Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleCurrent Practice

Brush biopsy sampling of oral lesions

Christopher Naugler
Canadian Family Physician February 2008; 54 (2) 194;
Christopher Naugler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Oral lesions are commonly encountered in family practice and can present a diagnostic dilemma. These patients require microscopic evaluation of the lesion to rule out a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. As an excisional biopsy is often impractical in an office setting, many family physicians refer these patients to dentists or to ear, nose, and throat surgeons for a biopsy. Referring all of these cases for an initial biopsy, however, can result in a delay in diagnosis and increased costs for the patient and the health care system.

Technique

While considering options for office-based biopsies for these patients, I came across a technique called brush biopsy in the dental literature.1 I had difficulty, however, locating a description of the technique as applicable to a family practice setting. After discussing the technique with a dental colleague, I began using the method I am about to describe. I have performed this biopsy technique several dozen times in a clinical setting. It has proven to be efficient and easy to perform and it provides cytologists adequate-quality specimens for interpretation. It also has the added benefits of being minimally invasive, acceptable to patients, and presents a low risk for complications.

This technique employs materials used for Papanicolaou tests, which are generally available in any family practice office. I use a cervical cytology brush for taking the sample. I keep a separate supply of these brushes in a clean area away from the remainder of the Pap test supplies. Because this technique is noninvasive, no preparation of the oral mucosa is necessary. The operator, however, must employ standard universal precautions, including hand washing and the use of gloves. The patient’s name is written in pencil on a glass slide and kept in an easily accessible location close to the patient. The cytology brush is lightly applied to the oral lesion with just enough pressure so that the handle of the brush bows slightly.

Next, the cytology brush is rotated 360° on the surface of the lesion. It is placed at one edge of a clean glass slide and again rolled 360° over its surface. The slide is immediately sprayed with a cytofixative spray and allowed to dry. (A delay in the application of the cytofixative spray, even by a few seconds, will result in degradation of sample quality, and could provide a lower diagnostic yield.) Ensure that the specimen is labeled as a “brush biopsy of oral lesion.” If cancer is suspected clinically, ask your laboratory to expedite the report.

Applications

I have found 2 main applications of this technique. The first is for cases of oral lesions considered to be clinically low risk. In these instances, I will perform a brush biopsy; if the sample is of adequate quality for interpretation and has negative results, I will observe the lesion in my office with repeat sampling if it persists.

The second application is for cases of obviously suspicious lesions, where I will perform a brush biopsy and refer the patient to an ear, nose, and throat surgeon at the same time. Positive cytology results will often be available for surgeons at the time of their initial consultation with patients, which could considerably speed up the process of definitive surgical resection.

The biggest pitfall with this technique is the risk of false-negative results if the sample is too superficial. Dysplastic (precancerous) lesions might show normal cytology results in the upper layers of the oral mucosa; therefore, a sufficient number of cells must be removed to reach the deeper cell layers of the lesion. It has been suggested that a sufficient sample should cause pinpoint bleeding at the site of the lesion.2

False-negative test results using brush biopsies have been reported,3 so a negative pathology result must be interpreted in light of the clinical pretest probability of cancer. Highly suspicious lesions with negative brush biopsy results should be repeated, or the patient should be referred for an excisional biopsy.

Finally, exercise care in patients using blood thinners, where the risk of bleeding must be balanced with the risk of stopping the anticoagulants before the procedure takes place.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Drinnan AJ
    . Screening for oral cancer and precancer—a valuable new technique. Gen Dent 2000;48(6):656-60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Mehrotra R,
    2. Gupta A,
    3. Singh M,
    4. Ibrahim R
    . Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant or malignant oral lesions. Mol Cancer 2006;5:11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Potter TJ,
    2. Summerlin DJ,
    3. Campbell JH
    . Oral malignancies associated with negative transepithelial brush biopsy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61(6):674-7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 54 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 54, Issue 2
1 Feb 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Brush biopsy sampling of oral lesions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Brush biopsy sampling of oral lesions
Christopher Naugler
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2008, 54 (2) 194;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Brush biopsy sampling of oral lesions
Christopher Naugler
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2008, 54 (2) 194;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Technique
    • Applications
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Current Practice

  • Scurvy
  • Intraprofessional relationships
  • Safety of hair products during pregnancy
Show more Current Practice

Practice Tips

  • Tennis elbow no more
  • Medical palmistry
  • Love matters
Show more Practice Tips

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire