Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
LetterLetters

Response

Michael E. Green
Canadian Family Physician November 2008; 54 (11) 1524-1525;
Michael E. Green
Kingston, Ont
MD MPH CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Adequacy of the guidelines is not the only issue.

Dr Sehmer correctly states that the 2002 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis in Canada likely need updating to reflect our current understanding of the evidence for and against screening and treatment, particularly in men. Recently meta-analyses have concluded that treatment of osteoporosis does reduce the risk of nonvertebral fractures, which has been demonstrated in a small number of trials for men, but the very low numbers of men studied limit the power to draw definitive conclusions about the efficacy of treatment—more research is therefore needed in this population.1,2 As a result, several recent publications have concluded that screening high-risk men is probably both clinically effective and cost effective, but suggest that screening be initiated based on either an estimation of absolute 10-year fracture risk as determined by a risk calculator such as FRAX (an on-line tool developed at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom) or a combination of other high-risk indicators, such as weight loss, low physical activity, or more advanced age (somewhere in the range of 70 to 80 years).3–6

As discussed in our article, there are many reasons that screening might not be carried out, with physician dissatisfaction with the quality of guidelines being an important factor. This study was a first step in describing the degree of application of this particular set of guidelines. Further studies on the reasons behind the results would be required to determine with certainty why so few men are screened, but informal feedback from colleagues suggests the guidelines themselves are not the only limiting factor. We also noted that screening rates were not substantially better for men older than 80 years of age, the group for which there is stronger evidence to support screening and treatment. We stand by our conclusion that improved screening strategies have the potential to reduce the rate of osteoporotic fractures in Canadian men.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. MacLean C,
    2. Newberry S,
    3. Maglione M,
    4. McMahon M,
    5. Ranganath V,
    6. Suttorp M,
    7. et al
    . Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med 2008;148(3):197-213. Epub 2007 Dec 17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Sawka AM,
    2. Papaioannou A,
    3. Adachi JD,
    4. Gafni A,
    5. Hanley DA,
    6. Thabane L
    . Does alendronate reduce the risk of fracture in men? A meta-analysis incorporating prior knowledge of anti-fracture efficacy in women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005;6:39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Qaseem A,
    2. Snow V,
    3. Shekelle P,
    4. Hopkins R Jr,
    5. Forciea MA,
    6. Owens DK,
    7. et al
    . Screening for osteoporosis in men: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2008;148(9):680-4. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med 2008;148(11):888.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Liu H,
    2. Paige NM,
    3. Goldzweig CL,
    4. Wong E,
    5. Zhou A,
    6. Suttorp MJ,
    7. et al
    . Screening for osteoporosis in men: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians guideline. Ann Intern Med 2008;148(9):685-701.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schousboe JT,
    2. Taylor BC,
    3. Fink HA,
    4. Kane RL,
    5. Cummings SR,
    6. Orwoll ES,
    7. et al
    . Cost-effectiveness of bone densitometry followed by treatment of osteoporosis in older men. JAMA 2007;298(6):629-37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Kanis JA,
    2. McCloskey EV,
    3. Johansson H,
    4. Strom O,
    5. Borgstrom F,
    6. Oden A,
    7. et al
    . Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX—assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 2008;19(10):1395-1408. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 54 (11)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 54, Issue 11
1 Nov 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Response
Michael E. Green
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2008, 54 (11) 1524-1525;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Response
Michael E. Green
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2008, 54 (11) 1524-1525;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Correction
  • Long-term monitoring needed for lichen sclerosus
  • Private-public partnerships not a threat to Canada’s health care system
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire