Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
OtherDebates

Toil and trouble?: Should residents be allowed to moonlight?

YES

Sarita Verma
Canadian Family Physician October 2008; 54 (10) 1366-1368;
Sarita Verma
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sarita.verma@utoronto.ca
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Moonlighting—also known as limited licensure or restricted registration—is a highly controversial topic among medical residents. It has recently received renewed attention as Ontario launched its pilot program in restricted registration in March 2008. Moonlighting is defined as any medical-related professional activity that occurs outside the course and scope of the approved residency or fellowship program that is conducted or arranged by the individual resident or fellow—whether or not he or she receives additional compensation.

Moonlighting is not a return to the old rotating internship and general practice system. It is not a system in which residents are given an unlimited licence to practise. Rather, it represents a licence that is restricted to specialty-specific work in an area of the resident’s demonstrated competence and under supervision. This licence is also specific to sites deemed appropriate, ensuring safety to the public while allowing for the provision of services. Eight of 10 Canadian provinces currently provide for and benefit from some form of restricted registration for residents. In those provinces, anecdotal reports suggest it has been used with great success. In the United States, many states allow moonlighting, as does the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and the College of Family Physicians of Canada do not encourage or prohibit moonlighting.

Before the licensure changes of 1993, trainees received a general licence to practise medicine after completing a rotating internship; then they either practised medicine or returned for further training in a specialty. During these years of additional training, many residents worked extra shifts outside of their residency training programs, covering hospital wards and emergency departments, and providing locum tenens coverage. With a general licence, residents were able to bill their provincial Health Insurance Plans for their services.

After the 1993 licensure changes, which required residents to become certified by either the College of Family Physicians of Canada or the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada before obtaining an independent practice licence, an entire cohort of working residents and their medical services essentially vanished. This was one of the single most important policy changes that resulted in a shortage of physicians—an issue that has since then become progressively worse.

The barriers to restricted registration of residents have contributed to the dearth of available physicians to provide call, locum, and related medical services. A return to moonlighting has gained political and social validity, with the increasing scarcity of physicians, the challenges with recruitment and retention of rural doctors, and the burden of debt load on residents. As the current climate begs academia to explore models to solve these issues, moonlighting is being considered as a viable option.

Seeing the light

Moonlighting has a lot to offer. It provides residents with additional income, enabling them to repay unbearable student loans. It gives them opportunities for more clinical experience and responsibility, which enhances their educational experience. It exposes residents to communities outside the usual training sites, which facilitates recruitment to underserved areas. Moonlighting provides essential night and weekend coverage for community hospital emergency departments, and intensive adult, pediatric, and neonatal care. It enables coverage of palliative services, chronic care institutions, and all other areas in which residents are trained and competent to perform their work—including surgical assists and obstetrics coverage, in which the alternative would be no care.

One of the most widely cited motivations for residents to participate in moonlighting is to ease the burden of their loans and debts and increase their earnings,1–3 but other motivations include refinement of clinical skills, practising independent decision making, exposure to various work environments and social responsibility4 in the provision of services in rural areas and underserviced sectors, and positively enhancing the placement of physicians in rural practices. The literature reports a number of studies that examined the moonlighting practices of residents, especially in emergency medicine.4–6 There are no systematic reviews that examine the effects of restricted registration on the education, performance, and well-being of residents and their families, as well as their job placement upon completion of their residency training. This lack of evidence has led to the development of a pilot project in restricted registration in cooperation with the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

Debunking the myths

There are several myths associated with the practice of moonlighting:

Moonlighting causes sleep deprivation, depression, substance abuse, and divorce

This is untrue. Moonlighting is not the main cause of these problems and is unlikely to be the main contributor.

Workplace compliance imposed by resident collective agreements and the hard-fought successes of restricted work hours are defeated by the right to work outside the contract

Many residents work as nonmedical professionals on the side, and that work is not regulated. At present, moonlighting, which occurs because of shortages in emergency rooms and intensive care and critical care units, is an under-the-table activity. With transparent criterion-based moonlighting, we can impose restrictions on the activity and intervene if it interferes with educational performance.

There is no educational value in moonlighting

Progressive clinical exposure and graduated responsibility are inherent parts of our educational system, and evidence indicates that these elements enhance the resident’s various roles: professional, expert, scholar, manager, collaborator, communicator, and advocate.5

Residents do not know their limits

Residents are very concerned about legal liability and are able to decide for themselves what is appropriate. Employers have to meet regulatory requirements to ensure competency and supervision. By allowing Code 35, “Residency with Moonlighting,” the Canadian Medical Protective Association acknowledges the validity of this activity.

CLOSING ARGUMENTS

  • Moonlighting is a valuable activity for residents. It allows senior residents to enhance their clinical experience and provide patient care in areas where there are service shortages while earning additional income to ease the burden of their medical school debt.

  • There has been no evidence to support the claims that moonlighting causes poor academic performance or harms resident wellness.

  • It is wrong to muddle up the arguments of duty hours with those of moonlighting, as they are different issues.

  • Robust criterion-based approval processes, such as those in our Ontario pilot program, would allow programs and regulatory authorities to stop residents from moonlighting if necessary.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 1370.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    GlaspyJNMaOJSteeleMTHallJSurvey of emergency medicine resident debt status and financial planning preparednessAcad Emerg Med2005121526
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ChisholmCThe moonlighting paradoxAm J Emerg Med20001822246
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    CollierVUMcCueJDMarkusASmithLStress in medical residency: status quo after a decade of reformAnn Intern Med2002136538490
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    BaldwinDCJrDaughertySRMoonlighting and indebtedness reported by PGY2 residents: it’s not just about money!Acad Med2002Oct7710 SupplS368
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    LiJTaborRMartinezMSurvey on moonlighting practices and work requirements of emergency medicine residentsAm J Emerg Med200018214751
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    MahoodSBradelTMoonlighting by residents [Letters]Can Fam Physician20014724950
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 54 (10)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 54, Issue 10
1 Oct 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Toil and trouble?: Should residents be allowed to moonlight?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Toil and trouble?: Should residents be allowed to moonlight?
Sarita Verma
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2008, 54 (10) 1366-1368;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Toil and trouble?: Should residents be allowed to moonlight?
Sarita Verma
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2008, 54 (10) 1366-1368;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Seeing the light
    • Debunking the myths
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Surmenage et problèmes?: Devrait-on permettre le double emploi aux résidents?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Actually, a viable option
  • An unrealistic option
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Should peanut be allowed in schools?
Show more Debates

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire