Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
LetterLetters

Scepticism regarding common sense

Robert F. Cooper
Canadian Family Physician May 2008; 54 (5) 681-683;
Robert F. Cooper
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Thank you for a thought-provoking article that provided a glimpse at the chasm between the current state of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and ideal clinical practice.1

While I agree that considerable scepticism is required in the interpretation of EBM and the clinical trials upon which it is based, I submit that common sense requires at least as much scepticism in its implementation.

The human brain is not particularly good at accurately identifying patterns. For example, who among us has never seen a familiar shape (eg, dog, cat, bird, or, my personal favourite, Snoopy) in the clouds? Of course, whatever shape you see, it is not really present in the random pattern of the clouds. To oversimplify considerably, the clouds contain enough cues that your brain is able to gather them together to produce the impression, sometimes a rather strong impression, of a familiar pattern.

Our remarkable, and quite enjoyable, ability to see patterns like these in clouds can be summarized in this way: humans have an innate ability to collect cues from random patterns and assemble them into the impression of a non-random pattern.

Two paragraphs about seeing patterns in clouds don’t amount to much, unless this habit of seeing patterns where there aren’t any occurs in our medical thinking as well as our visual processing. Unfortunately, the history of medicine is riddled with fallout from this kind of thinking, including the examples—bleeding patients and administering mercuric chloride—cited in Dr Sherman’s article.1 Whether it was drilling holes in people’s heads to relieve headaches or bleeding the remaining strength out of already-sick people, well-intentioned physicians have visited appalling, and sometimes lethal, treatments upon their patients for the simple reason that, at the time, they seemed to work.

I will omit a discussion of the other cognitive “shortcuts” that further degrade our ability to accurately discern the effectiveness of an intervention without the help of a structured trial and some statistical analysis. Unfortunately, their existence is supported by the observation that, as far as I know, many of the positive changes cited by Dr Sherman—including hand washing and decreased use of phlebotomy and hormone replacement therapy—were brought about in large part by the advent of statistical analysis in the early 1800s (I believe it seeped into medicine in the mid-to-late 1800s), allowing medical practitioners to objectively assess their time-honoured interventions. With each new piece of objective evidence, they had to adjust their thinking, and practice, accordingly.

I further assert that any intervention, complementary and alternative medicine or otherwise, that has not been proven effective in a well-designed trial remains in the same category as over zealous phlebotomy and hormone replacement therapy. That is not to say it cannot possibly be effective, but we must also consider the possibility that its use might be based entirely on the impression of a pattern that isn’t really there, just like a shape perceived in the clouds. Certainly, Sherman’s suggestion that our knowledge of physiology can be helpful in clinical decision making could be employed here, but the frequent failure of physiologically sound treatments to produce experimentally detectable benefits must be kept clearly in mind. As well, the amount of time that a belief has held sway (eg, the thousands of years that ginseng has been used) should not protect it from this consideration; I hope we can agree that people, including physicians, have a habit of seeing what they expect to see. This cognitive “habit” could be expected to insulate the assertions of respected teachers from contradictory observations in generation after generation.

In summary, then, while I agree that EBM certainly deserves considerable scepticism in its implementation, the enticing notion that the gaps in EBM can be filled with clinical judgement and common sense should receive a healthy dose of scepticism too.

(I’m sure that there are many resources that address the misleading cognitive shortcuts of the human mind. One I found very accessible and useful was How to Think Straight About Psychology.2)

Footnotes

  • Editor’s note

    For more reader responses on the roles of common sense, evidence-based medicine, and complementary therapies, visit Rapid Responses on www.cfp.ca.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    ShermanMEvidence-based common sense?Can Fam Physician2008541668 (Eng)16971 (Fr)
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    StanovichKHow to think straight about psychology8Cranbury, NJAllyn and Bacon2006
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 54 (5)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 54, Issue 5
1 May 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Scepticism regarding common sense
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Scepticism regarding common sense
Robert F. Cooper
Canadian Family Physician May 2008, 54 (5) 681-683;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Scepticism regarding common sense
Robert F. Cooper
Canadian Family Physician May 2008, 54 (5) 681-683;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Correction
  • Long-term monitoring needed for lichen sclerosus
  • Private-public partnerships not a threat to Canada’s health care system
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire