Review Article
Opioid Rotation: The Science and the Limitations of the Equianalgesic Dose Table

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.001Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Opioid rotation refers to a switch from one opioid to another in an effort to improve the response to analgesic therapy or reduce adverse effects. It is a common method to address the problem of poor opioid responsiveness despite optimal dose titration. Guidelines for opioid rotation are empirical and begin with the selection of a safe and reasonably effective starting dose for the new opioid, followed by dose adjustment to optimize the balance between analgesia and side effects. The selection of a starting dose must be based on an estimate of the relative potency between the existing opioid and the new one. Potency, which is defined as the dose required to produce a given effect, differs widely among opioids, and among individuals under varying conditions. To effectively rotate from one opioid to another, the new opioid must be started at a dose that will cause neither toxicity nor abstinence, and will be sufficiently efficacious in that pain is no worse than before the change. The estimate of relative potency used in calculating this starting dose has been codified on “equianalgesic dose tables,” which historically have been based on the best science available and have been used with little modification for more than 40 years. These tables, and the clinical protocols used to apply them to opioid rotation, may need revision, however, as the science underlying relative potency evolves. Review of these issues informs the use of opioid rotation in the clinical setting and defines key areas for future research.

Key Words

Opioid
opioid rotation
relative potency
equianalgesic dose
pain management

Cited by (0)

The preparation of this article was supported by an unrestricted grant from Endo Pharmaceuticals to the Department of Pain Medicine and Palliative Care, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY. The authors declare no financial conflicts with respect to this work.