Table 3

Associations between organizational or cultural factors for participating FHTs and team climate scores

FACTORUNIVARIATE ANALYSIS β (95% CI)PVALUEMULTIPLE VARIABLE ANALYSIS β (95% CI)PVALUE
Leadership scale score0.63 (0.56 to 0.69)< .0010.48 (0.40 to 0.55)< .001
Organizational culture
  • Group0.13 (0.11 to 0.16)< .0010.04 (0.001 to 0.07).04
  • Developmental0.08 (0.03 to 0.13).0020.05 (−0.005 to 0.10).08
  • Hierarchical−0.20 (−0.23 to −0.16)< .001−0.06 (−0.10 to −0.009).02
  • Rational−0.08 (−0.13 to −0.03).001NANA
No. of EMR capabilities used*0.07 (−0.01 to 0.15).100.03 (0.003 to 0.06).03
Months operational as an FHT−0.012 (−0.02 to −0.004).002−0.003 (−0.0006 to −0.006).04
EMR perceptions−0.05 (−0.10 to 0.003).07NA> .10
No. of staff in FHT0.001 (−0.003 to 0.006).60NANA
Full team meetings at least monthly−0.12 (−0.47 to 0.22).50NANA
No. of patients per physician (< 1000, 1000–1999, ≥2000)0.04 (−0.21 to 0.30).75NANA
Single site versus multiple sites0.09 (−0.23 to 0.41).59NANA
  • CI—confidence interval, EMR—electronic medical record, FHT—family health team, NA—not applicable.

  • * Of a possible 22, including scheduling appointments, billing, within-clinic messaging, clinical notes, prescribing information (drug interactions, warnings, direct-to-pharmacy prescribing), laboratory or radiology requisitions, viewing laboratory and imaging results (history and follow-up notes), patient demographic information, patient problem lists, medications, disease registries, decision-support tools, queries, and reminders for guideline-based interventions.