Clinical study
Reliability of blood glucose monitoring by patients with diabetes mellitus

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(84)90693-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Nineteen patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were evaluated for overall reliability of self-generated data from capillary blood glucose monitoring. For a period of 12 to 14 days, standard reflectance meters used by these subjects were replaced by meters internally modified with memory chips capable of storing all glucose readings by date and time. The subjects were not aware of this modification and were instructed to continue to test capillary blood glucose as they had been and to continue their practice of recording the meter readings in a logbook. To assess reliability of patientgenerated data as recorded in the logbook, the addition, deletion, and alteration of test results were determined. A significantly lower (p < 0.0001) mean blood glucose level was reported in the logbooks than recorded in the memory reflectance meters. Differences in logbooks and memory reflectance meters ranged from 0 to 109 mg/dl. Three fourths of the subjects had reported lower than actual mean blood glucose values. Under-reporting, or omission of memory reflectance meter readings, averaged 10 percent, whereas overreporting or addition of phantom values averaged 40 percent. An average of 26 percent of the logbook entries were not identical to memory reflectance meter values determined at the corresponding time. Two thirds of the subjects had reported values in such a manner as to obscure hyper- and hypoglycemia, leading to misleading clinical impressions about the fluctuation in metabolic control. Previous glycemic control, patterns of logbook recording, or visits to the clinic were not found to be predictive of the reliability of patient self-monitoring regimens.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (238)

  • Advances in glucose monitoring: Improving diabetes management through evidence-based medicine

    2020, Primary Care Diabetes
    Citation Excerpt :

    When continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was introduced it was greeted in the same manner as self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) 30 years earlier. In the 1970’s and 1980’s papers questioned SMBG accuracy and reliability, the same occurred in the period following the introduction of CGM [1–4]. This review examines the fate of glucose monitoring over the past 40 years with an emphasis on the latest developments.

  • Introduction

    2020, Adherence and Self-Management in Pediatric Populations
  • Can Smart Pens Help Improve Diabetes Management?

    2022, Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
View all citing articles on Scopus

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant 2P-60-AM-20541-06 and a research and development contract from the Ames Division of Miles Laboratories.

1

From the Diabetes Research and Training Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, Bronx, New York.

2

From the Ames Division, Miles Laboratories, Elkhart, Indiana.

View full text