Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
  • Log out
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
OtherDebates

Should family physicians treat themselves or not?

NO

Suzanne Richer
Canadian Family Physician August 2009, 55 (8) 781-782;
Suzanne Richer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: sricher@cmq.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • CFPlus
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

To answer the question of whether physicians should or should not treat themselves, we need look no further than the Code of Ethics of Physicians (for Quebec). It expressly states, “A physician must, except in an emergency or in cases which are manifestly not serious, refrain from treating himself.”1

This general rule has 2 clear exceptions. The first is an emergency, such as an acute and potentially fatal condition for which the physician must treat himself while awaiting the required assistance. Fortunately, it is rarely necessary to make this exception. The second exception applies to minor and commonplace conditions, which occur much more frequently. The classic example is tonsillitis. Apart from these exceptions, the prohibition on self-treatment is imperative; it applies to all physicians, even when the physicians requiring care have all the knowledge they would need to provide optimal treatment to patients consulting them for the same conditions.

There is also the spirit of the Code of Ethics, the spirit of objectivity that informs good medical practice. Merging the roles of physician and patient removes all professional distance and results in subjectivity. This provision is in the section of the Code of Ethics that deals with professional independence and impartiality, 2 aspects that contribute to the quality of medical services we deliver to patients.

Underlying risks

Self-treatment also involves the use of prescribing privileges for purposes other than those for which provision is made in the statutes, that is, to treat patients. Pharmacists’ duty to fill prescriptions completes physicians’ ability to prescribe, with both professionals acting in patients’ best interests. A pharmacist, who is subject to his own code of ethics, cannot associate himself with self-prescribing, which alters the very nature of the medical act. Self-treatment can involve more than simply self-prescribing, and obtaining medication from a pharmacist. It can also involve dipping into drug samples or procuring them from a pharmaceutical representative. Another form of self-treatment consists of requiring a colleague to blindly sign-off on a prescription or writing one outside the context of a formal consultation.

With self-treatment, there is the risk of bypassing a medical workup and missing an important diagnosis and medical follow-up. It is the opposite of the old saying: “If you want something done well, do it yourself.” Basically, a physician who self-prescribes is depriving himself of the optimal situation for reaching the proper diagnosis and receiving the best treatment. The medical process, the investigation, the examination, and the analysis of the results of the investigation must pass through the filter of knowledge but also of objectivity before any conclusions can be reached regarding diagnosis and treatment. It is acknowledged that the ethical ban on self-treatment extends to self-investigation.2 In the field of mental health in particular, a physician who treats himself is depriving himself of the benefits of consultation and psychotherapy, which, in some cases, obviates the need for medication.

Naturally, physicians report that it is difficult to consult other physicians for a variety of reasons, such as lack of time, fear of being turned away, unwillingness to bother another physician, fear of potentially exposing their weaknesses, the challenge of asking for help, denial, and so on. But physicians must help each other. This is not only desirable; it is enshrined in the Code of Ethics as a supplementary requirement to the notification to the College of a physician deemed unfit to practise: any physician must come to the assistance of colleagues with health issues that could affect the quality of their practice.1

When it involves the treatment of pain, self-prescription carries another risk: that of developing a drug dependency, a condition that physicians must guard against continuously. The problem is that, when it hurts, physicians tend to start with a substance that is disproportionately strong: we use a cannon instead of a fly swatter. Many, if not most, physicians live with several risk factors for the development of drug addictions: access to medication, high levels of stress, the desire for strong sensations, professional burnout, and self-treatment of pain.3

Bottom line

Based on my experience at the Collège des médecins du Québec, I can attest to the appropriateness of the rule against self-treatment. I have seen that, when it is not followed, physicians can get into terrible situations. While it does not occur too widely, thank goodness, the abuse of prescribing privileges can lead to fraud. One example is prescribing a medication for another person, such as a relative or patient, with the goal of obtaining the medication for oneself, either at a lower cost or to hide the self-prescription. The abuse of medications, whether benzodiazepines, analgesics, or other psychotropic substances, poses a very real and serious risk. Physicians who develop addictions are drawn into a downward spiral that affects every aspect of their lives: work, family, finances, and personal health, despite all their own efforts and those of their families and the other professionals involved.

To sum up, the medical community must take a clear stand on self-treatment. We need to say “No, we cannot!” rather than Barack Obama’s slogan, “Yes, we can!” to what some consider an inherent right.

Notes

CLOSING ARGUMENTS

  • Medical ethics prohibit self-treatment, with certain exceptions.

  • Self-treatment deprives physician-patients of the objectivity crucial to a high-quality clinical process and of the empathy of a consulting physician.

  • A physician who treats himself puts himself at risk, including at risk of drug addiction.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 784.

  • The parties in this debate refute each other’s arguments in rebuttals available at www.cfp.ca. Go to the full text of this article on-line, click on CFPlus in the menu at the top right-hand side of the page. Join the discussion by clicking on Rapid Responses.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵

    Code de déontologie des médecins (du Québec); article 70; R.R.Q. 1981 c. M-9, r. 4.1. Available from: www.publicationsduquebec.gouv.qc.ca.

  2. ↵

    Genest v Médecins (T.P.); 700-07-000002-071; 2008 Oct 29 (decision upheld upon judicial review).

  3. ↵
    HemEStokkeGTyssenRGrønvoldNTVaglumPEkebergØSelf-prescribing among young Norwegian doctors: a nine-year follow-up study of a nationwide sample [abstract]BMC Med2005316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 55 (8)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 55, Issue 8
1 Aug 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should family physicians treat themselves or not?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Should family physicians treat themselves or not?
Suzanne Richer
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2009, 55 (8) 781-782;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Should family physicians treat themselves or not?
Suzanne Richer
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2009, 55 (8) 781-782;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Underlying risks
    • Bottom line
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • CFPlus
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Should doctors treat themselves or not?
  • Le médecin de famille devrait-il se traiter lui-même ou non?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Self-prescribed and other informal care provided by physicians: scope, correlations and implications
  • "No" supports "Yes"
  • How to treat a physician-patient
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Should peanut be allowed in schools?
Show more Debates

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire