Abstract
The usefulness of three components of the routine admission complete blood cell count (leukocyte count, hematocrit, and platelet count) was evaluated in 301 patients consecutively admitted to the internal medicine wards of a university teaching hospital. Using a consensus analysis approach, three faculty members reviewed the patients’ charts to determine which tests were performed routinely, which tests were abnormal, and which routine tests led to diagnostic or therapeutic changes. Overall, 55.3% of the tests were considered routine admission tests. Abnormalities were detected in 13.6% of the routine leukocyte counts, in 8.2% of the routine hematocrit levels, and in 12.4% of the routine platelet counts. However, treatment was changed for only three patients, all of whom had low hematocrits; this amounted to 0.6% of all tests. Furthermore, only one of the three patients received appropriate treatment that might have been withheld if a routine hematocrit determination had not been ordered. The authors conclude that the impact of routine admission complete blood cell counts on patient management is small and that the practice of ordering this test for all hospitalized patients could be eliminated with little adverse effect on patient care.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kroenke K, Hanley JF, Copley JB, et al. The admission urinalysis: impact on patient care. J Gen Intern Med 1986;1:238–42
Hubbell FA, Greenfield S, Tyler JL, Chetty K, Wyle FA. The impact of routine admission chest x-ray films on patient care. N Engl J Med 1985;312:209–13
Moorman JR, Hlatky MA, Eddy DM, Wagner GS. Duke Medical House Staff. The yield of the routine admission electrocardiogram. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:590–5
Korvin CC, Pearce RH, Stanley J. Admissions screening: clinical benefits. Ann Intern Med 1975;83:197–203
Durbridge TC, Edwards F, Edwards RG, Atkinson M. Evaluation of benefits of screening tests done immediately on admission to hospital. Clin Chem 1976;22:968–71
Shapiro MF, Greenfield S. The complete blood count and leukocyte differential count: an approach to their rational application. Ann Intern Med 1987;106:65–74
Shapiro MF, Hatch RL, Greenfield S. Cost containment and labor-intensive tests: the case of the leukocyte differential count. JAMA 1984;252:231–34
Rich EC, Crowson TW, Connelly DP. Effectiveness of differential leukocyte count in case finding in the ambulatory care setting. JAMA 1983;249:633–6
Connelly DP, McClain MP, Crowson TW, Benson ES. The use of the differential leukocyte count for inpatient casefinding. Hum Pathol 1982;13:294–300
Van de Ven A, Delbecq A. The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies. Am J Public Health 1972;62:337–42
Fink AF, Kosecoff J, Ghassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984;74:979–83
Kaplan EB, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann AJ, et al. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening. JAMA 1985;253:3576–81
Delahunt B, Turnbull PRG. How cost effective are routine preoperative investigations. NZ Med J 1980;92:431–32
Domoto K, Ben R, Wei JY, Pass TM, Komaroff AL. Yield of routine annual laboratory screening in the institutionalized elderly. Am J Public Health 1985;75:243–5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, University of California, Irvine, Medical Center, Orange, California, and the Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Education, MacNeal Hospital, Rush Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frye, E.B., Hubbell, F.A., Akin, B.V. et al. Usefulness of routine admission complete blood cell counts on a general medical service. J Gen Intern Med 2, 373–376 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596360
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596360