CFP
HOME HELP CONTACT US FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SEARCH
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Can Fam Physician
Vol. 54, No. 9, September 2008, pp.1258 - 1264
Copyright © 2008 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brill, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brill, H.

Clinical Review

Approach to milk protein allergy in infants

Herbert Brill, MD MBA FRCPC
Assistant Professor in the Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition in the Department of Pediatrics at McMaster Children’s Hospital in Hamilton, Ont.

Correspondence to: Dr Herbert Brill, Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 3Z5; telephone 905 521-2100, extension 75637; fax 905 521-2655; e-mailbrillh{at}mcmaster.ca

Milk protein allergy (MPA) is a recognized problem in infancy and might affect up to 15% of infants.1 Most cases of MPA can be managed successfully in the outpatient setting. This article summarizes the current evidence for diagnosis and management of MPA.

Case description

Baby M. is a full-term, 4-kg infant girl delivered vaginally of a 22-year-old primiparous mother after an uneventful pregnancy. At the 2-week follow-up visit, Baby M. has regained her birth weight. Her mother reports frequent episodes of regurgitation after breastfeeding, which do not distress her. Family history is significant for environmental allergies in both parents and a paternal uncle with eczema and severe asthma. At the 4-week follow-up visit, the mother reports ongoing regurgitation followed occasionally by crying. Stools have become more frequent and appear watery. The baby’s weight is 4150 g, a gain of 10 g/d since the last visit.

Sources of information

A MEDLINE search was conducted using the MeSH heading milk-hypersensitivity. English-language articles studying subjects younger than 1 year of age were selected. Additional articles were derived from review articles found with the initial search strategy, yielding a total of 36 publications. Evidence was levels I, II, and III.

Epidemiology

Cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA) appears to be the most common MPA, with controlled challenge trials demonstrating an incidence of 2% to 5% among formulafed infants (level I evidence).1 The incidence in breastfed infants is 0.4% to 0.5% according to 2 trials (level I evidence), 2,3 but might be as high as 2.1% (level II evidence).4 Determining the incidence of allergy to milk proteins from other sources is complicated by the widespread use of bovine milk. A population-based cohort study found the incidence of soy allergy to be 0.25% (level II evidence).5 Among high-risk infants, CMPA appears to outweigh soy milk protein allergy (SMPA) by a factor of 6 to 1 (level I evidence).6 A study by Klemola et al found the incidence of SMPA to be 10% among children with CMPA.7 Interestingly, qualitative observation alone suggested a cross-reactivity as high as 30%, but only a 10% rate was observed using rigorous quantitative measures. This underscores the importance of appropriately testing diagnostic suspicions. Cross-reactivity between milk protein from ewe, goat, or buffalo and bovine milk protein has been demonstrated in vitro.8 Unfortunately, Canadian data are lacking.

Pathophysiology

Milk protein allergy can manifest via IgE-mediated and non–IgE-mediated pathways.9 An IgE-mediated allergy (also known as type I hypersensitivity reaction) occurs when antigens bind to IgE antibodies bound to mast cells. Cross-linking of 2 IgE antibodies by an antigen causes the mast cell to release histamine, a potent inflammatory mediator, resulting in an immediate allergic reaction. Non–IgE-mediated MPA is likely multifactorial and includes immune complexes of IgA or IgG antibodies bound to milk antigens (type III hypersensitivity reaction) and direct stimulation of T cells by milk protein antigens (type IV hypersensitivity reaction). The interactions result in cytokine release and increased production of antibodies that recognize the offending milk proteins, contributing to an inflammatory cascade. These more complex immune interactions result in delayed onset of clinical symptoms. While there is overlap of clinical symptoms in the 2 groups of immune reactions,9 a non–IgE-mediated allergy is certain with isolated bloodstreaked stools (level III evidence). With the other symptoms, while a distinction might be suspected it cannot be confirmed by clinical history alone (Table 110–12). Making the distinction is important, as IgE-mediated MPA is associated with a higher risk of multiple food allergies and atopic conditions such as asthma later in life (level I and II evidence).10,13


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Symptoms of milk protein allergy and their differential diagnoses

 
Cross-sensitization between protein sources is well established. Among infants with CMPA, 13% to 20% have allergies to beef (level II evidence).14 Restani et al demonstrated that antibodies harvested from children with CMPA recognize milk proteins from ewe, goat, and buffalo species, but not from camels (level II evidence).8 Completely different organisms produce soy and bovine proteins. Rozenfeld et al demonstrated that a monoclonal antibody specific to casein (a bovine milk protein) displayed affinity to a component of glycinin, an ingredient in soy-based formulas.15

Clinical presentation

Infants with MPA usually present with symptoms similar to allergic reactions in older individuals. These include cutaneous symptoms such as urticaria, rash, and pruritus, as well as respiratory symptoms such as wheeze and cough (level I evidence).11 These symptoms are usually indicative of IgE-mediated MPA.9

Milk protein allergy can also present with gastrointestinal and nutritional manifestations. These include gastroesophageal reflux, esophagitis, gastritis, delayed gastric emptying, enteropathy, colitis, constipation, and failure to thrive (level I to II evidence).12 These symptoms might be the cause of behaviour such as crying inconsolably and refusing feeding. The symptoms are the same among breastfed and formula-fed infants. Gastrointestinal symptoms are particularly challenging owing to their nonspecificity and wide differential diagnosis, but MPA should always be suspected. One study administered a cow's milk—free diet to 10 infants with refractory gastroesophageal reflux that had not improved with pharmacologic therapy and reported that 2 of the infants' symptoms improved (level II evidence).16 Jakobsson et al administered hydrolyzed formula to 15 infants with severe colic and demonstrated a 60% to 70% reduction in daily crying time (level II evidence),17 but caution should be used in generalizing these results to all infants with colic.


Levels of evidence
Level I: At least one properly conducted randomized controlled trial, systematic review, or meta-analysis

Level II: Other comparison trials, non-randomized, cohort, case-control, or epidemiologic studies, and preferably more than one study

Level III: Expert opinion or consensus statements

 

Diagnosis

Confirming the diagnosis of MPA is important owing to the discrepancy between parental description of symptoms and scientific confirmation. 7,9 Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge has long been regarded as the criterion standard (level I evidence),18 however, owing to the risk of substantial allergy during food challenge, an alternative test with equal efficacy is preferred. Other investigational options include skinprick testing (SPT), serum measurement of IgE antibodies to the specific allergen, and patch testing. A recent study suggests that a combination SPT and measuring IgE antibodies results in a positive predictive value of 95% for diagnosing IgE-mediated CMPA, obviating the need for the food challenge if an IgE-mediated CMPA is suspected (level I evidence).19 A similar study, however, failed to reproduce these results (level II evidence).20 Skin-prick testing and specific IgE levels are not useful for the diagnosis of non–IgE-mediated MPA,9 but patch testing shows promise.21

Laboratory investigations are not diagnostic but can support a diagnosis made on clinical grounds. A decreased albumin level is suggestive of enteropathy (level III evidence). Increased platelets, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and fecal leukocytes are all evidence of inflammation but are nonspecific; normal values do not rule out MPA (level III evidence). Eosinophilic leukocytosis might be present in both types of MPA.20

Management

The main principle in management of MPA is to avoid allergens while maintaining a balanced, nutritious diet for infants and mothers. Although it is difficult, breastfeeding can be continued if allergens are avoided. For CMPA, a breastfeeding mother must sequentially eliminate all cow’s milk protein, then all bovine protein (milk and meat), and occasionally other protein sources such as soy (level II evidence).22,23 A similar broad restriction is recommended for other MPAs given their low incidence and association with CMPA (level III evidence). Consultation with a dietitian is essential for a mother who continues breastfeeding; particular attention must be paid to adequate calcium intake. A list of foods containing cow’s milk and soy proteins is found in Table 2.24,25


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2 Sources of cow’s milk protein and soy protein

 
For formula-fed infants, current options include specific allergen avoidance, extensively hydrolyzed protein formulas (EHFs), and amino acid–based formulas (AAFs) (Table 3). Extensively hydrolyzed protein formulas incorporate hydrolysates of casein or whey derived from cow’s milk. Their efficacy among those with CMPA is approximately 90% (level I to II evidence),23,26–29 though their efficacy among those with other forms of MPA is less well demonstrated. These formulas do have potentially allergenic material,30 and allergic reactions have been reported.31,32 A rice-based EHF shows promise in young children,33 but is not commercially available. Amino acid–based formulas are created from constituent amino acids and have demonstrated efficacy of approximately 99% (level I evidence)28,34; they can be considered as an immediate or secondary alternative to EHFs. However, even AAFs contain potentially allergenic material, such as soy lecithin, so their use must be monitored. The taste of the formula might be an issue for compliance; as a rule of thumb, the more hydrolyzed a formula, the worse the taste.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 3 Hydrolyzed formulas available in Canada

 
Specific allergen avoidance, such as substituting soy-based formulas for milk-based in CMPA, is not recommended. The concomitant presence of multiple MPAs reduces the likelihood of success of milk protein substitution.7,8 Additionally, cross-sensitization of milk proteins correlates with increased intestinal permeability (level II evidence).35 Thus, allergy-induced enteropathy might increase the risk of cross-sensitization if specific allergen avoidance is pursued during the acute phase (level III evidence). If the expense of EHFs or AAFs is a concern, in order to avoid the risk of cross-sensitization, have patients avoid alternate protein sources for at least 1 month to give the intestinal mucosa time to heal, then challenge with a protein alternative (level III evidence).

Introduction of solid food can occur at the usual age barring complications such as feeding aversion. Education regarding diet restriction is essential and is best achieved with the help of a dietitian (level III evidence). 36 The importance of a dietitian referral is underscored by a study demonstrating a high rate of parental error in avoiding milk protein–laced foods at the grocery store (level II evidence).37 Parents might also worry about lactose intolerance, and they should be reassured of the extreme rarity of lactase deficiency in infants younger than 1 year of age.38

Prognosis

The timing of reintroducing milk protein is of great concern to parents. Traditionally, it was thought that MPA resolved by 1 to 2 years of age (level III evidence).9,39 Two recent studies, however, suggest a more complex answer. Carroccio et al40 found the proportions of Italian infants with CMPA who had milk tolerance at 1, 2, and 3 years after initiation of milk-free diets were 30%, 54%, and 70%, respectively. Vanto et al41 demonstrated a difference in tolerance when considering the type of CMPA among Finnish infants (level II evidence). At 2, 3, and 4 years of age, children with non–IgE-mediated CMPA had milk tolerance at rates of 64%, 92%, and 96%, respectively, while children with IgE-mediated allergy were milk tolerant at rates of 31%, 53%, and 63% (level II evidence). Furthermore, children with less reactive SPT results and fewer specific IgE antibodies were milk tolerant sooner than children with more dramatic findings. Taken together, these results suggest that cow’s milk protein can be reintroduced in trial fashion at 1 year of age in children deemed to have non–IgE-mediated allergy, while children suspected of IgE-mediated allergy should not be exposed to cow’s milk for longer time periods, with the length of time guided by allergy testing. Data regarding resolution of other types of MPA are lacking, though children with multiple food allergies are more likely to remain allergic.

When to refer

There are no published guidelines on when to refer infants with MPA to specialist care. A list of potential situations in which it is prudent to refer infants for specialized care can be found in Table 410 (level III evidence).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 4 When and to whom to refer infants with milk protein allergy

 
Summary of a practical approach

A diagnostic and treatment algorithm is provided in Figure 1.


Figure 10541258
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1 Algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of milk protein allergy (MPA)

*If anaphylactic allergy is suspected, do not reintroduce allergen. Consult an allergist.

 
  • Weight should be followed closely (Table 542).
  • The timing of clinical response to protein elimination depends on the symptoms observed and the manner of infant feeding.
    - In formula-fed infants, esophagitis and behavioural symptoms should respond within 72 hours.
    - Other non–IgE-mediated symptoms should start to improve within 7 days.
    - Colitis can take up to 3 weeks to heal; ongoing bloody stools can persist even when patients are improving generally.
    - Advise breastfeeding mothers that a 7-day washout of milk proteins is required when instituting a restricted diet, delaying the expected clinical response.

  • Milk protein allergy can be successfully managed in primary care with the support of a dietitian; consultation with other specialists should be reserved for severe allergies, failure to respond to standard management, and specific allergy testing if indicated.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 5 Appropriate weight gain in infancy

 
Case resolution

Baby M.’s bloodwork results revealed the following: platelet count 474 x 109/mL; albumin 34 g/L; and no eosinophilic leukocytosis. Stool microscopy results revealed many fecal leukocytes per high-powered field. The mother was advised to remove all bovine milk products from her diet. She returned for a followup visit 2 weeks later and reported normalization of stools and resolution of crying with regurgitation. She was advised to resume consumption of cow’s milk products. She called the office 3 days later and reported a recurrence of the looser, more frequent stools. Upon removing cow’s milk from the diet, the stool pattern improved. A diagnosis of CMPA was made. A dietitian saw mother and infant when Baby M. was 5 months of age and provided advice regarding introduction of solid foods. Cow’s milk was reintroduced at 11.5 months of age without a relapse of symptoms, and Baby M. ate cake at her first birthday party.


EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

  • Milk protein allergy can occur in both formula-fed and breastfed infants, usually in the first year of life. The presentation can be cutaneous (eg, rashes, pruritus), but can also include respiratory, gastrointestinal, and nutritional manifestations. Some might present with behaviours such as crying inconsolably and refusing feeding.
  • Milk protein allergy is suspected based on history. Investigational options include food challenge, skinprick testing, serum measurement of specific IgE antibodies, and patch testing.
  • The main principle in management is to avoid allergens while maintaining a balanced, nutritious diet for infants and mothers; breastfeeding can be continued if allergens are avoided by the mother. Infants’ weight should be followed closely.
  • Milk protein allergy can be successfully managed in primary care with the support of a dietitian; consultation with other specialists should be reserved for severe allergies, failure to respond to standard management, and specific allergy testing if indicated.

 


POINTS DE REPÈRE DU RÉDACTEUR

  • L’allergie aux protéines du lait peur survenir durant l’allaitement au biberon ou durant l’allaitement maternel, habituellement avant l’âge d’un an. Les manifestations initiales peuvent être cutanées (p.ex. rash, prurit), mais elles peuvent aussi être d’ordre respiratoire, digestif ou nutritionnel. Certains nourrissons présentent d’abord des pleurs irréductibles et refusent toute nourriture.
  • L’historique permet de soupçonner une allergie aux protéines du lait. Les investigations possibles incluent la provocation alimentaire, le prick-test, la mesure du taux sérique des anticorps IgE spécifiques et l’épidermoréaction.
  • Le traitement cherchera principalement à éviter l’allergène tout en maintenant un régime nourrissant et équilibré, pour le nourrisson comme pour la mère; l’allaitement au sein peut être poursuivi si la mère évite les allergènes. Le poids du bébé doit être étroitement surveillé.
  • L’allergie aux protéines du lait peut être traitée avec succès en soins primaires avec le soutien d’une diététicienne; les autres spécialistes ne devraient être consultés qu’en cas d’allergie sévère ou d’échec du traitement standard et quand des tests d’allergie spécifiques sont indiqués.

 

Acknowledgments

I thank Dr Deanna Telner for her assistance with this manuscript.

Footnotes

This article has been peer reviewed.

Cet article a fait l’objet d’une révision par des pairs.

Competing interests

None declared

References

  1. Høst A. Frequency of cow’s milk allergy in childhood. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2002;89(6 Suppl 1):33–7.[Medline]
  2. Jakobsson O, Lindberg T. A prospective study of cow’s milk protein intolerance in Swedish infants. Acta Paediatr Scand 1979;68(6):853–9.[Medline]
  3. Høst A, Husby S, Osterballe O. A prospective study of cow’s milk allergy in exclusively breast-fed infants. Incidence, pathogenetic role of early inadvertent exposure to cow’s milk formula, and characterization of bovine milk protein in human milk. Acta Paediatr Scand 1988;77(5):663–70.[Medline]
  4. Saarinen KM, Juntunen-Backman K, Järvenpää AL, Klemetti P, Kuitunen P, Lope L, et al. Breast-feeding and the development of cows’ milk protein allergy. Adv Exp Med Biol 2000;478:121–30.[Medline]
  5. Arshad SH, Tariq SM, Matthews S, Hakim E. Sensitization to common allergens and its association with allergic disorders at age 4 years: a whole population birth cohort study. Pediatrics 2001;108(2):e33.[Medline]
  6. Cantani A, Lucenti P. Natural history of soy allergy and/or intolerance in children, and clinical use of soy-protein formulas. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1997;8(2):59–74.[Medline]
  7. Klemola T, Vanto T, Juntunen-Backman K, Kalimo K, Korpela R, Varjonen E. Allergy to soy formula and to extensively hydrolyzed whey formula in infants with cow’s milk allergy: a prospective, randomized study with a follow-up to the age of 2 years. J Pediatr 2002;140(2):219–24.[Medline]
  8. Restani P, Gaiaschi A, Plebani A, Beretta B, Cavagni G, Fiocchi A, et al. Crossreactivity between milk proteins from different animal species. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29(7):997–1004.[Medline]
  9. Baehler P, Chad Z, Gurbindo C, Bonin AP, Bouthillier L, Seidman EG. Distinct patterns of cow’s milk allergy in infancy defined by prolonged, two-stage doubleblind, placebo-controlled food challenges. Clin Exp Allergy 1996;26(3):254–61.[Medline]
  10. Høst A. Cow’s milk protein allergy and intolerance in infancy. Some clinical, epidemiological and immunological aspects. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1994;5(5 Suppl):1–36.[Medline]
  11. Heine RG, Elsayed S, Hosking CS, Hill DJ. Cow’s milk allergy in infancy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;2(3):217–25.[Medline]
  12. Salvatore S, Vandenplas Y. Gastroesophageal reflux and cow milk allergy: is there a link? Pediatrics 2002;110(5):972–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Høst A, Halken S. A prospective study of cow milk allergy in Danish infants during the first 3 years of life. Clinical course in relation to clinical and immunological type of hypersensitivity reaction. Allergy 1990;45(8):587–96.[Medline]
  14. Martelli A, De Chiara A, Corvo M, Restani P, Fiocchi A. Beef allergy in children with cow’s milk allergy; cow’s milk allergy in children with beef allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2002;89(6 Suppl 1):38–43.[Medline]
  15. Rozenfeld P, Docena GH, Añón MC, Fossati CA. Detection and identification of a soy protein component that cross-reacts with caseins from cow’s milk. Clin Exp Immunol 2002;130(1):49–58.[Medline]
  16. McLain BI, Cameron DJ, Barnes GL. Is cow’s milk protein intolerance a cause of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infancy? J Paeditr Child Health 1994;30(4):316–8.[Medline]
  17. Jakobsson I, Lothe L, Borschel MW. Effectiveness of casein hydrolysate feedings in infants with colic. Acta Paediatr 2000;89(1):18–21.[Medline]
  18. Bock SA, Sampson HA, Atkins FM, Zeiger RS, Lehrer S, Sachs M, et al. Doubleblind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) as an office procedure: a manual. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82(6):986–97.[Medline]
  19. García-Ara C, Boyano-Martínez T, Díaz-Pena JM, Martín-Muñoz F, Reche-Frutos M, Martín-Esteban M. Specific IgE levels in the diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity to cows’ milk protein in the infant. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;107(1):185–90.[Medline]
  20. Anveden-Hertzberg L, Finkel Y, Sandstedt B, Karpe B. Proctocolitis in exclusively breast-fed infants. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155(6):464–7.[Medline]
  21. Canani RB, Ruotolo S, Auricchio L, Caldore M, Porcaro F, Manguso F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the atopy patch test in children with food allergy-related gastrointestinal symptoms. Allergy 2007;62(7):738–43.[Medline]
  22. Järvinen KM, Mäkinen-Kiljunen S, Suomalainen H. Cow’s milk challenge through human milk evokes immune responses in infants with cow’s milk allergy. J Pediatr 1999;135(4):506–12.[Medline]
  23. Terheggen-Lagro SW, Khouw IM, Schaafsma A, Wauters EA. Safety of a new extensively hydrolysed formula in children with cow’s milk protein allergy: a double blind crossover study. BMC Pediatr 2002;2:10.[Medline]
  24. McMaster Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinic. Milk and dairy free diet [handout]. Hamilton, ON: McMaster Pediatric Gastroenterology Clinic; 2007.
  25. Government of Canada. Soy. One of the nine most common food allergens. Ottawa, ON: Government of Canada; 2005. Available from: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/securit/allergen_soy-soja_e.pdf. Accessed 2008 Jul 11.
  26. Sampson HA, Bernhisel-Broadbent J, Yang E, Scanlon SM. Safety of casein hydrolysate formula in children with cow milk allergy. J Pediatr 1991;118(4 Pt 1):520–5.[Medline]
  27. Giampietro PG, Kjellman NI, Oldaeus G, Wouters-Wesseling W, Businco L. Hypoallergenicity of an extensively hydrolyzed whey formula. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2001;12(2):83–6.[Medline]
  28. Isolauri E, Sütas Y, Mäkinen-Kiljunen S, Oja SS, Isosomppi R, Turjanmaa K. Efficacy and safety of hydrolyzed cow milk and amino acid-derived formulas in infants with cow milk allergy. J Pediatr 1995;127(4):550–7.[Medline]
  29. Halken S, Høst A, Hansen LG, Osterballe O. Safety of a new, ultrafiltrated whey hydrolysate formula in children with cow milk allergy: a clinical investigation. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1993;4(2):53–9.[Medline]
  30. Rosendal A, Barkholt V. Detection of potentially allergenic material in 12 hydrolyzed milk formulas. J Dairy Sci 2000;83(10):2200–10.[Abstract]
  31. Cantani A, Micera M. Immunogenicity of hydrolysate formulas in children (part 1). Analysis of 202 reactions. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2000;10(5):261–76.[Medline]
  32. Cantani A, Micera M. Immunogenicity of hydrolysate formulas in children (part 2): 41 case reports. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2001;11(1):21–6.[Medline]
  33. Fiocchi A, Travaini M, D’Auria E, Banderali G, Bernardo L, Riva E. Tolerance to a rice hydrolysate formula in children allergic to cow’s milk and soy. Clin Exp Allergy 2003;33(11):1576–80.[Medline]
  34. Niggemann B, Binder C, Dupont C, Hadji S, Arvola T, Isolauri E. Prospective, controlled, multi-center study on the effect of an amino-acid-based formula in infants with cow’s milk allergy/intolerance and atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2001;12(2):78–82.[Medline]
  35. De Boissieu D, Dupont C, Badoual J. Allergy to nondairy proteins in mother’s milk as assessed by intestinal permeability tests. Allergy 1994;49(10):882–4.[Medline]
  36. Fiocchi A, Assa’ad A, Bahna S. Adverse Reactions to Foods Committee, American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology Food allergy and the introduction of solid foods to infants: a consensus document. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006;97(1):10–21.[Medline]
  37. Joshi P, Mofidi S, Sicherer SH. Interpretation of commercial food ingredient labels by parents of food-allergic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109(6):1019–21.[Medline]
  38. Canadian Paediatric Society, Dietitians of Canada, Health Canada. Nutrition for healthy term infants—statement of the Joint Working Group: Canadian Paediatric Society, Dietitians of Canada and Health Canada. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 2005 Available from: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/pubs/infant-nourrisson/nut_infant_nourrisson_term-eng.php. Accessed 2008 Apr 21.
  39. Baehler P, Seidman EG. Gastrointestinal manifestations of food-protein-induced hypersensitivity: eosinophilic gastroenteritis. In: Rudolph CD, Rudolph AM, Hostetter MK, Lister G, Siegel NJ, editors. Rudolph’s pediatrics. 21st ed ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003. p. 1444–7.
  40. Carroccio A, Montalto G, Custro N, Notarbartolo A, Cavataio F, D’Amico D, et al. Evidence of very delayed clinical reactions to cow’s milk in cow’s milk-intolerant patients. Allergy 2000;55(6):574–9.[Medline]
  41. Vanto T, Helppilä S, Juntunen-Backman K, Kalimo K, Klemola T, Korpela R, et al. Prediction of the development of tolerance to milk in children with milk hypersensitivity. J Pediatr 2004;144(2):218–22.[Medline]
  42. Overby KJ. Pediatric health supervision: physical growth, Rudolph CD, Rudolph AM, Hostetter MK, Lister G, Siegel NJ, trans. Rudolph’s pediatrics. 21st ed ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Professional; 2003. p. 5.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Résumé
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Rapid Responses: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Rapid Responses are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brill, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brill, H.

HOME HELP CONTACT US FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES SEARCH