Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • CFP AI policy
    • Politique du MFC en matière d'IA
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • CFP AI policy
    • Politique du MFC en matière d'IA
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleResearch

Women’s views on reminder letters for screening mammography

Mixed methods study of women from 23 family health networks

Janusz Kaczorowski, Tina Karwalajtys, Lynne Lohfeld, Stephanie Laryea, Kelly Anderson, Stefanie Roder and Rolf J. Sebaldt
Canadian Family Physician June 2009; 55 (6) 622-623.e4;
Janusz Kaczorowski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tina Karwalajtys
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynne Lohfeld
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Laryea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly Anderson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefanie Roder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rolf J. Sebaldt
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To explore women’s perspectives on the acceptability and content of reminder letters for screening mammography from their family physicians, as well as such letters’ effect on screening intentions.

DESIGN Cross-sectional mailed survey followed by focus groups with a subgroup of respondents.

SETTING Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS One family physician was randomly selected from each of 23 family health networks and primary care networks participating in a demonstration project to increase the delivery of preventive services. From the practice roster of each physician, up to 35 randomly selected women aged 50 to 69 years who were due or overdue for screening mammograms and who had received reminder letters from their family physicians within the past 6 months were surveyed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Recall of having received reminder letters and of their content, influence of the letters on decisions to have mammograms, and interest in receiving future reminder letters. Focus group interviews with survey respondents explored the survey findings in greater depth using a standardized interview guide.

RESULTS The response rate to the survey was 55.7% (384 of 689), and 45.1% (173 of 384) of responding women reported having mammograms in the past 6 months. Among women who recalled receiving letters and either making appointments for or having mammograms, 74.8% (122 of 163) indicated that the letters substantially influenced their decisions. Most respondents (77.1% [296 of 384]) indicated that they would like to continue to receive reminders, and 28.9% (111 of 384) indicated that they would like to receive additional information about mammograms. Participants in 2 focus groups (n = 3 and n = 5) indicated that they thought letters reflected a positive attitude of physicians toward mammography screening. They also commented that newly eligible women had different information needs than women who had had mammograms done in the past.

CONCLUSION Reminder letters were considered by participants to be useful and appeared to influence women’s decisions to undergo mammography screening.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 55 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 55, Issue 6
1 Jun 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Women’s views on reminder letters for screening mammography
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Women’s views on reminder letters for screening mammography
Janusz Kaczorowski, Tina Karwalajtys, Lynne Lohfeld, Stephanie Laryea, Kelly Anderson, Stefanie Roder, Rolf J. Sebaldt
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2009, 55 (6) 622-623.e4;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Women’s views on reminder letters for screening mammography
Janusz Kaczorowski, Tina Karwalajtys, Lynne Lohfeld, Stephanie Laryea, Kelly Anderson, Stefanie Roder, Rolf J. Sebaldt
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2009, 55 (6) 622-623.e4;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates
  • ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: Family physician perceptions
  • Pay-for-performance incentives for preventive care: Views of family physicians before and after participation in a reminder and recall project (P-PROMPT)
  • A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association between family physician gender and patient service times
  • Generalism as a cross-disciplinary practice in medicine
  • Uptake and feasibility of HPV self-sampling among patients of a Canadian family medicine clinic
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Collection française
    • Résumés de recherche

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2026 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire