|
|
Vol. 53, No. 9, September 2007, pp.1488 - 1492 Copyright © 2007 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada
Mayhem on the iceDo players injuries put team staff at risk of injury?Ryan P. ArbeauMedical student at Dalhousie University in Halifax, NS
Kevin E. Gordon, MD MS FRCPC
Glen McCurdie
Correspondence to: Dr Kevin E. Gordon, Department of Pediatrics, IWK Health Centre, 5580/5980 University Ave, Halifax, NS B3K 6R8; telephone 902 470-8475; fax 902 470-8486; e-mail kegor{at}dal.ca There is a known risk of injury among those actively participating in team sports that take place on ice.1 There is virtually no information on risk of injury among non-playing participants, such as coaches, managers, and other support personnel. These people are sometimes required to cross ice surfaces to access player benches or to attend to injured players. We were aware of 2 cases of team staff incurring serious injuries as a result of falls while crossing the ice, and we were concerned that these might not be isolated events. We searched the Hockey Canada Accident Database to assess the likelihood of team staff or support personnel incurring serious injuries while crossing the ice and to discover the nature of their injuries.
During warm-up time, a ringette team manager was crossing the ice to access the players bench. The arena had been recently constructed (2003), and only 1 of the players benches was accessible from outside the ice surface. The other was accessible only by crossing the ice. A player who was skating backward saw the manager at the last second and fell while trying to stop, causing the manager to fall backward and strike her head on the ice. The manager was unconscious for a few minutes and was transferred by ambulance to a regional hospital. She had a serious occipital laceration and was diagnosed with a concussion. She reported ongoing symptoms for 6 weeks.
A company hockey teams coach lost his footing while walking across the ice surface. His head struck the ice and he incurred a cerebral hemorrhage. Despite neurosurgical intervention, he died from complications 10 days later.2,3 Partially as a result of his injury, a "no crossing the ice" policy was instituted in rinks in the Ottawa, Ont, area,4 and player benches, penalty boxes, and the timekeepers box were made accessible from outside the ice surface. All team staff contracted to avoid walking on the ice surface to gain access to players benches, penalty boxes, and timekeepers stations.5 Team staff now remain at their benches when shaking hands with players before and after games.4 Rink personnel and paramedics or team staff attending to injured players are required to wear helmets when crossing the ice.5
Hockey Canada maintains an administrative accident database for insurance purposes and for managing risk.6 Reporting is recommended "for each case where an injury is sustained by a player, spectator or any other person at a sanctioned hockey activity."7 Injury reports are filed by team personnel within 90 days of the injury and collected by provincial and regional hockey associations. Official injury reports are entered into the accident database. The nature of, and circumstances surrounding, each injury are described.7 (Report forms can be found at http://members.hockeycanada.ca/downloads/insurance/English%20Injury%20Reports/Hockey%20Canada.pdf.) An anonymous subset of data from the Hockey Canada Accident Database was made available to us by Hockey Canada. The subset was limited to injuries incurred between 2001 and 2005 by team staff or support personnel with the mechanism "fall on ice." We examined injuries incurred by "team officials" (not players, game officials, or spectators) during games (exhibition or regular season, playoff or tournament) to select occasions where team staff or support personnel were likely to be wearing street shoes on the playing surface. The data were manipulated and analyzed in Systat,8 primarily as simple tables. Some of the frequency analyses are presented with data missing.
Hockey Canadas database contained reports of 988 injuries resulting from falls on the ice incurred by team staff or support personnel from the middle of 2001 to the middle of 2005. The most frequent injuries, sprains or strains (n = 301), accounted for 36% of all reported injuries. A remarkable number of fractures were reported (n = 226). Other serious injuries included 5 injuries to internal organs and 94 concussions (11% of all injuries). Table 1 shows a summary of the number and relative frequency of all injuries. Most reported injuries (at least 92%) happened during game time (periods 1 to 3 and overtime). Where information was available on the position of the team official (n = 645), we found trainers were most frequently injured (45%), followed by managers (26%), coaches (20%), hockey administrators (7%), and emergency medical staff (2%). Most of those injured (63%) were sent to hospital for assessment and management (Table 2).
There is a known risk of injury for those who participate in sports on ice. We found that non-playing team staff or support personnel are also at risk of being injured as a result of falls on the ice surface. As most of the reported injuries occurred during game time and were incurred by team staff or support personnel responsible for the welfare of players (managers, trainers or therapists, and emergency medical staff), it seems likely that these injuries occurred while attending to injured players. Injuries do occur outside playing time, however, as the injuries in both of our cases occurred as team staff were preparing for the start of the game. Research on slips and falls is sparse, and there is no literature on non-playing team staff or support personnel incurring injury as a result of slips and falls on ice. Falls usually occur at 1 of 2 points, either on push off (toe off, rear slip) or touch down (heel strike); the latter is more common.9 Head injuries are common in falls due to the biomechanics of falling backward. A proposed systems model of slip-and-fall accidents on ice surfaces has 6 factors9: footwear (sole) properties; underfoot-surface characteristics; sole-surface interface (coefficient of friction); human gait biomechanics (eg, muscle strength, postural control, balance); physiologic and psychological aspects (eg, behaviour, proprioceptive functions, information processing); and the environment (eg, lighting). Injuries resulting from falls on ice can be prevented by preventing the fall or preventing the subsequent injury. Rinks can be designed or retrofitted to allow access to team benches without having to cross the ice (personal communication from Sarah Turney, City of Ottawa Department of Community and Protective Services, July 2005). Even with changes in access, it is necessary to modify the behaviour of team staff and minor officials. One apparently successful approach has been Ottawas "no crossing the ice" policy.4 An alternative strategy for injury prevention is wearing gait-stabilizing footwear when crossing the playing surface. Improving friction at the ice-footwear interface has been shown to be important for preventing slips on ice.10 A recent, randomized, double-blind controlled trial found that a gait-stabilizing device (the Yaktrax Walker) greatly reduced the number of falls among elderly people.11 The Yaktrax Walker is an inexpensive gait-stabilizing device that fits over the sole of a shoe and uses spiral metal coils to bite into the ice. The coils do minimal damage to the ice surface. Helmets are widely recognized to protect against head injury. Having rigorous standards for helmet design and increasing the wearing of helmets has led to reductions in the number of fatal and serious head injuries in hockey.12 Insisting that all rink staff, team staff, and emergency medical personnel crossing the ice wear helmets is a move toward prevention of serious neurologic trauma. Helmets have not been shown to be effective at preventing concussions, however.13 The large number of strains, sprains, and fractures (53% of all injuries) and concussions (10% of all injuries) we found in the Hockey Canada Accident Database constitute injuries that would not be prevented by use of helmets.
Limitations Williamson and Goodman6 have shown that concussions are under-reported in the Hockey Canada database, and it is likely that other injury types are under-reported also. There might be differential reporting of more severe over less severe injuries, given the status of Hockey Canada as a supplemental insurer. We were unable to check the accuracy of the reported injuries, and we had no information on the severity of the injuries. The quality of the data was not optimal, as a lot of information was missing. It was impossible to produce rates of injury, as we had no information on the number of either team staff or support personnel involved or on how many times they had had to cross the ice surface. In the terminology of a methodologic paper describing sports injury rates,17 our study is best described as a "clinical case series," as we are reporting number and type of injuries but not the population at risk or how much exposure puts them at risk. Also, we have likely underestimated the true number of these injuries in Canada, as we have chosen to examine only injuries in and around hockey games (not ringette, speed skating, figure skating, or broomball) and then only when we were certain that street shoes had been worn on the ice by those injured. Despite these limitations, the Hockey Canada data confirm our concern that our 2 cases were not isolated incidents and that each year more than 250 Canadians who are non-playing participants in ice sports incur serious injuries as a result of falls on the ice.
Conclusion
This article has been peer reviewed. Mr Arbeau participated in conception and design of the study and wrote the initial draft. Dr Gordon participated in conception and design of the study, in acquisition of data, and in analysis of data; helped write the initial draft; and supervised the primary author (R.P.A.). Dr McCurdie participated in acquisition of data. All authors helped to interpret data, critically revised the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript. None declared
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||