Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
OtherClinical Shorts

Give me a break

Canadian Family Physician March 2007; 53 (3) 494;
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We know that having a low-trauma fracture increases the risk of subsequent fracture, yet less than 30% of postmenopausal women and less than 10% of men with prior fracture are given fracture-preventive therapy. How big is the risk of subsequent fracture? Most studies attempting to answer this question have focused on women and looked at a single fracture type (eg, hip). A group of researchers in Australia decided to look more broadly at this issue. They wanted to assess the absolute risk of any subsequent fracture following initial low-trauma fracture (fracture caused by a fall from standing height or lower) in both men and women.

Set in Australia, the prospective cohort study (Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study) followed 2245 community-dwelling women and 1760 men aged 60 years or older who lived in the community from 1989 through 2005. Dubbo is a small city 400 km northwest of Sydney. Almost 99% of the population is white.

There were 905 women (40%) and 337 men (19%) who had initial low-trauma fractures. Of this group, 253 women and 71 men had subsequent fractures. The relative risk of subsequent fracture was 1.95 (95% confidence interval, 1.70–2.25) for women and 3.47 (95% confidence interval, 2.68–4.48) for men.

The absolute risk of subsequent fracture was similar for men and women and at least as great as the initial fracture risk for women 10 years older or for men 20 years older. This increase in absolute risk of fracture remained for up to 10 years. By this time, 40% to 50% of surviving men and women had subsequent fractures.

All fracture locations, other than rib (in men) and ankle (in women), resulted in increased risk of subsequent fracture, with the highest relative risks following hip and clinical vertebral fractures in younger men. In multivariate analysis, predictors of subsequent fracture in women were age, smoking, and femoral neck bone mineral density. In men, predictors were physical activity, calcium intake, and femoral neck bone mineral density.

Bottom line

  • Low-trauma fracture is a signal for increased risk of all types of subsequent osteoporotic fractures, particularly in the 10 to 15 years after initial fracture.

  • Low-trauma fracture indicates the need for early fracture-preventive therapy.

Footnotes

  • Source: Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA. Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA 2007;297:387–94.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 53 (3)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 53, Issue 3
1 Mar 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Give me a break
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Give me a break
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2007, 53 (3) 494;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Give me a break
Canadian Family Physician Mar 2007, 53 (3) 494;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Bottom line
    • Footnotes
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Seventy-two hours max
  • A nick of time?
  • Farewell gift
Show more Clinical Shorts

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire