Review article
Diabetes in people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the literature

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Previous research suggests significantly higher rates of diabetes in people with ID than the general population.

  • People with ID report a basic understanding of diabetes and want to know more.

  • Existing mainstream diabetes management programmes need to be modified or developed for people with intellectual disabilities.

  • Carers report that they lack diabetes knowledge and do not routinely encourage diabetes self-management skills.

Abstract

Objective

To present an analysis of the evidence related to the prevalence of diabetes in people with intellectual disabilities (ID), their experiences of their condition and treatment and those of their carers.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature review was conducted. A total of 22 studies exploring diabetes prevalence and 5 exploring views and experiences of diabetes in people with ID were identified and included. A narrative synthesis approach was utilised to amalgamate data extracted from the included studies regarding some 49,046 participants with ID and diabetes and 31 care professionals and family members across Europe, North America, New Zealand, Australia, China and Hong Kong.

Results

Prevalence rates of diabetes in people with ID were highly varied, ranging from 0.4% to 25%. 7 studies reported significantly higher rates of diabetes in people with ID than the general population. People with ID reported a basic understanding of diabetes and wanted to know more. Carers reported that they lack diabetes knowledge and do not routinely encourage diabetes self-management skills. Several studies neglected to report vital demographic information such as participants’ level of ID (13 studies) and diabetes type (16 studies) and the quality of included prevalence studies was variable.

Conclusions

Further research in this field is required, notably prevalence studies which control for participant demographics and personal situations to obtain more accurate diabetes prevalence rates in this population group. People with ID and diabetes should be encouraged to participate in future research and we recommend exploring the feasibility of adapting current mainstream diabetes management programmes for these individuals.

Introduction

The term intellectual disabilities (ID) is characterised by significant limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive behaviours originating before age 18. People with ID typically display an IQ below 70 and limited conceptual, social, practical and adaptive skills (Schalock et al., 2010). A range of alternative terms are used internationally, such as learning disabilities (LD), developmental disabilities (DD) and, less commonly, mental retardation (MD), which essentially label the same condition. ID remains the most widespread, universally recognised term and will be utilised throughout this paper.

People with ID constitute 1–2.5% of the population in the Western world (Gillberg & Soderstrom, 2003). Studies from England (Emerson et al., 2012) and Australia (Wen, 2004) report similar prevalence rates of 2% and 2–3% respectively. It has been previously recognised that people with ID experience poorer health compared with the general population (Glover, Emerson, & Eccles, 2012) in addition to a higher prevalence of physical health conditions and significant barriers to adequate health care (Jansen, Krol, Groothoff, & Post, 2004). There is a paucity of research specifically targeting diabetes and people with ID, yet it is apparent that it is an area requiring further attention considering evidence suggesting people with ID are more likely to experience the major diabetes risk factors – poor nutrition; high fat, sugar and salt intake; high blood pressure; a sedentary lifestyle with limited physical activity and associated obesity (Bartlo and Klein, 2011, Ewing et al., 2004, McGuire et al., 2007, Merrick and Morad, 2010, Merrick et al., 2004, Mokdad et al., 2003, Sohler et al., 2009a). The worldwide prevalence of diabetes is rapidly increasing, as is the number of people dying as a consequence of diabetes-related complications (WHO, 2006). Furthermore, a 14% increase in the number of people with ID by 2021 is predicted (Emerson & Hatton, 2008) with life expectancy advancing (Bittles et al., 2002). Diabetes is, therefore, impacting on the lives of people globally and evidence points to increasing complications and risk. People with ID are more likely to experience the major risk factors associated with diabetes and are living longer. As a consequence, appropriate access to healthcare and additional resources is required yet research focusing on the distinct needs of this population remains limited.

This paper presents findings from a systematic review of the current research evidence related to diabetes and people with ID. The review systematically evaluates data obtained from a total of 27 studies. It is envisaged that examining the available literature will identify gaps in evidence which can be used to inform further research and clinical practice in this field.

  • 1.

    What is the prevalence of diabetes amongst people with ID?

  • 2.

    What are the views of people with ID on managing their diabetes and the service they receive?

  • 3.

    What are the views of carers of people with ID and diabetes regarding diabetes management and the current service provision?

Section snippets

Search strategy

The primary literature search was carried out between October and November 2013 by the lead researcher. A comprehensive computerised search of the literature was conducted using 14 English language databases: AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, ZETOX, PubMed, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, Sociological abstracts, Expanded Academic ASAP, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, Web of Knowledge and Ingenta Connect. A search strategy for each database was developed using

Search results

A flow diagram of data retrieved at each stage of the literature search can be seen in Fig. 1. A total of 27 studies (Butler et al., 2002, Cardol et al., 2012a, Cardol et al., 2012b, Chen et al., 2011, Dysch et al., 2012, de Winter et al., 2012, de Winter et al., 2013, Goldacre et al., 2004, Hale et al., 2011, Haveman et al., 2011, Havercamp et al., 2004, Hillege et al., 2013, Hoybye, 2004, Kerr et al., 2003, Lunsky et al., 2011, McDermott et al., 2006, McDermott et al., 2007, Morin et al., 2012

Discussion

The findings from the quantitative studies indicated that there is no clearly identified prevalence of diabetes in people with ID within the available literature, however, the evidence points to significantly higher prevalence rates for these individuals than the non-ID population. The results from the qualitative studies which obtained data from people with ID about managing their diabetes suggested respondents had a basic understanding of diabetes and many want to know more. People with ID

Conclusions

In conclusion, from systematically reviewing the current literature relating to people with ID and diabetes, it is apparent that further research is required to both clarify diabetes prevalence and to devise appropriate management strategies that enable family cares and professionals to better support the intellectually disabled to manage their diabetes. This is important as, in addition to one that is ageing and increasing, this population already presents with comorbid physical and mental

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author undertook the initial literature review, synthesis and write up of the results. All authors contributed to and assisted with the analysis, preparation, drafting and revising of the manuscript.

References* (58)

  • J.V. *Butler et al.

    Prevalence of, and risk factors for, physical ill-health in people with Prader–Willi syndrome: A population-based study

    Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

    (2002)
  • M. *Cardol et al.

    People with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities talking about their diabetes and how they manage

    Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

    (2012)
  • G. *Chen et al.

    A preliminary report on the medical profile of disabled persons living in Zhabei District, Shanghai, Mainland China

    Quality in Primary Care

    (2011)
  • J. Corbin et al.

    Basics of qualitative research; techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory

    (2008)
  • C.F. *de Winter et al.

    Associations of symptoms of anxiety and depression with diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in older people with intellectual disability

    Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 2013 (online)

    (2013)
  • Disability Rights Commission (DRC)

    Equal treatment: Closing the gap. A formal investigation into physical health inequalities experienced by people with learning disabilities and/or mental health problems

    (2006)
  • C. *Dysch et al.

    How do people with intellectual disabilities and diabetes experience and perceive their illness?

    Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

    (2012)
  • Effective Public Health Practice Project

    Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies

    (2008)
  • E. Emerson et al.

    Health inequalities & people with learning disabilities in the UK

    (2010)
  • E. Emerson et al.

    People with learning disabilities in England

    (2008)
  • E. Emerson et al.

    People with Learning Disabilities in England: 2011

    (2012)
  • G. Ewing et al.

    Evaluation of a cardiovascular health program for participants with mental retardation and normal learners

    Health Education and Behaviours

    (2004)
  • G. Glover et al.

    Using local data to monitor the health needs of people with learning disabilities

    (2012)
  • M.J. *Goldacre et al.

    Cancers and immune related diseases associated with Down's syndrome: A record linkage study

    Archives of Disease in Childhood

    (2004)
  • L.A. *Hale et al.

    Self-management abilities of diabetes in people with an intellectual disability living in New Zealand

    Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

    (2011)
  • K. Hannes

    Critical appraisal of qualitative research

  • M. *Haveman et al.

    Ageing and health status in adults with intellectual disabilities: Results of the European POMONA II study

    Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability

    (2011)
  • S. *Havercamp et al.

    Health disparities among adults with developmental disabilities, adults with other disabilities, and adults not reporting disability in North Carolina

    Public Health Reports

    (2004)
  • S. *Hillege et al.

    The challenges for families managing an adolescent with an intellectual disability and type 1 diabetes

    Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing

    (2013)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Patterns in the prevalence of diabetes and incidence of diabetic complications in people with and without an intellectual disability in Dutch primary care: Insights from a population-based data-linkage study

      2021, Primary Care Diabetes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous studies that tried to estimate basic insights such as the prevalence of diabetes among people with ID encountered methodological limitations such as small samples and difficulties in generalizing findings from subgroups with specific ID diagnoses to the ID population at large [7,9–15]. Prevalence rates have been found to range between 0.4 and 25%, and have been inconclusive as to whether diabetes is more prevalent than in the general population [7,16]. However, commonly observed diabetes-related risk factors such as unhealthy lifestyles and metabolic effects of psychotropic drug use, contribute to the shared belief that diabetes is more prevalent in people with ID than in the general population [17–21].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Denotes studies included in the systematic review.

    View full text