Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
  • Log out
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherFP Watch

Environmental scans

How useful are they for primary care research?

Paul Graham, Trina Evitts and Roanne Thomas-MacLean
Canadian Family Physician July 2008, 54 (7) 1022-1023;
Paul Graham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: paul.graham@arts.usask.ca
Trina Evitts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roanne Thomas-MacLean
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

[T]he focus shifts the locus of change from the individual to the environment in which the individual resides. Such a shift can provide crucial insight into realistic expectations related to health behaviors and the utilization of health services. By examining environmental or contextual factors, researchers can collect data to guide the design of effective health programs uniquely tailored to the needs of the communities.

Rowel et al1

Environmental scans (ESs) originated in a business context as a tool for retrieving and organizing data for decision making.2,3 Environmental scans have been mainly used to investigate external factors that are interpreted as keys to success and affect the future of an organization.4,5 These scans are used to provide decision makers with knowledge about current social, economic, technological, and political contexts, and to identify any potential short- and long-term shifts. Equally important, ESs provide an opportunity for an organization to envision and plan for its future, given these contexts and shifts. The United Way of America engaged in comprehensive scanning to chart its future in the early 1980s.6,7 Since then, ESs have been growing in use and complexity.

Environmental scans have recently been used by health researchers to address mental health, nutrition, women’s health, aboriginal issues, health and housing, and knowledge transfer.1 A goal of ESs includes the design of health programs that are geared toward and incorporate the needs of specific communities. In all domains, ESs are designed to help plan for the future, to provide evidence about the directions of an organization or profession, to raise awareness of issues, or to initiate a project.5 Because of the increasing use of ESs in health research, it is important for health care professionals to have some knowledge of what these scans entail in order to critically assess and evaluate their potential impact on health care, and to determine whether or not they might be a useful tool in primary care research and delivery. Environmental scans can also assist health organizations with the development of evidence-based policies.

Scope of the environment

The main sources of data for an ES include both internal and external sources. An “internal assessment”5 of a project or an organization can involve memos, personal communications, minutes of meetings, or other internal documents. The use of these internal documents is one of the advantages of an ES because it does not dismiss the valuable sources of information that exist in day-today work. However, an organization (or a professional group) is also affected by external trends, and accounting for these trends is central to an ES. External trends can include the political and social context, economic shifts, and, particularly for public health and medicine, technological change. Data can be derived from corporate sources as well as government or academia.6,7

Environmental scans allow the researcher, clinician, or policy maker to account for diverse types of knowledge. These types of knowledge are codified knowledge (data collected from clinical reviews, policy documents, or statistics) and tacit knowledge (data collected from face-to-face meetings or focus groups, or by e-mail or telephone). This distinction is recognized in both the knowledge management and the transfer of literature valuable for research and strategic planning.8–10

Environmental scans can involve a range of target populations or subjects; one can scan organizations, work units and services, project dynamics, health services, and communities, such as health professionals or those targeted for health service interventions.6,11–14 Given the multiple sources of data, varying target populations or subjects, and types of knowledge, it is difficult to provide an overarching framework for ESs, except to say that they usually entail a combination of a literature review (eg, systematic, critical, or exploratory), a short survey, a focus group or interview with key stakeholders, and some form of program planning.

Although the field is still developing, there are several modes of ESs that health organizations can use, relative to the complexity of the environment, the perceived availability of information, and the extent to which the organization is willing to “intrude” on the environment to collect data.15 Based on previous work by Aguilar2 and Choo,15 these modes can be loosely allocated into the following categories:

Passive approach (i e , collecting existing knowledge)

The passive approach involves “casual and opportunistic”15 data collection from already established external contacts, or more focused data collection from well-respected existing sources, such as industry databases or published documents.

Active approach (ie, creating new knowledge)

The active approach involves an organization taking action and analyzing reactions, and creating data-collection tools to obtain “rigorous and objective” data. In both cases, the active approach is accompanied by a willingness to “revise or update existing knowledge.”15

Evaluation

There still lacks a specific measure of effectiveness of scanning, mainly because of the diverse approaches inherent in this activity; many health ESs are descriptive in nature, making health professionals aware of issues.16,17 An evaluation of any ES will depend upon the particular goals, modes, and methods chosen. For instance, Rowel et al1 sought to increase cancer screening among African Americans and used their ES to devise interventions. Using both passive and active modes, they found that face-to-face meetings were best for community outreach and that it was important to train volunteers and staff “to be sensitive to ‘manhood’ issues associated with prostate cancer–screening.”1 In this instance, the ES was considered effective, as it fostered the development of a pilot prostate cancer screening project; the program resulted in 312 men being screened in contrast to 169 men by a similar organization in the area.1

Current application

Some current work by R.T.M includes applying an ES method to mentoring programs for family physicians. The active approach to collecting data is being conducted to determine what types of physician mentorship programs are in place in Canada. The data collection involves a program of formal interviews, which requires a dedicated research assistant, accompanied by informal telephone conversations based on 2 focus questions and a basic review of programs via Internet searches. These informal tools—telephone calls and Internet searches—not only provide support for the formal, academically oriented surveys, but also allow for networking between interested researchers, practitioners, and other leaders and teachers who want to know more about the mentorship model and who might want to apply the model when it is completed.

Conclusion

Environmental scans are now a recognized and valuable tool in health decision making. The ES method—particularly if it’s designed in consultation with an information specialist or librarian—provides evidence for policy and decision making, and program planning. The diversity of sources and types of data gathered in ESs have resulted in effective planning and program implementation in various sectors. As a tool to systematize knowledge, ESs can guide health organizations and projects, leading to evidence-based solutions to health care issues.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Hypothesis is a quarterly series in Canadian Family Physician, coordinated by the Section of Researchers of the College of Family Physicians of Canada. The goal is to explore clinically relevant research concepts for all CFP readers. Submissions are invited from researchers and nonresearchers. Please send any ideas or submissions to Dr Bo Miedema at bo.miedema{at}rvh.nb.ca.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    RowelRMooreNDNowrojeeSMemiahPBronnerYThe utility of the environmental scan for public health practice: lessons from an urban program to increase cancer screeningJ Natl Med Assoc200597452734
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    AguilarFJScanning the business environmentNew York, NYThe Macmillan Company1967
  3. ↵
    ReichelAPrebleJFEnvironmental scanning for the hospitality industryJ Hospital Tour Res1984913854
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    MuralidharanREnvironmental scanning and strategic decisions in multinational corporationsMultinat Bus Rev20031116787
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    AlbrightKSEnvironmental scanning: radar for successInf Man J20043833845
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    United Way of AmericaWhat lies ahead: a glimpse of the 1980s and the driving forces that will shape the decade ahead. An environmental scan reportAlexandria, VAUnited Way of America, Long Range Planning Division1980
  7. ↵
    United Way of AmericaWhat lies ahead: a new look. An environmental scan reportAlexandria, VAUnited Way of America, Long Range Planning Division1983
  8. ↵
    HansenMTNohriaNTierneyTWhat’s your strategy for managing knowledge?Harv Bus Rev199977210616
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. YinRKGwaltneyMKKnowledge utilization as a networking processKnowledge19812455580
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    KnottJHWildavskyAIf dissemination is the solution, what is the problem?Knowledge19801453778
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    ReidDInterloan services in New Zealand: What do the research results reveal?Interlend Doc Sup2005334196202
    OpenUrl
  12. Pena-MoraFVadhavkarSPerkinsEWeberTInformation technology planning framework for large-scale projectsJ Comput Civil Eng199913422637
    OpenUrl
  13. DabelaGAAn environmental scan of state and local healthcare reform efforts [master’s project]Philadelphia, PADrexel University2006Available from: www.wrgh.org/docs/EnvironScan_Final.pdfAccessed 2008 May 22
  14. ↵
    BarkerKKBoscoCOandasanIFFactors in implementing interprofessional education and collaborative practice initiatives: findings from key informant interviewsJ Interprof Care200519Suppl 116676
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    ChooCWEnvironmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learningInformation Research200171Available from: http://informationr.net/ir/7-1/paper112.htmlAccessed 2008 May 22
  16. ↵
    ThomasGAddiction treatment indicators in Canada: an environmental scanPublished June 2005. Available from: www.ccsa.ca/pdf/ccsa-011132-2005.pdfAccessed 2008 May 22
  17. ↵
    BuellMCarryCKorhonenMAnawakRFetal alcohol spectrum disorder: An environmental scan of services and gaps in Inuit communitiesPublished 2006. Available from: www.naho.ca/inuit/english/documents/2006InuitFASDe-scan.pdfAccessed 2008 May 22
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 54 (7)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 54, Issue 7
1 Jul 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Environmental scans
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Environmental scans
Paul Graham, Trina Evitts, Roanne Thomas-MacLean
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2008, 54 (7) 1022-1023;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Environmental scans
Paul Graham, Trina Evitts, Roanne Thomas-MacLean
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2008, 54 (7) 1022-1023;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Scope of the environment
    • Evaluation
    • Current application
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Patient navigation programs in Alberta, Canada: an environmental scan
  • Innovative Wellness Models to Support Advancement and Retention Among Women Physicians
  • Technology-Enabled and Artificial Intelligence Support for Pre-Visit Planning in Ambulatory Care: Findings From an Environmental Scan
  • National Priorities for High-quality Rheumatology Transition Care for Youth in Canada
  • Service delivery models for injectable opioid agonist treatment in Canada: 2 sequential environmental scans
  • The use of the environmental scan in health services delivery research: a scoping review protocol
  • Online decision aids for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: systematic search, evaluation of quality and suitability for low health literacy patients
  • Recommendations for successful sensory screening in older adults with dementia in long-term care: a qualitative environmental scan of Canadian specialists
  • Documenting coordination of cancer care between primary care providers and oncology specialists in Canada
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

FP Watch

  • Use of nonvitamin dietary supplements with prescription medications
  • Elliptical excision
  • Hospitalist care
Show more FP Watch

Hypothesis

  • Recognition of inherent biases in administrative data
  • The Canadian Primary Care Information Network
  • Impact of patient partner co-design on survey development in primary care research
Show more Hypothesis

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire