Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of incident fractures on health-related quality of life: 5 years of data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Using prospective data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos), we compared health utilities index (HUI) scores after 5 years of follow-up among participants (50 years and older) with and without incident clinical fractures. Incident fractures had a negative impact on HUI scores over time.

Introduction

This study examined change in health-related quality of life (HRQL) in those with and without incident clinical fractures as measured by the HUI.

Methods

The study cohort was 4,820 women and 1,783 men (50 years and older) from the CaMos. The HUI was administered at baseline and year 5. Participants were sub-divided into incident fracture groups (hip, rib, spine, forearm, pelvis, other) and were compared with those without these fractures. The effects of both time and fracture type on HUI scores were examined in multivariable regression analyses.

Results

Men and women with hip fractures, compared to those without, had lower HUI measures that ranged from −0.05 to −0.25. Both women and men with spine fractures had significant deficits on the pain attributes (−0.07 to −0.12). In women, self-care (−0.06), mobility and ambulation (−0.05) were also negatively impacted. Women with rib fractures had deficits similar to women with spine fractures, and these effects persisted over time. In men, rib fractures did not significantly affect HUI scores. Pelvic and forearm fractures did not substantially influence HUI scores.

Conclusion

The HUI was a sensitive measure of HRQL change over time. These results will inform economic analyses evaluating osteoporosis therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC et al (2000) Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int 11:556–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D et al (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE et al (2002) Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:1644–1650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sernbo I, Johnell O (1993) Consequences of a hip fracture: a prospective study over 1 year. Osteoporos Int 3:148–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Papaioannou A, Wiktorowicz ME, Adachi JD et al (2000) Mortality, independence in living, and re-fracture, one year following hip fracture in Canadians. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 22:591–597

    Google Scholar 

  6. Papaioannou A, Adachi JD, Parkinson W et al (2001) Lengthy hospitalization associated with vertebral fractures despite control for comorbid conditions. Osteoporos Int 12:870–874

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Melton LJ III, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C et al (1992) Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7:1005–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lips P (1997) Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med 103:3S–8S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson SA, Tenenhouse A, Robertson L (2000) Vertebral fracture definition from population-based data: preliminary results from the Canadian Multicenter Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:680–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Olszynski WP et al (2002) The impact of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures on health related quality of life in postmenopausal women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 3:11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Silverman SL, Cranney A (1997) Quality of life measurement in osteoporosis. J Rheumatol 24:1218–1221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G et al (2006) Determinants of health-related quality of life in women with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:355–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Pickard L et al (2003) The association between osteoporotic fractures and health-related quality of life as measured by the Health Utilities Index in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 14:895–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kreiger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L et al (2002) The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): background, rationale, methods. Can J Aging 18:376–387

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M et al (1995) Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. PharmacoEconomics 7:490–502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D et al (2003) The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW et al (2001) The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med 33:375–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bowker SL, Pohar SL, Johnson JA (2006) A cross-sectional study of health-related quality of life deficits in individuals with comorbid diabetes and cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Barnabi F et al (2008) The feasibility and responsiveness of the health utilities index in patients with early-stage breast cancer: a prospective longitudinal study. Qual Life Res 17:333–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang DT, Sesselberg HW, McNitt S et al (2007) Improved survival associated with prophylactic implantable defibrillators in elderly patients with prior myocardial infarction and depressed ventricular function: a MADIT-II substudy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 18:833–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nichol G, Stiell IG, Hebert P et al (1999) What is the quality of life for survivors of cardiac arrest? A prospective study. Acad Emerg Med 6:95–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gold M, Franks P, Erickson P (1996) Assessing the health of the nation. The predictive validity of a preference-based measure and self-rated health. Med Care 34:163–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Manuel DG, Schultz SE, Kopec JA (2002) Measuring the health burden of chronic disease and injury using health adjusted life expectancy and the Health Utilities Index. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:843–850

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cranney AB, Coyle D, Hopman WM et al (2005) Prospective evaluation of preferences and quality of life in women with hip fractures. J Rheumatol 32:2393–2399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organization (WHO) (1998) Guidelines for preclinical evaluation and clinical trials in osteoporosis. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167:S1–S34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Health Utilities Inc. (2007) HUInc: leaders in the utility assessment of health-related quality of life. Available at http://healthutilities biz

  28. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ et al (1996) Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care 34:702–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Meyer HE et al (2004) Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs. Osteoporos Int 15:567–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hallberg I, Rosenqvist AM, Kartous L et al (2004) Health-related quality of life after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:834–841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sawka AM, Thabane L, Papaioannou A et al (2005) Health-related quality of life measurements in elderly Canadians with osteoporosis compared to other chronic medical conditions: a population-based study from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 16:1836–1840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Prieto L, Sacristan JA (2003) Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gabriel SE, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ III et al (1999) Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use? Med Decis Mak 19:141–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM et al (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

Alexandra Papaioannou, MD, FRCPC, MSc

Consulting and Advisory Role: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck Frosst, Novartis, Proctor and Gamble, sanofi-aventis, Servier

Clinical Trials: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Proctor and Gamble, sanofi-aventis

Jacques P. Brown, MD, FRCPC has received honoraria for lecturing, consultancies, grants and research support for clinical trials: Abbott, Alpharx, Amgen, Arthrolab, sanofi-aventis Canada, Boehringer Ingelheim/Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltech, Eli Lilly Canada, Genizon, Glaxosmithkline, Merck Frosst, Nicox, Novartis, NPS Pharma, Pfizer, Proctor and Gamble, Quintiles, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Servier, Wyeth, Zelos

Robert G. Josse, MB, FRCPC

Advisory boards, honoraria, research grants: Lilly, Proctor and Gamble/sanofi-aventis, Merck, Novartis, Servier, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, Wyeth

Emmanuel Papadimitropoulos, PhD is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company in the Research and Development division.

Stephanie M Kaiser, MD, FRCPC

Advisory Boards: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Wyeth-Ayerst, Servier

Speaker for: Amgen, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Procter and Gamble/sanofi-aventis, AstraZeneca, Servier

David Goltzman, MD, FRCPC

Consulting Role: Lilly, Novartis, sanofi-aventis, Proctor and Gamble, Servier

Wojciech P. Olszynski, MD, FRCPC

Consulting Role: Abbott Laboratories, Limited; Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.; Amgen Canada Inc.; Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.; Aventis Pharma Inc.; Pfizer Canada Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd.; Procter and Gamble Pharmaceutical Canada, Inc.; Eli Lilly Canada Inc.; Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc.; Genzyme Canada Inc.; Schering Canada Inc.; GlaxoSmithKline Inc.; Servier Canada Inc.; Hoffmann-LaRoche Limited; Solvay Pharma Inc.; Janssen-Ortho Inc./Ortho-Biotech; Wyeth Canada

Jonathan D. Adachi, MD, FRCPC

Consulting Role: Amgen; Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly; GlaxoSmithKline; Merck Frosst; Novartis; Proctor and Gamble; Roche; sanofi-aventis; Servier

Clinical Trials: Eli Lilly; GlaxoSmithKline; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Proctor and Gamble; sanofi-aventis; Servier; Wyeth-Ayerst

Courtney C. Kennedy, MSc; George Ioannidis, MSc; Anna M. Sawka MD, FRCPC, PhD; Wilma M. Hopman, MSc; Laura Pickard MSc; Tassos Anastassiades, MD; Alan Tenenhouse, MD; Jerilynn C. Prior MD: No competing interests to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Papaioannou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Papaioannou, A., Kennedy, C.C., Ioannidis, G. et al. The impact of incident fractures on health-related quality of life: 5 years of data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 20, 703–714 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0743-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0743-7

Keywords

Navigation