Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
  • Log out
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleClinical Review

Approach to managing undiagnosed chest pain

Could gastroesophageal reflux disease be the cause?

Nigel Flook, Peter Unge, Lars Agréus, Björn W. Karlson and Staffan Nilsson
Canadian Family Physician February 2007; 53 (2) 261-266;
Nigel Flook
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nflook@shaw.ca
Peter Unge
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars Agréus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Björn W. Karlson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Staffan Nilsson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Correction - July 01, 2007

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To highlight gastroesophageal reflux disease as a commoncause of undiagnosed chest pain.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION Diagnostic considerations are based on information in peer-reviewed articles retrieved from MEDLINE. Studies had to be in English and involve at least 30 subjects. Population-based studies had to have a sample size of at least 300 and a response rate of at least 60%. Thirty-seven relevant articles were found.

MAIN MESSAGE Clinical management of patients presenting with diagnostically challenging chest pain starts with a careful search for coronary artery disease and other potentially life-threatening causes. Investigations must continue until the underlying disease is identified and symptoms have been effectively controlled. Ongoing symptoms of undiagnosed chest pain cause considerable suffering, impair quality of life, and add unnecessary costs to the health care system. In more than half the patients with undiagnosed chest pain, symptoms are caused by gastroesophageal disease. Empirical acid-suppressive therapy with a proton pump inhibitor can assist clinicians in identifying patients whose symptoms are acid-related.

CONCLUSION Many patients with undiagnosed chest pain can be managed in primary care, minimizing the need for referrals and costly investigations.

This article presents an approach to management of undiagnosed chest pain, focusing on the importance of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) once physicians have determined that cardiac causes are unlikely. The management plan is based on a review of the literature by a group of experienced family physicians, a gastroenterologist, and a cardiologist. Using this management plan, family physicians can resolve most cases.

Bob’s case

Bob, a stressed entrepreneur with unexplained chest pain, is a 48-year-old businessman with a sedentary lifestyle (Table 1). He is increasingly troubled by chest pain that started more than a year ago and is getting more frequent as his work stress increases. He came to the emergency ward recently with a particularly severe episode of chest pain. After performing the usual cardiac tests, the emergency physician and the cardiologist concluded that there was a low probability of symptomatic coronary artery disease and advised Bob to visit his family doctor. Bob has made an appointment to talk to you. He remains concerned because he continues to experience chest pain and has not been given an explanation for his symptoms. He suspects something is seriously wrong, and he trusts your opinion. What will you do?

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Case profile

Sources of information

MEDLINE was searched from 1966 to June 2005 using the terms “chest wall tenderness or chest pain” and “myocardial infarction or coronary or gastroesophageal reflux” or “non-cardiac chest pain.” Inclusion criteria were that articles were in English and that clinical studies included at least 30 subjects. Population-based studies were required to have a sample size of at least 300 and a response rate of at least 60%. This search identified 37 relevant articles. Evidence supporting recommendations was graded using the Strength Of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT), where level I was the highest and level III the lowest grade.1 Conclusions are based primarily on meta-analyses, systematic reviews, high-quality cohort studies, and large population-based studies. By SORT criteria, most of these studies provided level II evidence.

Undiagnosed chest pain

Chest pain can be one of the most challenging problems managed by primary care physicians. Chest pain is a common symptom in the community, with an estimated prevalence of between 10% and 30%,2–6 yet it accounts for only about 2% of primary care consultations.7 Chest pain can be an indication of potentially life-threatening coronary artery disease (CAD), but cardiac causes account for fewer than 20% of chest pain cases in the community and primary care settings.2,7,8 Unfortunately, investigation of many patients stops once CAD has been ruled out, bypassing the critical steps needed for an accurate diagnosis and effective management of their symptoms.9 Patients whose history, physical examination, and basic diagnostic tests have not revealed the cause of their chest pain are said to have undiagnosed chest pain, because they do not appear to have cardiovascular disease or other obvious causes of their symptoms.

Investigating the cause of chest pain

Common causes of chest pain include those of musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, cardiac, pulmonary, and psychiatric origin (Table 2). Regardless of where care is given, the critical first step in managing patients with chest pain is to explore the possibility of potentially life-threatening causes of the symptoms. This often requires a few key investigations to search for evidence of CAD.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Potential causes of chest pain

Careful assessment of patients’ history is often the most helpful starting point. Historical features generally of greatest value include the quality, duration, and timing of pain, as well as its association with trauma, meals, respiration, or exertion. Unfortunately, physicians are often unable to make an accurate diagnosis based solely on history because, for example, descriptions of chest pain of cardiac, upper gastrointestinal, or gallbladder origin can be identical.10 Hence, although patients’ history is a valuable starting point, it often fails to provide a definite diagnosis because symptoms generally have poor specificity in diagnosis of chest pain (level I evidence).11,12

Similarly, physical examination rarely reveals clinical signs sufficiently specific to support an accurate diagnosis (level II evidence).11 The most common finding during examination of patients with chest pain is chest wall tenderness,8 but this is another clinical feature of low value in excluding cardiac causes of symptoms.11,13,14 It has been reported that 51% of patients with proven acute myocardial infarction have chest wall tenderness.15 Diaphoresis, a third heart sound, or hypotension might support the presence of ischemic heart disease, but have insufficient sensitivity and specificity to be helpful in most cases.11

Cardiac risk stratification is of little use, given that even in the highest risk groups, most patients’ chest pain is not caused by cardiac conditions (level II evidence).2,7,8 Only 30% of patients admitted to hospital for chest pain are found to have cardiac origins of their symptoms.16,17 Patients consulting primary care physicians for nonurgent assessment of chest pain are even less likely to have CAD. A few carefully chosen diagnostic tests are often needed to support or refute a developing diagnosis. The importance of CAD as a cause of chest pain means clinicians often need to order electrocardiograms, serum troponin assays, and exercise stress tests when carefully searching for symptomatic CAD.

Need for a definite diagnosis

Managing patients with undiagnosed chest pain is a real challenge. Once a cardiac cause for the pain is judged unlikely, patients are often dismissed without further diagnostic efforts.9 Undiagnosed chest pain results in ongoing anxiety because patients continue to experience pain and often continue to believe there is a cardiac origin for their symptoms.9 These patients need a diagnosis and access to appropriate treatment.18,19 Chest pain can be perpetuated by secondary anxiety and this, together with avoidance behaviour,20 results in a substantially diminished quality of life for undiagnosed patients.21,22

The psychological and physical suffering of patients with undiagnosed chest pain costs the health care system a great deal. In 1989, an American study calculated that initial treatment of a patient with undiagnosed chest pain cost approximately $3500 (US) per year.23 This added to a total in excess of $315 million (US) for all noncardiac cases diagnosed per year in the United States. Now, 16 years later, these costs are likely much higher.

Role of gastroesophageal reflux disease

What are the next steps for clinicians committed to providing high-quality health care for their patients with chest pain? Some population-based studies have found undiagnosed chest pain to be associated with GERD2,4,5,24,25 as well as anxiety and depression (level II evidence).2,26 The prevalence of GERD in those with undiagnosed chest pain is estimated to be greater than 50%.2,5,6,26 Prevalence of GERD is 10% to 20% in the general population.5,27 Fruergaard and colleagues16 reported the frequency of diagnoses in patients who were admitted to a coronary care unit in Denmark with unexplained chest pain. They showed that the most common causes of undiagnosed chest pain were gastrointestinal diseases, among which GERD was by far the most prominent (level II evidence) (Figure 116).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1

Frequency of diagnoses in patients admitted with acute chest pain who have not had myocardial infarctions

Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The next logical step in management of patients with undiagnosed chest pain is to consider a diagnosis of GERD. There are many ways to diagnose GERD, including pH testing, manometry, upper gastrointestinal radiography, and endoscopy.28 All the tests have limitations, such as suboptimal sensitivity, specificity, or availability, so no single test can be considered a criterion standard for diagnosing GERD.

The practical approach of symptom-based diagnosis minimizes the need for costly investigations that are often difficult to access and sometimes add little information (level I evidence).29 Symptom-based approaches use the typical features of heartburn and regurgitation to identify patients thought to have GERD. It is important to bear in mind, however, that this approach often fails to identify patients whose GERD presents predominantly as chest pain rather than typical GERD. In the Canadian Adult Dyspepsia Empiric Treatment–Prompt Endoscopy (CADET–PE) study of 1040 primary care patients with dyspepsia (level II evidence), endoscopy was carried out within a few days of entry into the study to identify clinically significant lesions that could explain each patient’s symptoms.30 The investigators found that the dominant symptoms of many patients with esophagitis were similar to symptoms of ulcer or dysmotility rather than reflux symptoms indicative of GERD. These findings confirmed earlier observations that the typical symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation can be absent in many GERD patients, including those presenting with chest pain.

For now, the inclusion of atypical symptoms, such as chest pain, as possible markers of GERD should be in the context of a careful initial assessment, close follow up, and monitoring for response to empirical treatment. A logical strategy would be to use a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to test patients for response to effective acid suppression,31,32 an approach supported by recent meta-analyses (level I evidence).33,34 It is recommended that PPIs be used for such tests because the effectiveness of diet and lifestyle advice and H2-receptor antagonists for patients with undiagnosed chest pain remains unsupported by data from randomized controlled trials. Response to PPI therapy would support the clinical hypothesis of an acid-related upper gastrointestinal disorder as the cause of the undiagnosed chest pain; the CADET–PE study identified GERD as the cause of almost all acid-related disorders in Canadian primary care dyspepsia patients.30

Issues in clinical management

Patients with undiagnosed chest pain need close follow up when they are tested with PPIs, as upper gastrointestinal symptoms can, on rare occasions, indicate serious diseases, such as cancer. Care should always be taken to identify patients who might benefit from further investigations, such as upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, because they have alarm features (Figure 229) or are advanced in age (risk of upper gastrointestinal malignancy increases each year after age 50).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2

Alarm features prompting further investigation by endoscopy29

Clinicians also need to remain alert for coexisting common conditions. Coronary artery disease and GERD are both common5,27,35,36 and can coexist in the same patient. There might even be some poorly understood connection between these 2 conditions that results in an unusually common coexistence.37,38 Identifying GERD as a cause of undiagnosed chest pain does not, therefore, exclude other causes.

Other causes of undiagnosed chest pain

In the absence of evidence for cardiac or gastrointestinal causes of undiagnosed chest pain, further investigations might be necessary. A careful history can suggest possible alternative causes in some patients; physical examination might help diagnose such causes as pneumothorax or herpes zoster. Investigations, such as oxygen saturation testing, blood-gas measurements, chest x-ray scans, ventilation or perfusion scanning, or computed tomography, might be required to identify vascular, pulmonary, and more obscure causes of chest pain. Abdominal ultrasound or CT scan might be requested for patients whose symptoms or physical findings suggest other abdominal diseases, such as gallbladder disease, as the cause.

Case resolution

Results of Bob’s cardiovascular disease investigations indicated that he was unlikely to have CAD as a cause for his symptoms. His family physician prescribed a PPI because a careful history and physical examination failed to reveal the diagnosis. This strategy was based on the working hypothesis that Bob could be experiencing atypical symptoms of GERD. Two weeks later, Bob reported nearly complete relief of his symptoms, and he was no longer worried that his symptoms were from an impending heart attack. Bob and his family physician discussed the health benefits of eating a more balanced diet and taking regular exercise, and Bob continued the course of PPI therapy. Bob and his family doctor are pleased with the outcome and remain in contact periodically to monitor Bob’s progress.

Conclusion

While managing undiagnosed chest pain can be a great challenge for primary care physicians, it is also an opportunity to provide optimal care with minimal need for costly investigations or referrals. A careful search for symptomatic cardiovascular disease followed, if necessary, by a clinical assessment for atypical GERD will provide a solid foundation for managing patients with undiagnosed chest pain.

Notes

EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

  • The causes of chest pain are many, but family doctors need to first rule out life-threatening diagnoses when patients present with symptoms.

  • Once cardiac or other serious illnesses have been ruled out, physicians should consider gastroesophageal reflux disease as most likely, because it has the highest prevalence as a cause of undiagnosed chest pain.

  • Unless patients have “red flags,” such as vomiting, bleeding, anemia, abdominal mass, weight loss, or dysphagia (and possibly are older than 50 years), a trial of a proton pump inhibitor will often eliminate symptoms and confirm the diagnosis.

  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease can present without a sense of reflux, but rather as ulcerlike pain or with dysmotility symptoms. A trial of proton pump inhibitors helps confirm the diagnosis.

POINTS DE REPèRE DU RéDACTEUR

  • Compte tenu des nombreuses causes de douleur thoracique, le médecin doit d’abord éliminer les problèmes pouvant menacer la vie du patient.

  • Après avoir exclu les problèmes cardiaques et autres maladies graves, le médecin doit penser au reflux gastro-œsophagien comme étant le diagnostic le plus probable, cette maladie étant la cause la plus fréquente de douleur thoracique d’étiologie indéterminée.

  • Sauf en présence de signes évidents tels que vomissements, hémorragie, anémie, masse abdominale, perte de poids ou dysphagie (et peut-être aussi quand le patient a plus de 50 ans), l’essai d’un inhibiteur de la pompe à protons pourra souvent soulager les symp-tômes et confirmer le diagnostic.

  • Dans le reflux gastro-œsophagien, il peut ne pas y avoir de sensation de reflux, mais plutôt de la douleur de type ulcère ou des troubles de motilité. Un essai avec un inhibiteur de la pompe à protons aidera à confirmer le diagnostic.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ebell MH,
    2. Siwek J,
    3. Weiss BD,
    4. Woolf SH,
    5. Susman J,
    6. Ewigman B,
    7. et al
    . Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician 2004;69(3):548-56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Eslick GD,
    2. Jones MP,
    3. Talley NJ
    . Non-cardiac chest pain: prevalence, risk factors, impact and consulting—a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17(9):1115-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Brattberg G,
    2. Parker MG,
    3. Thorslund M
    . A longitudinal study of pain: reported pain from middle age to old age. Clin J Pain 1997;13(2):144-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Wong WM,
    2. Lam KF,
    3. Cheng C,
    4. Hui WM,
    5. Xia HH,
    6. Lai KC,
    7. et al
    . Population based study of noncardiac chest pain in southern Chinese: prevalence, psychosocial factors and health care utilization. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10(5):707-12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Locke GR III.,
    2. Talley NJ,
    3. Fett SL,
    4. Zinsmeister AR,
    5. Melton LJ III.
    . Prevalence and clinical spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Gastroenterology 1997;112(5):1448-56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Wise JL,
    2. Locke GR,
    3. Zinsmeister AR,
    4. Talley NJ
    . Risk factors for non-cardiac chest pain in the community. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;22(10):1023-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Nilsson S,
    2. Scheike M,
    3. Engblom D,
    4. Karlsson LG,
    5. Molstad S,
    6. Akerlind I,
    7. et al
    . Chest pain and ischaemic heart disease in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2003;53(490):378-82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Klinkman MS,
    2. Stevens D,
    3. Gorenflo DW
    . Episodes of care for chest pain: a preliminary report from MIRNET. Michigan Research Network. J Fam Pract 1994;38(4):345-52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Ockene IS,
    2. Shay MJ,
    3. Alpert JS,
    4. Weiner BH,
    5. Dalen JE
    . Unexplained chest pain in patients with normal coronary arteriograms: a follow-up study of functional status. N Engl J Med 1980;303(22):1249-52.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Eslick GD
    . Usefulness of chest pain character and location as diagnostic indicators of an acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2005;95(10):1228-31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Goodacre S,
    2. Locker T,
    3. Morris F,
    4. Campbell S
    . How useful are clinical features in the diagnosis of acute, undifferentiated chest pain? Acad Emerg Med 2002;9(3):203-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Swap CJ,
    2. Nagurney JT
    . Value and limitations of chest pain history in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2005;294(20):2623-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Herr CH
    . The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department. Part 1. J Emerg Med 1992;10(4):455-61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ho M,
    2. Walker S,
    3. McGarry F,
    4. Pringle S,
    5. Pullar T
    . Chest wall tenderness is unhelpful in the diagnosis of recurrent chest pain. Q J Med 2001;94(5):267-70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. McElroy JB
    . Angina pectoris with coexisting skeletal chest pain. Am Heart J 1963;66:296-300.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Fruergaard P,
    2. Launbjerg J,
    3. Hesse B,
    4. Jorgensen F,
    5. Petri A,
    6. Eiken P,
    7. et al
    . The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1996;17(7):1028-34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Castell DO
    . Noncardiac chest pain: on the horns of a dilemma. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002;34(1):3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Coulshed DS,
    2. Eslick GD,
    3. Talley NJ
    . Non-cardiac chest pain. Patients need diagnoses. BMJ 2002;324(7342):915.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Mayou RA,
    2. Bass CM,
    3. Bryant BM
    . Management of non-cardiac chest pain: from research to clinical practice. Heart 1999;81(4):387-92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Chambers J,
    2. Bass C,
    3. Mayou R
    . Non-cardiac chest pain: assessment and management. Heart 1999;82(6):656-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Lau GK,
    2. Hui WM,
    3. Lam SK
    . Life events and daily hassles in patients with atypical chest pain. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91(10):2157-62.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Karlson BW,
    2. Wiklund I,
    3. Bengtson A,
    4. Herlitz J
    . Prognosis, severity of symptoms, and aspects of well-being among patients in whom myocardial infarction was ruled out. Clin Cardiol 1994;17(8):427-31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Richter JE,
    2. Bradley LA,
    3. Castell DO
    . Esophageal chest pain: current controversies in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy. Ann Intern Med 1989;110(1):66-78.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Ruigomez A,
    2. Rodriguez LA,
    3. Wallander MA,
    4. Johansson S,
    5. Jones R
    . Chest pain in general practice: incidence, comorbidity and mortality. Fam Pract 2006;23(2):167-74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Ruigomez A,
    2. Garcia Rodriguez LA,
    3. Wallander MA,
    4. Johansson S,
    5. Graffner H,
    6. Dent J
    . Natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease diagnosed in UK general practice. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20(7):751-60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Wong WM,
    2. Lai KC,
    3. Lam KF,
    4. Hui WM,
    5. Hu WH,
    6. Lam CL,
    7. et al
    . Prevalence, clinical spectrum and health care utilization of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in a Chinese population: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;18(6):595-604.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Dent J,
    2. El-Serag HB,
    3. Wallander MA,
    4. Johansson S
    . Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2005;54(5):710-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Richter JE
    . Diagnostic tests for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Med Sci 2003;326(5):300-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Veldhuyzen van Zanten S,
    2. Flook N,
    3. Chiba N,
    4. Armstrong D,
    5. Barkun AN,
    6. Bradette M,
    7. et al
    . An evidence-based approach to the management of uninvestigated dyspepsia in the era of Helicobacter pylori. CMAJ 2000;162(12 Suppl):S3-23.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Thomson AB,
    2. Barkun AN,
    3. Armstrong D,
    4. Chiba N,
    5. White RJ,
    6. Daniels S,
    7. et al
    . The prevalence of clinically significant endoscopic findings in primary Empiric Treatment—Prompt Endoscopy (CADET-PE) study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17(12):1481-91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Fass R,
    2. Fennerty MB,
    3. Ofman JJ,
    4. Gralnek IM,
    5. Johnson C,
    6. Camargo E,
    7. et al
    . The clinical and economic value of a short course of omeprazole in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Gastroenterology 1998;115(1):42-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Ofman JJ,
    2. Gralnek IM,
    3. Udani J,
    4. Fennerty MB,
    5. Fass R
    . The cost-effectiveness of the omeprazole test in patients with noncardiac chest pain. Am J Med 1999;107(3):219-27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Wang WH,
    2. Huang JQ,
    3. Zheng GF,
    4. Wong WM,
    5. Lam SK,
    6. Karlberg J,
    7. et al
    . Is proton pump inhibitor testing an effective approach to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with noncardiac chest pain? A meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(11):1222-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Cremonini F,
    2. Wise J,
    3. Moayyedi P,
    4. Talley NJ
    . Diagnostic and therapeutic use of proton pump inhibitors in non-cardiac chest pain: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100(6):1226-32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Ford ES,
    2. Giles WH,
    3. Croft JB
    . Prevalence of nonfatal coronary heart disease among American adults. Am Heart J 2000;139(3):371-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Carroll K,
    2. Majeed A,
    3. Firth C,
    4. Gray J
    . Prevalence and management of coronary heart disease in primary care: population-based cross-sectional study using a disease register. J Public Health Med 2003;25(1):29-35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Chauhan A,
    2. Petch MC,
    3. Schofield PM
    . Cardio-oesophageal reflex in humans as a mechanism for “linked angina”. Eur Heart J 1996;17(3):407-13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Wright RA,
    2. Miller SA,
    3. Corsello BF
    . Acid-induced esophagobronchial-cardiac reflexes in humans. Gastroenterology 1990;99(1):71-3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 53 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 53, Issue 2
1 Feb 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Approach to managing undiagnosed chest pain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Approach to managing undiagnosed chest pain
Nigel Flook, Peter Unge, Lars Agréus, Björn W. Karlson, Staffan Nilsson
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2007, 53 (2) 261-266;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Approach to managing undiagnosed chest pain
Nigel Flook, Peter Unge, Lars Agréus, Björn W. Karlson, Staffan Nilsson
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2007, 53 (2) 261-266;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Bob’s case
    • Sources of information
    • Undiagnosed chest pain
    • Investigating the cause of chest pain
    • Need for a definite diagnosis
    • Role of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    • Diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    • Issues in clinical management
    • Other causes of undiagnosed chest pain
    • Case resolution
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Correction
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Chest pain without established ischaemic heart disease in primary care patients: associated comorbidities and mortality
  • Approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease in primary care: Putting the Montreal definition into practice
  • Competing interests?
  • Response from the Editor
  • Response
  • Chest pain--consider panic disorder
  • Response
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Top studies of 2024 relevant to primary care
  • Approach to steatotic liver disease in the office
  • Foreskin care
Show more Clinical Review

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire