Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
OtherDebates

Should palliative care be a specialty?

YES

Joshua Shadd
Canadian Family Physician June 2008; 54 (6) 840-842;
Joshua Shadd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shaddj@kgh.kari.net
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Palliative medicine is the medical branch of the inter-professional approach known as palliative care. Because the doctor-patient relationship itself is the key to good palliative medicine, family physicians are ideally suited to providing palliative care. Physicians do not need to be palliative medicine specialists to provide excellent palliative care. This truth, however, does not eliminate the need for physicians who focus exclusively on this domain and possess specialized knowledge and skills in the care of patients with complex palliative needs. An argument in favour of palliative medicine being a specialty is not an argument against the ability of, or need for, family physicians to remain the primary providers of palliative care in Canada. Palliative medicine should, in fact, be considered a subspecialty in Canada.

A subspecialty is a branch of medicine that requires additional training after completion of a primary residency (eg, endocrinology after internal medicine), as opposed to a specialty that is entered directly from medical school (eg, psychiatry).1 Until family medicine was acknowledged by the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC) to be a specialty in 2007, all specialists and subspecialists in Canada received their credentials from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC). The RCPSC identifies 5 criteria for recognition of a subspecialty,2 all of which are fulfilled by palliative medicine in Canada.

Criterion 1: A subspecialty has an in-depth body of knowledge beyond the scope of the foundational specialty

In 2003, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research created a $12 million funding program dedicated to research in palliative and end-of-life care.3 There are now at least 10 major dedicated scientific journals, many new textbooks being published every year, and annual international research meetings on 5 continents on the subject of palliative care. It is simply not possible for busy generalists to maintain a comprehensive knowledge of the field. Arguing against palliative medicine as a subspecialty puts exactly that unachievable responsibility on the back of every generalist. Family physicians treat congestive heart failure, but that does not mean that cardiology is not a subspecialty. Most palliative care does not require the services of a palliative medicine subspecialist, but that does not mean that palliative medicine subspecialists are unnecessary.

Criterion 2: A subspecialty has identifiable competencies that build on foundational specialty training

Identifiable competencies have been clearly articulated through the CFPC and RCPSC conjoint accreditation process for palliative medicine training programs since 1999. The broad domains of competency are, of course, similar for primary and subspecialty palliative care providers. They have comparable levels of expected competency in some domains (eg, interprofessional collaboration skills). In other domains, such as symptom management, however, the level of expected competency is substantially different, justifying the existence of a cadre of physicians (subspecialists) dedicated to advancing these competencies.

Criterion 3: There must be evidence of a need for subspecialists

Canada can be justifiably proud of advances made during the past 30 years in care of patients with palliative needs. Good access to high-quality primary and subspecialty palliative care at home, in clinics, and in long-term care facilities and hospitals is far from universal. Recognition of the subspecialty of palliative medicine will not automatically guarantee appropriate supply and distribution of primary and subspecialty physician resources, but it is one important element of what must be a comprehensive strategy for building palliative care capacity at all levels.

Criterion 4: The change in scope of practice must not adversely affect any field of medicine

While it is impossible to prove prospectively that there would be no detrimental effects, there is no reason to believe that the existence of a recognized subspecialty in palliative medicine is likely to harm family medicine any more than the existence of a subspecialty in endocrinology. Some argue that increasing the availability of subspecialty resources would, in fact, encourage greater provision of primary palliative care as primary physicians would have the assurance of good backup if they need it.

Criterion 5: There must be adequate infrastructure to sustain the subspecialty, including a professional organization and recognition in other jurisdictions

Palliative medicine is a recognized subspecialty in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Ireland, and 5 other countries in Europe.4 The Canadian Society of Palliative Care Physicians was established in 1994 and is the primary national voice for palliative medicine. The Society is involved in research and advocacy, and coordinates national efforts in undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education.

In summary, palliative medicine in Canada meets the RCPSC standard for a subspecialty, and it is legitimate to think of the discipline as a subspecialty. But it is a unique subspecialty that must be accessible to physicians from both CFPC and RCPSC training streams. While the concept of family medicine as a path to a subspecialty is new in Canada, international precedents exist. Australasia, the United Kingdom, and the United States all recognize palliative medicine subspecialists from both family medicine and other specialty backgrounds.

One question must guide every decision about training or credentialing of physicians: In the long run, is this likely to improve the care of patients? When cardiology was first recognized by the RCPSC in 1965, the tools of the newly minted specialty consisted of acetylsalicylic acid, nitroglycerine, hydrochlorothiazide, propranolol, and the electrocardiogram. It was the creation of the specialty that laid the foundation for subsequent advances.

The discussion about palliative medicine as a subspecialty must take a similar long-term view. Palliative medicine is a subspecialty that is, and must remain, intrinsic to family medicine. This is precisely why family physicians are ideally suited to creating a subspecialty of palliative medicine that will embrace the distinct contributions of physicians trained through the CFPC or the RCPSC. Our children will be glad we did.

Notes

CLOSING ARGUMENTS

  • Family physicians can and should provide most palliative care in Canada, but there remains a role for physicians trained and focused exclusively on palliative medicine.

  • Palliative medicine in Canada clearly meets the criteria of a subspecialty.

  • In the long run, Canadian patients will benefit from the existence of a recognized subspecialty of palliative medicine accessible to physicians with backgrounds in family medicine or other specialties.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 844

  • The parties in this debate will refute each other’s arguments in rebuttals to be published in an upcoming issue.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    Von GuntenCFLupuDRecognizing palliative medicine as a subspecialty: what does it mean for oncology?J Support Oncol2004216674
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaCriteria for RCPSC recognition of a specialty and subspecialtyOttawa, ONRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada2006Available from: http://rcpsc.medical.org/publications/policy/accreditation_e.htmlAccessed 2007 November 27
  3. ↵
    Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Cancer ResearchPalliative and end-of-life careOttawa, ONCanadian Institutes of Health Research2005Available from: www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/22757.htmlAccessed 2007 November 27
  4. ↵
    CentenoCClarkDLynchTRocafortJGreenwoodAFloresLAEAPC atlas of palliative care in EuropeHouston, TXIAHPC Press2007
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 54 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 54, Issue 6
1 Jun 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should palliative care be a specialty?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Should palliative care be a specialty?
Joshua Shadd
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2008, 54 (6) 840-842;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Should palliative care be a specialty?
Joshua Shadd
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2008, 54 (6) 840-842;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Criterion 1: A subspecialty has an in-depth body of knowledge beyond the scope of the foundational specialty
    • Criterion 2: A subspecialty has identifiable competencies that build on foundational specialty training
    • Criterion 3: There must be evidence of a need for subspecialists
    • Criterion 4: The change in scope of practice must not adversely affect any field of medicine
    • Criterion 5: There must be adequate infrastructure to sustain the subspecialty, including a professional organization and recognition in other jurisdictions
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • La médecine palliative est-elle une spécialité?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Family Medicine Hospitalists Three Years Out of Residency: Career Flexibility or a Threat to Office-Based Family Medicine?
  • Identification of the physician workforce providing palliative care in Ontario using administrative claims data
  • Palliative care is a specialty
  • Subspecialties in family medicine: a question of values
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Should peanut be allowed in schools?
Show more Debates

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire