Review and special article
The effectiveness of mailed patient reminders on mammography screening: A meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(97)00003-2Get rights and content

Abstract

background: Researchers have tried to increase mammography screening rates by using patient-oriented reminders. This paper compares the effectiveness of mailed patient reminders at increasing mammography screening.

Methods: Sixteen published articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. To assess the association between reminders and mammography screening, the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (OR) was calculated.

Results: Among U.S. studies in which controls did not receive any type of reminder, women who received reminders were approximately 50% more likely to get a mammogram (OR 1.48; χ2MH(1) = 38.27, P < .001). In addition, tailored letters were found to be more effective than generic reminders (OR 1.87; χ2MH(1) = 4.70, P < .05). Combining cost and effectiveness data allowed for estimates of cost per woman screened, which ranged from $0.96 to $5.88.

Conclusions: Patient reminders are effective at increasing mammography screening. More research is needed to assess (1) the cost-effectiveness of patient reminders and (2) their effectiveness across race, education, income, and type of insurance.

References (42)

  • S. Shapiro

    Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial

    Cancer

    (1977)
  • S Shapiro et al.

    Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1982)
  • L Tabar et al.

    What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations?

    An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial

    Br J Cancer

    (1987)
  • D Palli et al.

    A case-control study of the efficacy of a non-randomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy)

    Int J Cancer

    (1986)
  • PH Peeters et al.

    The predictive value of positive test results in screening for breast cancer by mammography in the Nijmegen programme

    Br J Cancer

    (1987)
  • H Seidman et al.

    Survival experience in the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (1987)
  • K Kerlikowske et al.

    Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography

    Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation

    JAMA

    (1996)
  • L Tabar et al.

    Breast-cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40–49 years

    Int J Cancer

    (1996)
  • W Rakowski et al.

    Integrating behavior and intention regarding mammography by respondents in the 1990 National Health Interview Survey of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention

    Public Health Rep

    (1993)
  • RB Burns et al.

    Variability in mammography use among older women

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1996)
  • SJ McPhee et al.

    Promoting cancer screening

    A randomized, controlled trial of three interventions

    Arch Intern Med

    (1989)
  • Cited by (0)

    This research was funded in part by a National Institutes on Aging Predoctoral Traineeship, GK09 405940 31028.

    View full text