CFP
HOME HELP CONTACT US FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Can Fam Physician
Vol. 54, No. 1, January 2008, p.23
Copyright © 2008 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CFPlus Traduction en français
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Rapid Responses: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andres, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andres, D.

Debates

Rebuttal: Should newborns be circumcised?

NO

Deirdre Andres, MD CCFP
Family physician and Associate Clinical Professor of Family Medicine at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon

Correspondence to: Dr Deirdre Andres, 100—514 Queen St, Saskatoon, SK S7K 0M5; telephone 306 244-3019; fax 206 244-4737; e-mail d.andres{at}shaw.ca

Ms Smith, you have a lovely baby here. In order to make it easier for you to keep him clean and to prevent future repetitive and invasive procedures as he gets older; to make him look more like the older males in his family and society; and to prevent the possibility of serious diseases later in life, we recommend ... that we pull out all his teeth!

"You won’t have to worry about teaching him to brush and floss. There will be less chance that he will upset future partners with poor oral hygiene, and he will be less likely to develop heart disease1,2 and oral cancers3 as he gets older.

"And, of course, he won’t need that added expense of dental checkups or the pain and trauma of fillings, extractions, root canals, periodontal surgery, or other work that might need to be done in the future.

"It’s best to do the procedure when he’s young; he won’t remember the pain. It would be much more disruptive and traumatic for him if it needed to be done in the future. Of course, we give him a needle for the pain.

"He might not be able to breastfeed as well for a while, but that won’t hurt him in the long run. There might be other complications, like bleeding or infection, and some sources say that he might not enjoy eating as much when he’s older, but again, there is no proof of that. Occasionally there can be long-term damage and some babies might even die, but that is very rare.

"Don’t worry about the ethical implications of removing healthy tissue or that as a baby he can’t give consent. I’m sure that legal case in Oregon will be resolved in our favour.

"On the whole, I think you’ll be happier if we perform this invasive procedure to remove perfectly healthy tissue, because, after all, he’ll never know what he’s missing, and primary prevention of these problems is so much easier. Heart disease is very common, and we need to do whatever we can to prevent it. If he were to get cancer, we might even have to remove part of his tongue or other oral structures.

"After all, our neighbours to the south have a high rate of edentulous people, and we want to keep up with the Jones!"

(My apologies to dentated seniors everywhere).

Footnotes

Competing interests

None declared

References

  1. Genco R, Offenbacher S, Beck J. Periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease. Epidemiology and possible mechanisms. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133(Suppl):14S-22S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Beck JD, Eke P, Heiss G, Madianos P, Couper D, Lin D, et al. Periodontal disease and coronary artery disease: a reappraisal of the exposure. Circulation 2005;112:19-24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Zheng TZ, Boyle P, Hu HF, Duan J, Jian PJ, Ma DQ, et al. Dentition, oral hygiene and risk of oral cancer: a case-control study in Beijing, People’s Republic of China. Cancer Causes Control 1990;113:235-41.



Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Disappointing Argument
Dr. James G McGorman
CFP Online, 13 Feb 2008 [Full text]
Re: It's a Disappointing Argument
David K. Riske
CFP Online, 6 Apr 2008 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CFPlus Traduction en français
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Rapid Responses: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andres, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andres, D.


HOME HELP CONTACT US FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SEARCH