Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
OtherReflections

Nothing to do but wait

A home delivery in 1892

Ian Cameron
Canadian Family Physician June 2009; 55 (6) 626-627;
Ian Cameron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose eLetter

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • In Response to Nothing to do But Wait: A Home Delivery in 1892
    Carrie Schram
    Published on: 02 July 2009
  • Published on: (2 July 2009)
    Page navigation anchor for In Response to Nothing to do But Wait: A Home Delivery in 1892
    In Response to Nothing to do But Wait: A Home Delivery in 1892
    • Carrie Schram, Family Medicine, PGY2

    The historical account submitted by Dr. Ian Cameron in the June 2009 issue of Canadian Family Physician detailed a remarkable story of a home birth performed by Dr. Charles Webster in 1892. Beautifully written and containing excerpts from the original account by Dr. Webster in 1939, the story contains vivid imagery and highlights the physical as well as medical obstacles present in the late 19th century. The story conc...

    Show More

    The historical account submitted by Dr. Ian Cameron in the June 2009 issue of Canadian Family Physician detailed a remarkable story of a home birth performed by Dr. Charles Webster in 1892. Beautifully written and containing excerpts from the original account by Dr. Webster in 1939, the story contains vivid imagery and highlights the physical as well as medical obstacles present in the late 19th century. The story concludes with the delivery of a stillborn child, along with some practical and medical lessons for the physician.

    The epilogue of the article, however, presents cause for concern. A brief reference is made between a declining maternal mortality rate and an increased rate of women giving birth in hospital, suggesting that the shift from women giving birth at home to hospital resulted in reduced risk to the mother. While over many years this has in fact been the case (the maternal mortality rate in Canada did in fact decrease from the late 19th century to the 1920’s to the mid 20th century to present), to link this to an increase in hospital births as opposed to home births is misleading. In fact, when women initially began giving birth in hospital the maternal mortality rate increased and it wasn’t until great changes were made to the practice of obstetrics in hospital occurred that the rate declined and the remarkably low rates of maternal mortality we have today were achieved.

    It is undeniably true that from the late 19th century until the middle of the 20th century there was a dramatic change in the obstetrical care of women. In the late 19th century, although more physicians (which at that time also meant more males) were becoming involved in obstetrical care and were replacing midwives, who were overwhelmingly female , , . In addition, women began to give birth in hospitals and the proportion of women doing so steadily increased throughout this period1,2, . Lastly, the maternal mortality as well as infant mortality rate declined sharply in Canada during this time. However, the transition was not entirely smooth or without consequences.

    The New York Maternal Mortality Study was funded by the Commonwealth Fund and conducted by the New York Academy of Medicine from 1930-32 . The study found that home births attended to by midwives during this time actually had the lowest maternal death rate and that approximately 2/3 of the maternal deaths that occurred in hospital were preventable. This result was evident despite the fact that maternal death was attributed a midwife if she had attended to the patient at all, including in the event that the patient was later brought to a hospital, and a physician became involved. The causes of maternal death, in order of prevalence, were found to be puerperal sepsis, eclampsia, hemorrhage, and accidents. While this study is American, maternal mortality in association with hospital birth was also seen as a concern in Canada3. In addition, just as American physicians attempted to pass responsibility for maternal mortality onto midwives, so too did physicians in Canada3.

    The publication of this study resulted in much debate. Physicians, and in particular obstetricians were understandably upset by the results and many argued against the validity of the study. Subsequent studies were performed and ultimately the conclusion, that in hospital obstetrical care of women contained unnecessary risk, was accepted. Over time, acknowledgement of this risk resulted in changes in the practice of obstetrics and, along with scientific advancement such as the discovery of antibiotics in 1929, the maternal mortality rate declined to where it is today.

    Overall, we as physicians have much to be proud of. Medicine has changed dramatically since the late 19th century, a short time by historical standards. Nevertheless, it is important for us to remember that the improvements in care and reductions in mortality that have occurred have not always been straightforward and without consequence. It is important for us to remain humble and to respect our past and understand that just as we appreciate the challenges and at times the errors of our predecessors, so too will physicians of the future look back on see the limitations of our knowledge and practice in the years to come.

    Ehrenreich, B. and D. English. For Her Own Good: 150 Years of Experts' Advice to Women (Garden City: Anchor Books, 1989)

    Leavitt, J. W. Brought to Bed: Birthing Women and their Physicians in America, 1750 to 1950 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986)

    Mitchinson,W. Birth in Canada 1900 to 1950, University of Toronto Press, 2002

    Wertz, D. C. and R. W. Wertz. Lying In; a History of Childbirth in America (expanded edition published 1989 by Richard W. Wertz and Dorothy C. Wertz) (New York: Free Press; London: Macmillan, 1977

    King C. R., The New York maternal mortality study: a conflict of professionalization, Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 65(4):476-502, 1991.

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 55 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 55, Issue 6
1 Jun 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nothing to do but wait
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Nothing to do but wait
Ian Cameron
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2009, 55 (6) 626-627;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Nothing to do but wait
Ian Cameron
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2009, 55 (6) 626-627;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Commentary
    • Epilogue
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Whats sewn in
  • Maternal history
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Reflections

  • What they teach us
  • Communion in the clinic
  • Hello from the other side
Show more Reflections

Historicals

  • A sleep and a forgetting
  • Dr William Osler
  • Victor Johnston, Murray Stalker, and the revival of general practice
Show more Historicals

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire