial receptor factors because approximately 30% of women with ovarian cancer have positive test results for this factor.14,17,18 Other epithelial growth factor receptors are also common in women with ovarian cancer. Some tumours trigger a native immune response, and studies are looking at how to enhance this defence.16,19

At the cutting edge of future technologies is nanotechnology, where tiny particles with attachments pass through leaky blood vessels into the tumour and deliver drugs lethal only to the tumour or deliver metallic particles that can then be exposed to infrared light to attack the cancer.20

Resources

Information about clinical trials

Information for patients and families

Footnotes

* Editor’s note: The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer was announced in November 2006 by the Government of Canada. See www.partnershipagainstcancer.ca for more details. Back

The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

References

  1. Abenhaim HA, Titus-Ernstoff L, Cramer DW. Ovarian cancer risk in relation to medical visits, pelvic examinations and type of health care provider. CMAJ 2007;176(7):941-7. DOI:10.1503/cmaj.060697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. US Preventive Services Task Force. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2005;143(5):355-61. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med 2005;143(7):547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. National Institutes of Health, Prospective study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and longitudinal CA-125 screening among women at increased genetic risk of ovarian cancer. Protocol 02-C-0268. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 2007. Available from: http://clinicalstudies.info.nih.gov/cgi/detail.cgi?A_2002-C-0268.html. Accessed 2007 Apr 2.
  4. Smith LH, Morris CR, Yasmeen S, Parikh-Patel A, Cress RD, Romano PS. Ovarian cancer: can we make the diagnosis earlier? Cancer 2005;104(7):1398-407.[Medline]
  5. Berkenblit A, Cannistra SA. Advances in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Reprod Med 2005;50(6):426-38.[Medline]
  6. Goff BA, Mandel LS, Melancon CH, Muntz HG. Frequency of symptoms of ovarian cancerin women presenting toprimary care clinics. JAMA 2004;291(22):2705-12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Buys SS, Partridge E, Greene MH, Prorok PC, Reding D, Riley TL, et al. Ovarian cancer screening in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: findings from the initial screen of a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193(5):1630-9.[Medline]
  8. Morice P, Dubernard G, Rey A, Atallah D, Pautier P, Pomel C, et al. Results of interval debulking surgery compared with primary debulking surgery in advanced stage ovarian cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197(6):955-63.[Medline]
  9. Bookman MA, Greer BE, Ozols RF. Optimal therapy of advanced ovarian cancer: carboplatin and paclitaxel vs. cisplatin and paclitaxel (GOG 158) and an update on GOG0 182-ICON5. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003;13(6):735-40.[Medline]
  10. Moss C, Kaye SB. Ovarian cancer: progress and continuing controversies in management. Eur J Cancer 2002;38(13):1701-7.[Medline]
  11. Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen, Lele S, et al. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;354(1):34-43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Maugham WS. Sheppey. London, Engl: William Heinemann; 1933.
  13. Hirshberg C, Barasch I. Remarkable recovery. New York, NY: Riverhead Books; 1995.
  14. Paley PJ. Angiogenesis in ovarian cancer: molecular pathology and therapeutic strategies. Curr Oncol Rep 2002;4(2):165-74.[Medline]
  15. Hortobagyi GN. Trastuzumab in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353(16):1734-6.[Free Full Text]
  16. See HT, Kavanagh JJ, Hu W, Bast RC. Targeted therapy for ovarian cancer: current status and future prospects. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003;13(6):701-34.[Medline]
  17. Hasan J, Ton N, Mullamitha S, Clamp A, McNeilly A, Marshall E, et al. Phase II trial of tamoxifen and goserlin in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2005;93(6):647-51.[Medline]
  18. Angus DB, Gordon MS, Taylor C, Natale RB, Karlan B, Mendelson DS, et al. Phase 1 clinical study of pertuzumab, a novel HER dimerization inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(11):2534-43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Blank SV, Chang R, Muggia F. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncology 2005;19(4):553-9.[Medline]
  20. Halder J, Kamat AA, Landen CN Jr, Han LY, Lutgendorf SK, Lin Yg, et al. Focal adhesion kinase targeting using in vivo short interfering RNA delivery in neutral liposomes for ovarian carcinoma therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12(16):4916-24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spano, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spano, L. J.


HOME HELP CONTACT US FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SEARCH