Abstract
The following presents the outcome of an evaluation of family violence prevention programs for male offenders. The moderate and high intensity programs were designed and implemented to conform to the Risk-Needs-Responsivity (RNR) principles. Results showed that program participation significantly reduced attitudes that supported violence against women and improved pro-social skills related to non-abusive relationships; treatment effects were moderate to high. Parole officer feedback generally reported positive changes in behavior and attitude associated with treatment. A post-release follow-up indicated that program completion significantly reduced spousal violence and general violent recidivism. Program participation did not, however, have a significant impact on non-violent crime. Results indicate that domestic violence programs respecting the RNR principles may be effective in reducing partner violence.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Preliminary analyses indicated that there were no differences in recidivism rates between those who had received no treatment and those who had dropped out of treatment. Therefore, we chose to combine these offenders into the group labelled “Untreated Offenders” in order to increase the sample size for subsequent analyses. The reasons for dropping out of treatment varied: of the 51 who dropped out of either the moderate or high program, about 30 % did so because they were transferred to another institution, had a conflict with scheduling, or had problems understanding the language of instruction, variables that are not theoretically linked to risk to reoffend).
References
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, Ohio: Anderson Publishing Co.
Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment outcome research. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023–1053.
Babcock, J. C., Canady, B., Graham, K. H., & Schart, L. (2007). The evolution of battering interventions: From the dark ages into the scientific Age. In J. Hamel & T. Nicholls (Eds.), Family interventions in domestic violence: A handbook of gender-inclusive theory and treatment (pp. 215–244). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Bennett, L. W., Stoops, C., Call, C., & Flett, H. (2007). Program completion and re-arrest in a batterer intervention system. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(1), 42–54.
Blackburn, R., & Fawcett, D. J. (1999). The Antisocial Personality Questionnaire (APQ): An inventory for assessing personality deviation in offenders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 15, 14–22.
Bowen, E. (2011). The rehabilitation of partner-violent men. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Bowen, E., Gilchrist, E. A., & Beech, A. R. (2008). Change in treatment has no relationship with subsequent re-offending in U.K. domestic violence sample: A preliminary study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52(5), 598–614.
Brennan, S. (2009). Violent victimization of Aboriginal women in the Canadian provinces. Juristat. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 85-002-X. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2011001/article/11439-eng.htm
Brown, S. L., & Motiuk, L. L. (2005). The Dynamic Factors Identification and Analysis (DFIA) component of the Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process: A meta-analytic, psychometric and consultative review. Research report R-164. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.
Buttell, F. P., & Carney, M. M. (2006). A large sample evaluation of a court-mandated batterer intervention program: Investigating differential program effect for African American and Caucasian men. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(2), 121–131.
Carney, M. M., & Buttell, F. (2006). Exploring the relevance of interpersonal dependency as a treatment issue in batterer intervention. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(3), 276–286.
Cavanaugh, M. M., & Gelles, R. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies: New directions for research, policy, and practice. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 155–166.
Compton, W. M., Conway, K. P., Stinson, F. S., Colliver, J. D., & Grant, B. F. (2005). Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity of DSM-IV antisocial personality syndromes and specific drug use disorders in the united states: Results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 66, 677–685.
Connors, A. D., Mills, J. F., & Gray, A. L. (2012). An evaluation of intimate partner violence intervention with incarcerated offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 1176–1196. doi:10.1177/0886260511424499.
Correctional Service Canada (2001). Assessment manual for the moderate and high intensity family violence prevention programs. Ottawa, ON: Reintegration Programs Division. Revised 2006.
Daly, J. E., Power, T. G., & Gondolf, E. W. (2001). Predictors of batterer program attendance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(10), 971–991.
Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A synthesis of the literature. Women and Criminal Justice, 10(2), 69–94.
Davis, R., Taylor, B., & Maxwell, C. (1998). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn (Rep. No. 94-IJ-CX-0047). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS.
Day, A., Chung, D., O’Leary, P., & Carson, E. (2009). Programs for men who perpetrate domestic violence: An examination of the issues underlying the effectiveness of intervention programs. Journal of Family Violence, 24(3), 203–212.
Dunford, F. (2000). The San Diego Navy Experiment: An assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 468–476.
Dutton, D. G. (1995). The domestic assault of women. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Dutton, D. G., & Corco, K. (2006). Transforming a flawed policy: A call to revive psychology and science in domestic violence research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 457–483.
Dutton, D. G., & Haring, M. (1995). Perpetrator personality effects on post-separation victim reactions in abusive relationships. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Dutton, D. G., & Hart, S. D. (1992). Risk markers for family violence in a federally incarcerated population. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 15, 101–112.
Feder, L., & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 343–375.
Feder, L., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers’ behavior? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(2), 239–262.
Feder, L., Wilson, D. B., & Austin, S. (2008). Court-mandated interventions for individuals convicted of domestic violence: Campbell Systematic Reviews 2008:12, The Campbell Corporation.
Ferguson, L. M. (2004). Assessing the Correctional Service of Canada High Intensity Family Violence Prevention Program. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Department of Psychology Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan. http://ecommons.usask.ca/handle/10388/etd-05272004-060720. Accessed 20 Jan 2014.
Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117–130). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Gondolf, E. W. (1999). A comparison of reassault rates in four batterer programs: Do court referral, program length and services matter? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(1), 41–61.
Gondolf, E. W., & Jones, A. (2001). The program effect of batterer programs in three cities. Violence and Victims, 16(6), 693–704.
Gordon, J. A., & Moriarty, L. J. (2003). The effects of domestic violence batterer treatment on domestic violence recidivism: The Chesterfield County experience. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30(1), 118–134.
Hanson, K., & Wallace-Capretta, S. (2000). Predicting recidivism among male batterers. Research report 2000–06. Ottawa, ON: Department of the Solicitor General Canada.
Harris, G. T., Hilton, N. Z., & Rice, M. E. (2011). Explaining the frequency of intimate partner violence by male perpetrators: Do attitude, relationship, and neighborhood variables add to antisociality? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 309–331.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Meehan, J. C. (2004). Typologies of men who are maritally violent: Scientific and clinical implications. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(12), 369–389.
Hupka, R. B., & Rusch, P. A. (2001). Interpersonal relationship scale. In B. F. Perlmutter, J. Touliatos, & G. W. Holden (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques: Instruments & index (Vol. 3, pp. 148–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Jewell, I. M., & Wormith, S. J. (2010). Variables associated with attrition from domestic violence treatment programs targeting male batterers: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(10), 1086–1113.
Jones, A., D’Agostino, R., Gondolf, E., & Heckert, A. (2004). Assessing the effect of batterer program completion on reassault using propensity scores. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(9), 1002–1020.
Kroner, D. G., & Weekes, J. R. (1996). Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: Factor structure, reliability, and validity with an offender sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 323–333.
Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2000). The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 101–118.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1999). Manual for the spousal assault risk assessment guide (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Services.
Lanyon, R. I., & Carle, A. C. (2007). Internal and external validity scores on the balanced inventory of desirable responding and the paulhus deception scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 859–876.
Levesque, D., Gelles, R., & Velicer, W. (2000). Development and validation of a stages of change measure for men in batterer treatment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 24(2), 175–199.
Maxwell, C. D., Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (2010). The impact of length of domestic violence treatment on the patterns of subsequent intimate partner violence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6, 475–497.
Morrison, S., & Nesius, A. (2003). Findings from an evidence-based review of batterer prevention and intervention programs. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Family Violence, San Diego, CA.
Motiuk, L. L. (1997). Classification for correctional programming: The Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process. Forum on Corrections Research, 9(1), 18–22.
Motiuk, L. L., & Porporino, F. J. (1991). The prevalence, nature and severity of mental health problems among federal male inmates in Canadian penitentiaries. Report-24, Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
Nafekh, M., & Motiuk, L. L. (2002). The Statistical Information on Recidivism - Revised 1 (SIR- R1) Scale: A Psychometric. Report R-126, Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
Nuffield, J. (1982). Parole decision making in Canada: Research towards decisions guidelines. Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General Canada.
Oldham, J., Clarkin, J., Applebaum, A., Carr, A., Kernberg, P., Lottermen, A., & Haas, G. (1985). A self-report instrument for Borderline Personality Organization. In T. H. McGlashan (Ed.), The Borderline: Current empirical research. The progress in psychiatry series (pp. 3–18). Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Press, Inc.
Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(1), 6–21.
Palmer, S. E., Brown, R. A., & Barrera, M. E. (1992). Group treatment program for abusive husbands: Long-term evaluation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62(2), 276–283.
Paulhus, D. L. (1990). Measurement and control response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measurement of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 37–41). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shipley, W. C. (1967). Shipley Institute of Living Scale. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services. Revised by Zachary, R. A. (1991).
Statistics Canada (2011). Family violence in Canada: A statistical profile. Catalogue no. 85–224-X.
Stewart, L. A., Gabora, N., Kropp, P. R., & Lee, Z. (2005). Family violence programming: Treatment outcome for Canadian federally sentenced offenders. Research Report R-174. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
Stewart, L. A., Power, J., & Cousineau, C. (2011). Profile and programming needs of federal offenders with histories of intimate partner violence. Research Report R-265. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
Stover, C. S., Meadows, A., & Kaufman, J. (2009). Interventions for intimate partner violence: Review and directions for evidence based practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(3), 223–233.
Stuart, R. B. (2005). Treatment for partner abuse: Time for a paradigm shift. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36(3), 254–263.
Taylor, B. G., Davis, R. C., & Maxwell, C. D. (2001). The effects of a group batterer treatment program: A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Justice Quarterly, 18(1), 171–201.
Usher, A., & Stewart, L. A. (2011). Validation of the Generic Program Performance Measure (GPPM). Research Report R-255. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
Wexler, A. (2000). Can typologies of male batterers be generalised to populations of federal inmates? Unpublished Masters Thesis. Ottawa: Carleton University. http://catalogue.library.carleton.ca/search~S9?/aWexler+a/awexler+a/1%2C4%2C4%2CB/frameset&FF=awexler+audrey+f+audrey+francoise+1972&1%2C1%2C. Accessed 20 Jan 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This report is in partial fulfillment of contract 21120-02-7743-INH-00 between the BC Institute Against Family Violence (BCIFV) and the Correctional Service of Canada. Funding for the project was provided by the Department of Justice, Canada and Health Canada. The following individuals made valuable contributions to this project: Jessica Ius and Melanie Bania assisted with the parole officer interviews; Katherine Rossiter and Dayna Medveduke were responsible for coding recidivism data; Stephen Hart, Ph.D., provided consultation on statistical analyses.
The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent the views of the Correctional Service of Canada or the Canadian government.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, L.A., Gabora, N., Kropp, P.R. et al. Effectiveness of Risk-Needs-Responsivity-Based Family Violence Programs with Male Offenders. J Fam Viol 29, 151–164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9575-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-013-9575-0