Abstract
A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal disorders. The study purpose was to evaluate the effect of wait time to surgery on patient derived generic and disease specific functional outcome following surgery. A prolonged wait to surgery may adversely affect surgical outcome. Although there is literature on the effect of wait time to surgery in surgical fields such as oncology, cardiac, opthamologic, and total joint arthroplasty, little is known regarding the effect of wait time to surgery as it pertains to the spinal surgical population. Consecutive patients undergoing elective posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative disorders were recruited. Short-Form 36 and Oswestry disability questionnaires were administered (pre-operatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-operatively). Patients completed a questionnaire regarding their experience with the wait time to surgery. The study cohort consisted of 70 patients with follow-up in 53/70 (76%). Time intervals from the onset of patient symptoms to initial consultation by family physician through investigations, spinal surgical consultation and surgery were quantified. Time intervals were compared to patient specific improvements in reported outcome following surgery using Cox Regression analysis. The effect of patient and surgical parameters on wait time was evaluated using the median time as a reference for those patients who had either a longer or shorter wait. Significant improvements in patient derived outcome were observed comparing post-operative to pre-operative baseline scores. The greatest improvements were observed in aspects relating to physical function and pain. A longer wait to surgery was associated with less improvement in outcome following surgery (SF-36 domains of BP, GH, RP, VT). A longer wait time to surgery negatively influences the results of posterior lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions as quantified by patient derived functional outcome measures. The parameters of pain severity and physical aspects of function appear to be the most significantly affected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buchanan R, Birch JG, Morton AA et al (2003) Do you see what I see? Looking at scoliosis surgical outcomes through orthopedists’ eyes. Spine 28(24):2700–2704 (discussion 2705)
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J et al (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47(11):1245–1251
Ciampolini J, Hubble MJ (2005) Early failure of total hip replacements implanted at distant hospitals to reduce waiting lists. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87(1):31–35
Coast J (1993) The role of economic evaluation in setting priorities for elective surgery. Health Policy 24(3):243–257
Conner-Spady BL, Sanmugasunderam S, Courtright P et al (2005) The prioritization of patients on waiting lists for cataract surgery: validation of the Western Canada waiting list project cataract priority criteria tool. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 12(2):81–90
Derrett S, Paul C, Morris JM (1999) Waiting for elective surgery: effects on health-related quality of life. Int J Qual Health Care 11(1):47–57
Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ et al (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 23(18):2003–2013
Garbuz DS, Xu M, Duncan CP et al (2006) Delays worsen quality of life outcome of primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:79–84
Gibson JN, Grant IC, Waddell G (2000) Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001350
Gibson JN, Waddell G, Grant IC (2000) Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001352
Kelly KD, Voaklander D, Kramer G et al (2000) The impact of health status on waiting time for major joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15(7):877–883
Lieberman JR, Dorey F, Shekelle P et al (1996) Differences between patients’ and physicians’ evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(6):835–838
Lofvendahl S, Eckerlund I, Hansagi H et al (2005) Waiting for orthopaedic surgery: factors associated with waiting times and patients’ opinion. Int J Qual Health Care 17(2):133–140
Mahon JL, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH et al (2002) Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study. Cmaj 167(10):1115–1121
Nunez M, Nunez E, Segur JM et al (2006) The effect of an educational program to improve health-related quality of life in patients with osteoarthritis on waiting list for total knee replacement: a randomized study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14(3):279–285
Ostendorf M, Buskens E, van Stel H et al (2004) Waiting for total hip arthroplasty: avoidable loss in quality time and preventable deterioration. J Arthroplasty 19(3):302–309
Suarez-Almazor ME, Conner-Spady B, Kendall CJ et al (2001) Lack of congruence in the ratings of patients’ health status by patients and their physicians. Med Decis Making 21(2):113–121
Weller I, Wai EK, Jaglal S et al (2005) The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(3):361–366
Wiese M, Kramer J, Bernsmann K et al (2004) The related outcome and complication rate in primary lumbar microscopic disc surgery depending on the surgeon’s experience: comparative studies. Spine J 4(5):550–556
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr. Marjan Vidmar for his assistance with the study statistical analysis. The authors also acknowledge Ms. Lynn Antwi-Boasiako, Ms. Nana Adjei, Dr. Fathi Elkasah, Dr. Moamer Elnagret, Dr. Abdulhamid Elyousfi, and Ms. Olivia Murnaghan for their contribution to this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A reviewer’s comment on this paper is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0453-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braybrooke, J., Ahn, H., Gallant, A. et al. The impact of surgical wait time on patient-based outcomes in posterior lumbar spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 16, 1832–1839 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0452-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0452-5