Regular ArticleHow the public classify complementary medicine: a factor analytic study
References (6)
The handbook of complementary medicine
(1989)A dictionary of mind and body
(1995)
Cited by (31)
The global use of diverse medical systems
2020, Social Science and MedicineCitation Excerpt :The description of these pluralistic medical markets captures the heterogeneity of health behaviors of both practitioners and their potential clientele (Cominsky and Scrimshaw 1980). That is, medical pluralism affords individuals the opportunity to “shop around” a range of options from the local medical marketplace (Furnham, 2000; Press, 1969, 1980). As such, seeing utilization in “neat binaries” is problematic (Smyth, 2005; Kelner et al., 2000).
What the public think about hypnosis and hypnotherapy: A narrative review of literature covering opinions and attitudes of the general public 1996–2016
2017, Complementary Therapies in MedicineCitation Excerpt :However no review covers the public’s conception of hypnotherapy, despite nearly 80 years of research.19,20 The motivation behind previous public opinion research has varied, exploring how beliefs predict outcomes,21–23 how changing attitudes may affect outcomes,24,25 how a patient group perceive hypnotherapy26 and gathering data towards a general picture of CAM.27 Some research has tried to get a picture of the beliefs of the general public,28,29 but this is inevitably limited to a single population group or culture.
Healing Practices: Alternative and Complementary
2015, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second EditionAttitudes and beliefs towards complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): A cross-cultural approach comparing Singapore and the United Kingdom
2008, Complementary Therapies in MedicineThe 'Plaice' of Language
2007, Complementary Therapies in Clinical PracticeDeveloping a measure of treatment beliefs: The complementary and alternative medicine beliefs inventory
2005, Complementary Therapies in Medicine