Skip to main content
Log in

Home visits in a rural office practice

Clinical spectrum and effect on utilization of health care services

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:To describe the clinical features of home visits and their role in continuity of care, costs, and benefits in a rural office practice.

Design:Prospective study of all home visits performed during a 26-month period.

Setting:A general medicine teaching office practice located in rural Virginia.

Patients:All persons to whom home visits were made during the study period.

Main results:138 home visits were made to 47 patients who had a mean age of 73.2 years. Home visits accounted for 1.4% of patient encounters in the practice, required a mean of 7.1 miles of one-way travel and a mean of 48 minutes, including travel time, to complete, and generated $36 in income per visit. Most patients (27 of 47) were not permanently homebound. Reasons for patients’ being homebound were grouped into six categories (acute illness, frail elderly, terminal illness, advanced chronic disease, neurologic problem, and miscellaneous reasons). The reasons for visits were grouped into four categories (acute self-limited illness, exacerbation of chronic disease, routine follow-up of chronic disease, and psychosocial problem). Physicians judged that 80% of home visits represented appropriate use of their services. In addition, 46% of home visits made an emergency room visit unnecessary, and 9% made a hospital admission unnecessary. At the time of 75% of home visits, physicians reported personal benefits of making the visit.

Conclusions:Home visits have an important role in the care of ambulatory as well as permanently homebound patients. While physicians judged most home visits to be appropriate and personally beneficial, these visits required more time and generated less revenue than did office visits for comparable problems. Because home visits generated as well as prevented the use of medical services, their impact on the overall cost of medical care in this setting is unclear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rowland D. Help at home. Baltimore: Commonwealth Fund Commission on Elderly People Living Alone, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson D, Hendershot G, Fulton J. Aging in the eighties: functional limitations of individuals aged 65 years and over. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics. No. 103. DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 87-1250. Hyattsville, MD: Public Health Service, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stone RI, Murtaugh CM. The elderly population with chronic functional disability: implications for home care eligibility. Gerontologist. 1990;30:491–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Home care in the 1900s. JAMA. 1990;263:1241–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Educating physicians in home health care. JAMA. 1991;265:769–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siwek J. House calls: current status and rationale. Am Fam Physician. 1985;31(4):169–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Health and Public Policy Committee, American College of Physicians. Home health care. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105:454–60.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boling PA, Retchin SM, Ellis J, Pancoast SA. The influence of physician specialty on housecalls. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2333–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson MP, O’Grady RS, Anderson IL. Public health nursing in primary care: impact on home visits. Public Health Nurs. 1985;2(3):145–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schueler MS, Harris DL, Goodenough GK, et al. House calls in Utah. West J Med. 1987;147:92–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koenig HG. The physician and home care of the elderly patient. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 1986;7(1):15–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Philbrick JT, Connelly JE, Corbett EC, et al. Restoring balance to internal medicine training: the case for the teaching office practice. Am J Med Sci. 1990;299(1):43–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1982;240–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kerlinger FN. Foundations of behavioral research. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973;525–35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zimmer JG, Groth-Juncker A, McCusker J. Effects of a physician-led home care team on terminal care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984;32:288–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunham NC, Kindig DA, Lastiri-Quiros S, Barham MT, Ramsay P. Uncompensated and discounted Medicaid care provided by physician group practices in Wisconsin. JAMA. 1991;265:2982–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boling PA, Retchin SM, Ellis J, Pancoast SA. Factors associated with the frequency of house calls by primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1991;6:335–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received from the Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Philbrick, J.T., Connelly, J.E. & Corbett, E.C. Home visits in a rural office practice. J Gen Intern Med 7, 522–527 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599457

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02599457

Key words

Navigation