Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
LetterLetter

Full disclosure

David Maxwell
Canadian Family Physician October 2008; 54 (10) 1377-1378;
David Maxwell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I note that the article on acute otitis media in children with tympanostomy tubes1 lists as a competing interest the fact that the article was “funded by RT Communications Inc,” with no further explanation. While I commend the authors for disclosing this fact, I would suggest that this disclosure is entirely inadequate to permit readers to evaluate the potential biases and conflicts of the authors, which is ultimately the whole point of including the disclosure section. While the article appears to be entirely objective and evidence-based, the credibility of its conclusions rests on the credibility of the study’s authors, who made the selection of the articles reviewed. And here we have no information to guide us. There is no statement attesting to the author’s connections, or lack of the same, with the pharmaceutical companies manufacturing the products in question. On the contrary, the reference to the funding arrangement leaves the strong impression that the whole thing was in fact engineered by a pharmaceutical company.

The whole issue of manipulation of the medical literature by the pharmaceutical industry is now very well recognized, and most journals put in place extensive controls in an attempt to avoid such abuse. As a reader I would expect 1) an explicit declaration of the relationship of each author to the pharmaceutical industry, 2) an explicit declaration of the contribution of each author to the text (Was this article ghost-written by RT Communications?), and 3) if the journal’s editors are going to accept references to shadowy agencies as “disclosure,” I would suggest that they have an obligation to include a note explaining their nature. In this instance, not one of these conditions has been met, and I am left with the strong suspicion that this review might not be quite as objective in its conclusions as it appears. I would suggest that a critical function of an editor is the preservation of the reputation of the journal as a source of credible information, free of outside influence and bias. The extensive statements of relationships with potential sources of bias now required by most journals have been put in place for precisely this reason. I would suggest that Canadian Family Physician has failed in this regard.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

Reference

  1. ↵
    SchmelzleJBirtwhistleRVTanAKWAcute otitis media in children with tympanostomy tubesCan Fam Physician20085411237
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 54 (10)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 54, Issue 10
1 Oct 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Full disclosure
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Full disclosure
David Maxwell
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2008, 54 (10) 1377-1378;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Full disclosure
David Maxwell
Canadian Family Physician Oct 2008, 54 (10) 1377-1378;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Response
  • Concern is not based on evidence
  • Rural maternity care
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire