Review articleInfluence of childhood sexual abuse on pregnancy, delivery, and the early postpartum period in adult women
Introduction
Thanks to the influence of the women's and the child welfare movement, childhood sexual abuse (CSA) has become a public subject and the focus of scientific research over the last several decades. Its prevalence is far higher than generally thought, and it has a great variety of effects on adult health. Obstetrician–gynaecologists and associated childbirth professionals are currently hampered by the lack of knowledge about CSA and the delayed manifestations of abuse that might occur during pregnancy, childbirth, and the mother–child relationship [1], [2]. Therefore, victims of CSA often do not obtain the adapted pre- and postnatal care, which would have favorable effects not only on their pregnancy and birth experience, but which could also open chances for a better parenthood. This review aims to provide information on the current status of research with special attention to obstetrical care.
Prevalences of CSA depend on the underlying definition. If CSA is defined as sexual contact between a child in mid-adolescence or younger and a person at least 5 years older, ranging from fondling to intercourse, the sexual victimization rate is generally considered to be around 20% for females [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Examples of different nonobstetrical study groups are presented in Table 1. Prevalences are particularly high in groups of women with known sequelae of CSA, e.g., in adolescent mothers (44%) [8], in substance-abusing pregnant patients (42%) [9], in patients with mental health problems (36–51%) [5], [10], and in battered women (53%) [11]. Although CSA is present in all socioeconomic groups, studies have shown that more severe forms of abuse appear to be associated with lower socioeconomic status [12], [13], [14]. Prevalence of sexual abuse alone is not associated with ethnic background [1], [15] or the level of education [1], and there seem to be no significant differences between countries in rates of abuse [16], [17] as long as the same definitions are applied. The true figure of CSA might be far higher [18], [19], [20] because even today girls rarely make their abuse public at the time of occurrence, and for retrospective evaluations, only parts of the CSA experiences are remembered [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. In addition, feelings of both guilt and shame are strong motives for keeping CSA a secret [19], [26], [27]. In fact, only 20–50% of incidents come to the attention of authorities [12], [13], [14], [18], [19]. The rate of women informing a physician varies between less than 2% [28] and 28% [21] depending, among others, on the reason for consulting the physician. In addition, sampling methods, methods of data collection, response rates, and the number/types of questions asked about CSA may contribute to the variability in prevalence rates [22], [23].
The question why some women develop short-term or long-term physical and psychological injury after CSA and others do not has only recently appeared in studies on CSA [13], [14]. So far, there is no developmentally sensitive model for conceptualizing those effects and continuity or discontinuity of effects over time [29]. Reactions to CSA show more individual differences [30]. There is increasing awareness among health care professionals that CSA is common and may have serious and long-term psychological and medical sequelae [13], [14], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], although there is no “postsexual abuse syndrome” [17], [32]. Between 74% and 96% of women with a history of CSA seem to present physical and emotional scars [39]. Although there is a growing list of adult diseases and symptoms associated with CSA, sequelae focusing on pregnancy, childbirth, and the early postnatal period are not known by many obstetricians. As one in five women seems to be a victim of CSA, it was the aim of our analysis to present the current knowledge on the effect of CSA on pregnancy, birth, and the early postnatal period in order to offer a basis for the improvement of obstetrical and perinatal care.
Section snippets
Sources
We intended to review the whole English, German, or French literature on this subject to gain a systematic overview on correlations. All primary and secondary literature from the reference lists found after screening the data banks Pubmed, PsycInfo, and Psyndex for publications that include the terms CSA or childhood traumatization and pregnancy, birth, delivery, labor, childbearing, breast feeding, or postpartum were reviewed for relevant data. Only complete manuscripts published after 1970
Study selection
Investigations of psychological/medical data banks and cross references revealed 43 relevant studies published between 1992 and 2005. With a few exceptions, the methodological quality of these studies was poor, but we opted to review all of the studies given the paucity of data on this important subject.
The primary studies were meta-content analyzed according to the following categories: methodology, type of data researched, and type of correlational data researched. We present descriptive
Results
As studies were very inhomogeneous and reported on different aspects of obstetric care, only descriptive results of primary studies and clinical/personal experiences can be presented.
Discussion
Although community figures for prevalences are lower than those in women presenting with known sequelae of CSA and although women after CSA will sometimes decide against a family, because they have no confidence in their ability to be a mother, a rather high percentage of women will present for obstetrical care after having experienced CSA. Given the fairly high prevalence of CSA, it is very astonishing that there are only a few studies on the sequelae of CSA on pregnancy, childbirth, and the
Pregnancy
While none of the studies demonstrates an increased rate of obstetrical diseases, several studies show an increased number of planned and unplanned prenatal consultations in women having experienced CSA. This correlation probably has to be attributed to a reduced ability to trust in their own body and in a normal pregnancy. This is emphasized by the fact that women with a history of CSA often present more stress, anxiety, and an increased depressive symptomatology during their pregnancies [44],
Conclusion
With a prevalence of around 20% of CSA, one in five women experienced CSA in her past. Despite the high prevalence and many known long-term sequelae, there are only few methodologically adequate research projects on the correlation of CSA and reproductive life. A complex system of protecting and aggravating factors in the context of CSA makes it difficult to predict the sequelae of CSA in any individual case. Overall, current data are too scant to draw a final conclusion on the correlation
References (97)
- et al.
The association of childhood sexual abuse with depressive symptoms during pregnancy, and selected pregnancy outcomes
Child Abuse Negl
(1999) - et al.
Healing from incest: resurrecting the buried self
Arch Psychiatr Nurs
(1996) The sexual abuse of Afro-American and white-American women in childhood
Child Abuse Negl
(1985)- et al.
The effects of childhood sexual abuse on minority adolescent mothers
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs
(1996) Epidemiological factors in the clinical identification of child sexual abuse
Child Abuse Negl
(1993)- et al.
The prevalence of sexual assault: a survey of 2404 puerperal women
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(1992) - et al.
The combined effects of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse during childhood: long-term health consequences for women
Child Abuse Negl
(1993) - et al.
Prevalence and risk factors for childhood sexual abuse in women: national survey findings
Child Abuse Negl
(1999) - et al.
Issues in the definition of child sexual abuse in prevalence research
Child Abuse Negl
(1986) - et al.
Health risk behaviors and medical sequelae of childhood sexual abuse
Mayo Clin Proc
(1992)