Reports
Diagnostic ability of general practitioners and dermatologists in discriminating pigmented skin lesions,☆☆,

https://doi.org/10.1067/mjd.2001.113442Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Early recognition of melanoma is the key in preventing metastatic disease. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic ability of general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists concerning pigmented skin lesions in general and melanoma in particular. We also investigated whether the diagnostic ability of GPs changed after a lecture on melanoma. Methods: A test set of 13 pigmented skin lesions on 35-mm color slides was presented to 160 GPs and 60 dermatologists during educational courses. Results: GPs correctly evaluated biologic behavior of the pigmented skin lesions in 72% of the evaluations. In 71% of these evaluations they correctly identified the lesions. The proportion of lesions correctly identified was positively correlated with the frequency of pigmented skin lesions in everyday practice. Dermatologists made a correct identification of the lesions in 88% of all evaluations, and they correctly evaluated biologic behavior in 94% of these. Recognition of melanoma was proportional to melanoma exposure in everyday practice. Thick melanomas were better recognized than thin melanomas in both physician groups. After a lecture on melanoma, sensitivity of GPs to recognize malignant disease increased from 72% to 84%, without a significant decrease in specificity. The proportion of lesions correctly identified also rose significantly (66% vs 52%). (J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:979-86.)

Section snippets

Methods

During 1998, a health education program on melanoma was launched for GPs in the province of East-Flanders, Belgium. The objective was to bring an update on risk groups, clinical aspects, differential diagnosis, and management of melanoma by organizing lectures on this topic. Their capacity to diagnose pigmented skin lesions was tested concurrently before and after the course. In May 1997 an invitation was addressed to all 67 GP educational groups (representing 1956 GPs) of the province. Eight

Results

There are important differences between dermatologists and GPs as to the frequency with which they are asked advice for pigmented skin lesions (Table I). Whereas 95% of the dermatologists are consulted for a pigmented lesion at least once a week and more than half of them even daily, only 18% of the GPs are presented a pigmented lesion once in a week. For most GPs (61%) such advice is asked only once every week to 2 months. Similarly the frequency of melanoma cases seen in general practice is

Discussion

The ability of physicians to recognize pigmented skin lesions and melanoma can be investigated either prospectively, retrospectively, or in an experimental setting. In the prospective setting, usually a screening program, the clinical diagnosis is compared with the eventual outcome (eg, biopsy result, patient registered in a cancer registry).4, 5, 6 Follow-up of these patients is usually elaborate, especially of those in whom no suspect lesions were noted. Hence there is a danger of

References (28)

  • JD Whited et al.

    Diagnostic accuracy and precision in assessing dermatologic disease: problem or promise?

    Arch Dermatol

    (1997)
  • HK Koh et al.

    Evaluation of melanoma/skin cancer screening in Massachusetts: preliminary results

    Cancer

    (1990)
  • MJM De Rooij et al.

    Skin cancer screening focusing on melanoma yields more selective attendance

    Arch Dermatol

    (1995)
  • SW. Becker

    Pitfalls in the diagnosis and treatment of melanoma

    Arch Dermatol

    (1954)
  • Cited by (85)

    • Palpation as a useful diagnostic tool for skin lesions

      2014, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (Belgium) (F.W.O. G.0106.96).

    ☆☆

    Reprint requests: Jean-Marie Naeyaert, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Gent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.

    J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;44:979-86

    View full text