Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The cost–utility of lumbar disc herniation surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cost and utility of surgery for a herniated lumbar disc has not been determined simultaneously in a single cohort. The aim of this study is to perform a cost–utility analysis of surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation. Ninety-two individuals in a cohort of 1,146 Swedish subjects underwent lumbar disc herniation surgery during a 2-year study. Each person operated on was individually matched with one treated conservatively. The effects and costs of the treatments were determined individually. By estimating quality of life before and after the treatment, the number of quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained with and without surgery was calculated. The medical costs were much higher for surgical treatment; however, the total costs, including disability costs, were lower among those treated surgically. Surgery meant fewer recurrences and less permanent disability benefits. The gain in QALY was ten times higher among those operated. Lower total costs and better utility resulted in a better cost utility for surgical treatment. Surgery for lumbar disc herniation was cost-effective. The total costs for surgery were lower due to lower recurrence rates and fewer disability benefits, and surgery improved quality of life much more than nonsurgical treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersson GB, Deyo RA (1996) History and physical examination in patients with herniated lumbar discs. Spine 21:10S–18S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Chang Y, et al (2001) Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 26:1179–1187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Björk S, Norinder A (1999) The weighting exercise for the Swedish version of the EuroQol. Health Econ 8:117–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloch F, Prins R (eds) (2000) Who returns to work and why? A six country study on work incapacity and reintergration. Transaction Publisher, New Brunswick

  5. Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burström K (2003) Population health and inequalities in health—measurement of health-related quality of life and changes in QALY over time in Sweden. In: Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Thesis

  7. Drummond M, O’Brien B, Stoddart G et al (1997) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ekman M, Zethraeus N, Dahlström U et al (2002) Kostnadseffektivt att behandla kronisk hjärtsvikt med bisoprolol. Läkartidning 99:646–650

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G (1999) The Cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine 24:1820–1832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansson TH, Hansson EK (2000) The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries. Spine 25:3055–3064

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hansson EK, Hansson TH (2005) The costs for persons sick-listed more than one month because of low back or neck problems. A two-year prospective study of Swedish patients. Eur Spine J 14:337–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Henriksson F (2001) Economic aspects of chronic diseases: multiple sclerosis and diabetes mellitus. In: Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy and Elderly Care Research, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Thesis

  13. Jansson KA (2005) On lumbar spinal stenosis and disc herniation surgery. In: Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Orthopedics. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Thesis

  14. Jansson KA, Nemeth G, Granath F et al (2004) Surgery for herniation of a lumbar disc in Sweden between 1987 and 1999. An analysis of 27,576 operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:841–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohlmann T, Raspe HH (1994) [Grading of backache]. Ther Umsch 51:375–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Korff von M, Ormel J, Keefe F et al (1992) Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50:133–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Malter AD, Larson EB, Urban N et al (1996) Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy for the treatment of herniated intervertebral disc (discussion 1055). Spine 21:1048–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rivero-Arias O, Campbell H, Gray A et al (2005) Surgical stabilisation of the spine compared with a programme of intensive rehabilitation for the management of patients with chronic low back pain: cost utility analysis based on a randomised controlled trial. Bmj 330:1239

    Google Scholar 

  19. Torrance GW (1997) Preferences for health outcomes and cost-utility analysis. Am J Manag Care 3(Suppl):S8–S20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tulder van MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM (1995) A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands. Pain 62:233–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waddell G (1991) Low back disability. A syndrome of Western civilization. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2:719–738

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weber H (1983) Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine 8:131–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber H (1994) The natural history of disc herniation and the influence of intervention (discussion 2233). Spine 19:2234–2238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are greatly indebted to Associate Professor Robert Jonsson for statistical advice. This study was supported by grants from the Medical Faculty, Göteborg University and the Swedish Council for Social Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth Hansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, E., Hansson, T. The cost–utility of lumbar disc herniation surgery. Eur Spine J 16, 329–337 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0131-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0131-y

Keywords

Navigation