|
|
Vol. 53, No. 8, August 2007, pp.1330 - 1331 Copyright © 2007 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada
Characteristics and practice patterns of international medical graduatesHow different are they from those of Canadian-trained physicians?Amardeep Thind, MD PhD, Tom Freeman, MD MClSc, Irene Cohen, MD, Cathy Thorpe, MA, Andrea Burt, MA and Moira Stewart, PhDDr Thind is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry at the University of Western Ontario in London. Dr Freeman and Dr Stewart are Professors in the Department of Family Medicine at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry. Dr Cohen is an Adjunct Professor and IMG Coordinator in the Department of Family Medicine at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry. Ms Thorpe and Ms Burt are Research Associates in the Department of Family Medicine at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Correspondence to: Dr Amardeep Thind, Centre for Studies in Family Medicine, University of Western Ontario, 245-100 Collip Circle, London, ON N6G 4X8; telephone 519 858-5028; fax 519 858-5029; e-mail athind2{at}uwo.ca One of the main problems facing the Canadian health care system today is that patients have difficulty accessing primary care.1 This is in part due to a shortage of primary care physicians.2,3 A recently released report from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) indicated that Canada had fewer practising physicians per capita than most OECD countries (2.1 physicians per 1000 population compared with an OECD average of 3 per 1000).4 Canadas generous immigration policy has opened the way for a large number of foreign-trained physicians to enter the country as immigrants. One policy option being pursued at federal and provincial levels is to increase postgraduate training opportunities for these physicians to facilitate their entry into Canadas physician work force. We could find no Canadian literature comparing the practice patterns of international medical graduates (IMGs) with those of Canadian-trained medical graduates (CMGs), so we analyzed the results of a census of family physicians in southwestern Ontario to compare the individual and practice characteristics of IMGs and CMGs in the region. An analysis by the Canadian Institute for Health Information ascribed the shortage of family physicians in Canada to many factors, among them the 10% reduction in medical school enrolments enforced in 1993, the requirement for an additional year of training enacted the same year, limits on the number of foreign-trained physicians allowed to practise in Canada, and the retirement of many practising physicians.3 This analysis indicated that, although general practitioners now constitute 51% of all physicians, the shortage will become worse in the future due to 2 key demographic shifts: increasing retirements among "baby boomer" physicians and their replacement by an increasing number of female family physicians who are less likely to work full-time, as they have to balance work and family commitments.3,5–7 Data from the Canadian Medical Associations 2004 Masterfile indicate that 23% of all practising physicians in Canada are IMGs.2 Saskatchewan and Newfoundland have a higher proportion of IMG physicians (55% and 44%, respectively) than other provinces, such as Quebec (12%), have.2 The data suggest that IMGs tend to be older on average than CMGs and that there is a lower proportion of female physicians among IMGs.8 Data from the second iteration of the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) 2002 match indicate that 72% of IMGs received their degrees from medical schools in Asia, the Middle East, or Eastern Europe, and nearly one-third had graduated since 1994.9 More than half had completed their training in English, and 42% had practised medicine for 1 to 5 years before coming to Canada.9 The top 5 residency choices reported by IMGs in the 2002 CaRMS match were family medicine and general practice (45%), internal medicine (15%), surgery (7%), obstetrics and gynecology (7%), and pediatrics (5%).9 Nearly half said that their preferred practice location would be in a community of fewer than 100 000 people.9 Few data on actual practice patterns of IMGs, however, are available compared with the data on practice patterns of CMGs. An analysis of 127 275 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals in Ontario between 1992 and 2000 showed that the 30-day and 1-year risk-adjusted mortality rates of IMG- and CMG-treated patients were not statistically different; both groups of physicians also had similar rates of prescribing secondary prevention medications at 90 days and of performing cardiac invasive procedures at 1 year.10 To better understand the practice patterns of IMGs and CMGs, we analyzed data from a decennial census of family physicians in southwestern Ontario. This article reports our findings on the individual and practice characteristics of IMGs and CMGs in this region.
Study design and data sources We did a cross-sectional analysis of data gathered on family physicians in southwestern Ontario. The data, collected as part of a census of all family physicians in the 10 counties surrounding and including London, Ont, provided information on a range of physician, practice, and system characteristics. A mailing list of all physicians in southwestern Ontario was purchased from Scotts Directory and was verified and updated using the family physician mailing list of the Thames Valley Family Practice Research Unit. This is the fourth decade in which information has been collected by investigators at the Centre for Studies in Family Medicine regarding the activities of family physicians.11 For comparison purposes, identical questions to those used in earlier surveys were included in the 2004 survey whenever possible. Some questions had to be altered to reflect changes in clinical practice and organization. The entire questionnaire was pilot-tested by members of our liaison committee (composed of community family physicians and academic researchers) for relevance, clarity, and ease of completion. The study was approved by the University of Western Ontarios Research Ethics Board for the Review of Health Sciences Research Involving Human Subjects. In fall 2004, the survey was mailed to 1044 family physicians in southwestern Ontario using a modified Dillman method.12 The initial package sent by registered mail included the survey, an information letter, a $25 gift certificate, and a self-addressed stamped envelope. Reminder postcards were sent to all physicians 2 weeks later. Two additional packages were mailed to nonrespondents, the first about 4 weeks after the initial mailing and the last about 4 weeks after that. The response rate was 70% (731/1044).
Variables
Individual-level variables included age, sex, completion of a family medicine residency, involvement in undergraduate or postgraduate teaching, and years in practice. Practice-level variables included number of years in practice at current location and type of practice: solo or group, family health team, family health network, family health group, community health centre, or health services organization, as well as usual number of patients seen per week (
Data analysis
In our sample, 67% of the IMGs had received their undergraduate medical degrees from Ireland, the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland, Greece, or South Africa; 16% from developing countries (India, Iraq, China, Pakistan, the Philippines, or Egypt); 5% from eastern Europe (Poland, Bulgaria, or Romania); and the rest from the United States or Taiwan. While year of graduation ranged from 1955 to 2001, nearly 75% had graduated before 1983, and 95% had graduated before 1993. Table 1 shows the individual and practice characteristics of the 105 IMGs and 580 CMGs for whom we had complete data on all variables. In the individual physician characteristics, statistically significant differences were noted in age, years in practice, involvement in teaching, and completion of a family medicine residency. The IMGs were older, had been in practice longer, and were less likely to have completed a family medicine residency or to be involved in undergraduate or postgraduate teaching than the CMGs were.
In the practice characteristics, statistically significant differences were noted in years practising at current location, type of practice (solo or group), provision of maternity and newborn care, acceptance of new patients, and type of population served. Compared with CMGs, IMGs had been in practice longer at their current locations and were more likely to be in solo practice and accepting new patients, but were less likely to be providing maternity and newborn care. They were also more likely to be serving small towns and rural and isolated communities.
Our results indicated that the proportion of IMG physicians in southwestern Ontario (15.3%) was lower than the proportion of IMG physicians among all physicians in Canada (23%) or in Ontario (25%).2 This could be because IMG family physicians in Ontario are less likely to practise in southwestern Ontario (eg, they might choose to practise in the greater Toronto area with its higher population of immigrants) or because a greater proportion of IMGs are specialists.
Individual characteristics
Practice characteristics While IMGs and CMGs do similar numbers of deliveries and provide similar amounts of prenatal care, IMGs are less likely to provide maternity and newborn care in their practices. More research is needed to confirm this finding and to ascertain its cause. It could be because of their patient populations or it might be a reflection of their training or self-perceived competence or lack of competence. The IMG family physicians were more likely to be accepting new patients in their practices and were more likely to be practising in small towns or rural and isolated communities. This is an important positive contribution made by IMG physicians in providing access to primary care, especially for rural and isolated communities in the province.
Limitations
Conclusion
Dr Stewart acknowledges funding through the Dr Brian W. Gilbert Canada Research Chair in Primary Health Care. The study was funded by a grant awarded by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to the Thames Valley Family Practice Research Unit located in the Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, at the University of Western Ontario in London. The views expressed in this paper are the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.
This article has been peer reviewed. Dr Thind, Dr Freeman, Dr Cohen, and Dr Stewart contributed to concept and design of the study; data gathering, analysis, and interpretation; and preparing the article for submission. Ms Thorpe and Ms Burt contributed to data gathering and analysis. None declared
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||