Elsevier

Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Volume 14, Issue 4, October–December 2011, Pages 422-427
Journal of Clinical Densitometry

Original Article
Closing the Postfracture Care Gap Using Administrative Health Databases: Design and Implementation of a Randomized Controlled Trial

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2011.04.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Postfracture care is suboptimal, and strategies to address this major care gap are urgently required. Case management is effective but is resource intensive and difficult to deliver to a widely scattered population. We describe the design and successful implementation of a randomized controlled trial (NCT00594789), which uses provincial administrative health databases to notify eligible physicians and patients after a major osteoporotic fracture that such fractures warrant additional assessment or pharmacologic treatment to prevent subsequent fractures. Men and women aged 50 yr or older residing in the Province of Manitoba, Canada, with a recently reported clinical fracture (hip, spine, humerus, and forearm) from medical claims data, and without recent bone mineral density (BMD) testing (in the last 3 yr) or osteoporosis therapy (in the last year), were randomized to 3 groups: group 1 received usual care, group 2 (physicians only) had mailed notification to the primary care physicians (alert letter, BMD requisition, and management flowchart), and group 3 (physicians and patient) had both physician notifications and patient notification (alert letter). During the initial 10 mo (from June 2008 to March 2009), 2901 fracture patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized. Groups were well balanced. Direct costs related to the initiative (programming, case identification, and mailings) were Canadian dollars (CAD$)12,379 during the pilot phase, which translates to CAD$6.50 per notification (groups 2 and 3). Ongoing costs (which exclude the initial programming costs) are estimated at CAD$1.25 per notification. This postfracture intervention, based on medical claims data, provides an easy way to enhance postfracture care. The approach is scalable, can be delivered to a widely scattered population, and requires minimal infrastructure. This low-cost intervention may complement more resource-intensive programs based on case managers.

Introduction

A prior fracture is one of the strongest independent predictors of osteoporosis-related fragility fractures 1, 2; yet, fewer than 20–50% of women with fragility fractures receive either bone mineral density (BMD) assessment or pharmacologic treatment 3, 4, 5, and these estimates are even lower for men 6, 7. Recent data from Manitoba, Canada, found that fewer than 20% of individuals who experience a major osteoporotic fracture receive any intervention (8). The recently released Canadian clinical practice guidelines recognize this significant care gap, and as a result, the recommendations present a significant paradigm shift from treating low BMD to preventing fragility fractures and related consequences (9).

In light of these recommendations, strategies that identify and treat those who have sustained a primary fragility fracture have the greatest potential to prevent subsequent fractures and related morbidity. Several groups have developed and implemented postfracture care strategies specifically aimed at closing the postfracture care gap 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Most have not been tested through randomized controlled methods. Others involve a multifaceted approach that—although comprehensive in their scope to identify, treat, and prevent osteoporosis at many stages—might be limited to large urban centers, as they require significant human, clinical, and financial resources 16, 17.

In Manitoba, population-based administrative health databases capture nearly all fractures treated by physicians within the provincial universal health care system. In addition, all BMD assessments performed in Manitoba since 1990 are captured in a separate database. Linkage of the BMD database to the other comprehensive, population-based, administrative health databases, capturing physician visits, hospitalizations, and outpatient prescriptions dispensed, create an unparalleled opportunity to (1) identify men and women who have sustained an osteoporotic-type fracture, (2) determine if they have previously undergone a BMD assessment or if they are currently on a prescribed antiresorptive treatment, and (3) automatically initiate contact with physicians and fracture patients who have not yet received postfracture care.

We describe the design and implementation of a randomized controlled trial, which uses the provincial administrative health databases to notify eligible physicians and patients after a major osteoporotic fracture of the spine, hip, humerus, or forearm that such fractures may warrant additional BMD assessment or pharmacologic treatment to prevent subsequent fractures.

Section snippets

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled trial (NCT00594789) in the Province of Manitoba, Canada, using administrative health data collected by the provincial ministry (Manitoba Health). Men and women aged 50 yr or older with a recently reported fracture of the hip, spine, humerus, or forearm, without recent BMD testing (within the last 3 yr) and not currently on osteoporosis therapy (no pharmacy dispensation within the last 1 yr), were randomized to 1 of 3 intervention groups. The intervention

Results

In the first year of mail-outs, which captured approx 18 mo of new reported fractures (including the 6-mo capture window at the time of the first mail-out), 2901 fracture patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were randomized to 1 of the 3 groups (Table 1). The oldest age subgroup (aged 80 yr and older) contributed the largest number of postfracture patients. Most of the fracture patients were female (65.5%), and wrist fractures were the most common fracture type reported (42.6% of

Discussion

This randomized controlled trial takes advantage of combined data sources as an innovative and cost-effective method of identifying individuals who recently sustained a major osteoporosis-type fracture, as a means of creating an automated system of notifying patients and their PCPs of the need for follow-up assessment by DXA or pharmacologic treatment.

Several other studies have examined the effect of identifying fragility fracture patients and informing both the patient and their PCP of their

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Ms. Brie DeMone and Ms. Deborah Malazdrewicz of Manitoba Health for their advice, support, personnel, and review of this initiative. They also thank Health Information Management of Manitoba Health for programming and logistical support and the use of data contained in this report (Health Information Privacy Committee file no. 2007/2008-31). The results and conclusions are those of the authors, and no official endorsement by Manitoba Health is intended or should be

References (23)

  • L. Giangregorio et al.

    Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon

    Semin Arthritis Rheum

    (2006)
  • L.L. Roos et al.

    A research registry: uses, development, and accuracy

    J Clin Epidemiol

    (1999)
  • W.D. Leslie et al.

    Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database

    J Clin Densitom

    (2005)
  • C.M. Klotzbuecher et al.

    Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2000)
  • A.B. Hodsman et al.

    10-year probability of recurrent fractures following wrist and other osteoporotic fractures in a large clinical cohort: an analysis from the Manitoba Bone Density Program

    Arch Intern Med

    (2008)
  • C.J. Metge et al.

    Postfracture care for older women: gaps between optimal care and actual care

    Can Fam Physician

    (2008)
  • A. Papaioannou et al.

    The osteoporosis care gap in Canada

    BMC Musculoskelet Disord

    (2004)
  • A. Papaioannou et al.

    The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study

    Osteoporos Int

    (2008)
  • C. Roerholt et al.

    Initiation of anti-osteoporotic therapy in patients with recent fractures: a nationwide analysis of prescription rates and persistence

    Osteoporos Int

    (2009)
  • W.D. Leslie et al.

    A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996–2008: the situation is not improving

    Osteoporos Int

    (2011)
  • A. Papaioannou et al.

    2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary

    CMAJ

    (2010)
  • Cited by (3)

    • Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: A randomized controlled trial

      2012, CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      We conducted a randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00594789) in Manitoba, Canada, using administrative health care data collected by the provincial ministry, Manitoba Health. The design and implementation of this study has been previously described.11 Briefly, eligible men and women 50 years of age or older with a recently reported fracture of the hip, spine, humerus or forearm were randomized to one of three groups.

    View full text