Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
  • Log out
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Abstract

Re-utilization outcomes and costs of minor acute illness treated at family physician offices, walk-in clinics, and emergency departments.

Canadian Family Physician January 2005, 51 (1) 82-83;
M Karen Campbell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Wulf Silver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey S Hoch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Truls Østbye
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moira Stewart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Barnsley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Hutchison
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Mathews
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine Tyrrell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  1. M Karen Campbell,
  2. Rachel Wulf Silver,
  3. Jeffrey S Hoch,
  4. Truls Østbye,
  5. Moira Stewart,
  6. Jan Barnsley,
  7. Brian Hutchison,
  8. Maria Mathews and
  9. Christine Tyrrell

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE To examine factors associated with re-utilization of health services and to estimate and compare costs of treatment for minor acute illnesses in family physicians' offices (FPOs), walk-in clinics (WICs), and emergency departments (EDs).

    DESIGN Prospective cohort study using questionnaires, telephone follow up, medical chart data, and costs according to Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) schedules.

    SETTING 16 FPOs, 12 WICs, and 13 EDs in three Ontario cities.

    PARTICIPANTS Consecutive patients with one of eight predefined minor acute illnesses found in all three settings (upper respiratory infection, pharyngitis, acute bronchitis, acute otitis media, serous otitis media, low back pain, gastroenteritis, and urinary tract infection).

    MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES "Early" (< 3 days) versus "later" (3 days to 2 weeks) re-utilization of health services after initial encounter and direct cost to OHIP.

    RESULTS The overall rate of re-utilization of health services for the same episode of illness was 11.3% for early and 20.6% for later re-utilization. Factors associated with early re-utilization were initial evaluation in ED setting (odds ratio [OR] = 6.5, confidence interval [CI] = 2.2-19.2) and, regardless of setting, less satisfaction with patient-centred care (OR = 1.7 for each one-point decrease on a four-point scale; CI = 1.1-2.7). Factors associated with later re-utilization were ED setting (OR = 4.9; CI = 2.4-9.9) and diagnosis of urinary tract infection (OR = 2.4; CI = 1.1-5.2). Factors tested and found not signifcantly associated with rate of re-utilization were patients' age, sex, responses to a variety of questions assessing psychosocial factors (stress, social support, independence), and opinions on health care. Cost of care was similar for FPOs and WICs and higher for EDs for all diagnoses. The initial visit was the largest component of cost in all settings, and this component (as well as total cost) was consistently higher in EDs.

    CONCLUSION Both re-utilization rates and costs are higher for those seeking care in EDs for minor acute illness. Patient-centred care, an important feature of health care encounters regardless of setting, can reduce re-utilization rates.

    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Canadian Family Physician
    Vol. 51, Issue 1
    1 Jan 2005
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Re-utilization outcomes and costs of minor acute illness treated at family physician offices, walk-in clinics, and emergency departments.
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Re-utilization outcomes and costs of minor acute illness treated at family physician offices, walk-in clinics, and emergency departments.
    M Karen Campbell, Rachel Wulf Silver, Jeffrey S Hoch, Truls Østbye, Moira Stewart, Jan Barnsley, Brian Hutchison, Maria Mathews, Christine Tyrrell
    Canadian Family Physician Jan 2005, 51 (1) 82-83;

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Respond to this article
    Share
    Re-utilization outcomes and costs of minor acute illness treated at family physician offices, walk-in clinics, and emergency departments.
    M Karen Campbell, Rachel Wulf Silver, Jeffrey S Hoch, Truls Østbye, Moira Stewart, Jan Barnsley, Brian Hutchison, Maria Mathews, Christine Tyrrell
    Canadian Family Physician Jan 2005, 51 (1) 82-83;
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
    • Info & Metrics
    • eLetters
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • Development of the PriCARE classification for potentially preventable emergency department visits by ambulance: a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study protocol
    • Patients perceptions of access to primary care: Analysis of the QUALICOPC Patient Experiences Survey
    • A cohort study of influences, health outcomes and costs of patients' health-seeking behaviour for minor ailments from primary and emergency care settings
    • PROSpER: PReferences for the Organisation of acute health Services for oldER people: protocol for a mixed methods study
    • Can after-hours family medicine clinics represent an alternative to emergency departments?: Survey of ambulatory patients seeking after-hours care
    • Patient Satisfaction With Care for Urgent Health Problems: A Survey of Family Practice Patients
    • Reflections on the doctor-patient relationship: from evidence and experience
    • Google Scholar

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections - English
    • Collections - Française

    For Authors

    • Authors and Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Permissions
    • Terms of Use

    General Information

    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Subscribers

    Journal Services

    • Email Alerts
    • Twitter
    • RSS Feeds

    Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

    Powered by HighWire