The accuracy of self-reported Pap smear utilisation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00222-5Get rights and content

Abstract

This study assessed the accuracy of self-reported Pap smear utilisation over four different time frames, examining the magnitude of errors in self-report and sociodemographic predictors of accuracy. Self-report data on women's cervical screening was collected by interview in a random household survey (Hunter Region, NSW, Australia), with pathology laboratory data collected by a search of records within laboratories. The magnitude of error in self-report was assessed by comparing it against longer intervals in pathology laboratory data. Sociodemographic predictors of accuracy were explored using chi square analyses. Low values for specificity and positive predictive value across all four time frames indicate a considerable degree of inaccuracy in women's reporting of those instances where, in truth, screening has not occurred. Of women reporting a smear within the last three years, only 61.2% were verified within pathology laboratory records. Allowing women some “leeway” in their reporting, comparing self-report to longer intervals of pathology laboratory data, did not greatly improve the accuracy of reporting, confirming that the magnitude of inaccuracy involved is of real clinical significance. Demographic variables were not related to the accuracy of self-report and, while a woman's certainty of her response was predictive, this had little impact on the measures of agreement. Self-report of Pap smear histories consistently results in over-reporting of screening. Other means of assessing the prevalence of screening may be preferable to self-report. Where self-report data is collected, techniques to improve accuracy should be employed, and care should be taken in comparing screening rates obtained by different methods.

References (23)

  • W.G. Cochran

    Sampling Techniques

    (1977)
  • Cited by (87)

    • Cervical cancer screening among women ≥70years of age in the United States-A referral problem or patient choice

      2015, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, information on Pap smear use, access to care, and receiving recommendations for Pap smears was self-reported and subject to recall bias. Pap smear use may be overestimated as we did not have medical records to confirm patient reports (Bowman et al., 1997; Caplan et al., 2003; Gordon et al., 1993; Johnson et al., 1995; Montaño and Phillips, 1995; Suarez et al., 1995; Vernon et al., 2004). Moreover, women may have misinterpreted receiving a pelvic examination as undergoing a Pap smear.

    • Cervical cancer screening in Middle Eastern and Asian migrants to Australia: A record linkage study

      2012, Cancer Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many, however, have inferred ethnicity from women's family names [22–24] or their residence in areas known to have high populations of immigrants, which may entail substantial misclassification of country of birth [3,25]. In addition, most have been based on self-reports of cervical screening, which are well known to be subject to recall and social desirability biases [26,27]. Moreover, a number of the studies included samples of only a few hundred women, which precluded detailed analysis.

    • Inequalities in cervical cancer screening for women with or without a regular consulting in primary care for gynaecological health, in Paris, France

      2012, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, upon examining the substantial strengths of the estimated associations, we think that our results are meaningful and that they cannot be completely explained by such biases. Furthermore, many previous studies concluded that, if the self-reporting of CCST could lead to an overestimation of this practice, this overestimation was not different according to women' SES (Bowman et al., 1997; Mamoon et al., 2001). These results – as well as the fact that 55.5% of the women with RCGH who indicated that they had never had a CCST reported that nobody had ever proposed such a test to them – could be taken to mean that French primary care providers do not follow cancer screening recommendations as closely with these women and that the primary health-care system is thereby contributing to social inequalities in women's cancer prevention.

    • Inadequate cervical cancer screening among mid-aged Australian women who have experienced partner violence

      2009, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      This was evident in the time between the first questionnaire in 1996 and the fourth questionnaire in 2004 and likely to be a reason for non-response at the initial mailout in 1996. Furthermore, the self-report measures used in this study might also limit the findings (Bowman et al., 1997; Canfell et al., 2006). However, the study also has strengths.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text