Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Abstract

Medical errors in primary care: results of an international study of family practice.

Canadian Family Physician March 2005, 51 (3) 386-387;
Walter Rosser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Dovey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Risa Bordman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David White
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric Crighton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neil Drummond
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  1. Walter Rosser,
  2. Susan Dovey,
  3. Risa Bordman,
  4. David White,
  5. Eric Crighton and
  6. Neil Drummond

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE To describe errors Canadian family physicians found in their practices and reported to study investigators. To compare errors reported by Canadian family physicians with those reported by physicians in five other countries.

    DESIGN Analytical study of reports of errors. The Linnaeus Collaboration was formed to study medical errors in primary care. General practitioners in six countries, including a new Canadian family practice research network (Nortren), anonymously reported errors in their practices between June and December 2001. An evolving taxonomy was used to describe the types of errors reported.

    SETTING Practices in Canada, Australia, England, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the United States.

    PARTICIPANTS Family physicians in the six countries.

    MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Types of errors reported. Differences in errors reported in different countries.

    RESULTS In Canada, 15 family doctors reported 95 errors. In the other five countries, 64 doctors reported 413 errors. Although the absence of a denominator made it impossible to calculate rates of errors, Canadian doctors and doctors from the other countries reported similar proportions of errors arising from health system dysfunction and gaps in knowledge or skills. All countries reported similar proportions of laboratory and prescribing errors. Canadian doctors reported harm to patients from 39.3% of errors; other countries reported harm from 29.3% of errors. Canadian physicians considered errors "very serious" in 5.8% of instances; other countries thought them very serious in 7.1% of instances. Hospital admissions and death were among the consequences of errors reported in other countries, but these consequences were not reported in Canada.

    CONCLUSION Serious errors occur in family practice and affect patients in similar ways in Canada and other countries. Validated studies that analyze errors and record error rates are needed to better understand ways of improving patient safety in family practice.

    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this issue

    Canadian Family Physician
    Vol. 51, Issue 3
    1 Mar 2005
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by author
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Medical errors in primary care: results of an international study of family practice.
    (Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Medical errors in primary care: results of an international study of family practice.
    Walter Rosser, Susan Dovey, Risa Bordman, David White, Eric Crighton, Neil Drummond
    Canadian Family Physician Mar 2005, 51 (3) 386-387;

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Respond to this article
    Share
    Medical errors in primary care: results of an international study of family practice.
    Walter Rosser, Susan Dovey, Risa Bordman, David White, Eric Crighton, Neil Drummond
    Canadian Family Physician Mar 2005, 51 (3) 386-387;
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
    • Info & Metrics
    • eLetters
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    • No related articles found.
    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

    Cited By...

    • User redesign, testing and evaluation of the Monitoring Risk and Improving System Safety (MoRISS) checklist for the general practice work environment
    • Patient safety in ambulatory care from the patient's perspective: a retrospective, representative telephone survey
    • How safe is primary care? A systematic review
    • Improving our practice reliability: Quality improvement and patient safety
    • Ameliorer la fiabilite de notre pratique: Amelioration de la qualite et securite du patient
    • Participatory design of a preliminary safety checklist for general practice
    • Quality deviations in cancer diagnosis: prevalence and time to diagnosis in general practice
    • Achieving optimal prescribing: What can physicians do?
    • Pratiques optimales de prescription: Que peuvent faire les medecins?
    • Emotional Impact of Patient Safety Incidents on Family Physicians and Their Office Staff
    • Safety incidents in family medicine
    • No-fault compensation for treatment injury in New Zealand: identifying threats to patient safety in primary care
    • Seeking ethical approval for an international study in primary care patient safety
    • Patient report on information given, consultation time and safety in primary care
    • Safety learning system development--incident reporting component for family practice
    • What happens between visits? Adverse and potential adverse events among a low-income, urban, ambulatory population with diabetes
    • Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network
    • Patient safety events reported in general practice: a taxonomy
    • Google Scholar

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Home
    • Current Issue
    • Archive
    • Collections - English
    • Collections - Française

    For Authors

    • Authors and Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Permissions
    • Terms of Use

    General Information

    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Subscribers

    Journal Services

    • Email Alerts
    • Twitter
    • RSS Feeds

    Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

    Powered by HighWire