Table 2.

Comparison of self-efficacy scores within categories using the Friedman test: Self-efficacy was scored on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.

CATEGORYITEMSMEAN (SD) SELF-EFFICACY SCOREFRIEDMAN TEST
Patient’s prepregnancy BMIUnderweight range8.31 (2.12)Embedded Image
P = .572
Normal range8.53 (1.89)
Overweight range8.35 (1.91)
Obese range8.48 (1.94)
Patient’s ageTeenager8.20 (2.14)Embedded Image
P = .001
Young adult8.44 (2.02)
Approaching middle age8.66 (1.60)
Patient’s educationHigh school8.42 (2.09)Embedded Image
P = .067
Postsecondary8.63 (1.69)
Postgraduate or professional degree8.46 (1.82)
Patient’s SESLow SES8.17 (2.28)Embedded Image
P < .001
Middle SES8.46 (1.98)
High SES8.69 (1.82)
Familiarity with the patientFamiliar8.56 (1.87)Embedded Image
P < .001
Somewhat familiar8.18 (2.00)
Not at all familiar7.63 (2.56)
Perceived quality of the clinician-patient relationshipAbove average8.92 (1.39)Embedded Image
P < .001
Average8.33 (1.81)
Below average6.58 (2.57)
Attendance alone or accompaniedAlone8.83 (1.46)Embedded Image
P < .001
Companion with underweight BMI7.66 (2.37)
Companion with normal BMI7.87 (2.21)
Companion with overweight BMI7.75 (2.29)
Companion with obese BMI7.73 (2.34)
Comparison of patient’s prepregnancy BMI to clinician’s own BMIA lot lower8.57 (2.10)Embedded Image
P = .034
Lower8.53 (2.06)
The same8.56 (2.04)
Higher8.32 (2.22)
A lot higher8.24 (2.33)
Degree to which the clinic is running on timeOn time8.72 (1.75)Embedded Image
P < .001
30 min late6.21 (2.64)
60 min late5.14 (3.24)
Time allotted for prenatal visit30 min8.80 (1.50)Embedded Image
P < .001
20 min7.86 (2.10)
15 min6.66 (2.59)
10 min5.70 (3.04)
  • BMI—body mass index, SES—socioeconomic status.