Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticlePractice

Intensive glycemic control

Implications of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT trials for family physicians

Gauranga Chandra Dhar
Canadian Family Physician August 2009, 55 (8) 803-804;
Gauranga Chandra Dhar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Research question

How does intensive glycemic control affect cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Relevance to family physicians

Type 2 diabetes is an important health problem all over the world. The incidence of CV events is 2 to 4 times higher in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes. Approximately 80% to 90% of people with diabetes are primarily managed by family physicians, in Canada and around the world. Owing to results of recent trials, family physicians should make sure their knowledge is up-to-date to ensure better glycemic management.

We have long known that intensive glycemic control reduces diabetes-related complications, including CV events. Some studies, like the DCCT (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial)1 and the UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study),2 have clearly shown a direct relationship between glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and incidence of CV disease, and that intensive glycemic control might lead to reduction in risk of all CV events, including nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and sudden death. On the basis of these and other trials, both the Canadian Diabetes Association and the American Diabetes Association recommend HbA1c levels below 7%.

In 3 recently published trials—ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes),3 ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation),4 and VADT (Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial)5—intensive glycemic control did not have any favourable effect on CV risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes, which has led to physicians modifying control of hyperglycemia in this population.

ACCORD trial

The ACCORD trial began in 2001 and included 3 different approaches, 1 of which was to determine how intensive glucose-lowering strategies act on CV outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes by assessment of HbA1c levels. There were 10 251 participants, with an average age of 62 years. Average duration of diabetes was 10 years, and the average baseline HbA1c level was 8.1%. Participants were divided into 2 groups. One group received intensive glucose control with HbA1c target levels below 6%; the other group followed a standard regimen with HbA1c target levels of 7% to 7.9%.

The study was halted in February 2008 owing to the increased fatality rate in the intensive-control group. The data analyses showed that in an average of 3.5 years of treatment (range 2 to 7 years), a total of 257 participants in the intensive-control group and 203 in the standard-control group died; this suggests that intensive glucose control increased death by 22%. Among the 460 total deaths, 229 were due to CV causes—135 in the intensive-control group and 94 in the standard-control group; that is a 35% higher rate of death due to CV causes in the intensive-control group. More episodes of serious hypoglycemia were found among patients following the intensive regimen (10%) than among those following the standard regimen (3.5%). Deaths due to CV disease in this trial were related to severe hypoglycemia.

ADVANCE trial

The ADVANCE trial was started in June 2001 and completed in March 2008. The objective was to identify the relationship between intensive glycemic control and microvascular and macrovascular outcomes. There were 11140 participants with type 2 diabetes. The average duration of disease was 8 years, and the average baseline HbA1c level was 7.2%. Average age was 66 years. Patients were divided into intensive-control and standard-control groups, with HbA1c goals of 6.3% and 7.0%, respectively.

There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality, including CV mortality, between groups. Major microvascular complications were reduced significantly in the intensive-control group (P = .01); however, no macrovascular risk reductions were found. Significantly more episodes of severe hypoglycemia were found in the intensive-control group: 2.7% compared with 1.5% in the standard-control group (P < .001).

VADT trial

During a 5.6-year follow-up in the VADT trial, 1791 participants (average age 60 years, average duration of diabetes of 11.5 years, mean baseline HbA1c level 9.4%) were divided into intensive- and standard-control groups.

There were more deaths due to CV causes in the intensive-control group than there were in the standard-control group (38 vs 29, respectively; sudden deaths 11 vs 4, respectively). More episodes of hypoglycemia were found in the intensive-control group than in the standard-control group (21% vs 10%, respectively).

Analysis of methodologies

These trials were large, rigorous, well-conducted randomized trials with meaningful clinical outcomes; however, they were of shorter duration and enrolled generally older patients than previous studies such as the DCCT and the UKPDS. Patients had had diabetes for longer and were at higher risk of CV events than patients in earlier studies. Further, the strategies used to achieve intensive glycemic control in these studies varied and often included multiple medications and interventions. The way in which risk factors are modified is important; the type and number of treatments used to modify risk factors shape the strategy’s effect on patient outcomes.6 The treatments might have had effects other than the intended effects on CV risk factors.

Hypoglycemia and major vascular events

Patients with type 2 diabetes are always prone to elevated CV risk. Subgroup analyses of ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VADT, with a total of 23 182 participants, failed to establish that intensive glucose-lowering strategies reduce CV events. Study results showed very intensive glucose control might be associated with frequent episodes of severe hypoglycemia and deaths from CV events.

In healthy individuals acute hypoglycemia provokes sympathoadrenal activation and counter regulatory hormonal secretion. This mechanism plays an important role in protecting the brain from neuroglycopenia through altering blood flow in the brain and other metabolic changes to restore blood glucose to normal. In healthy individuals this does not cause any detrimental effects. In patients with diabetes who have already developed endothelial dysfunction, acute hypoglycemia leads to acute hemodynamic and hematologic changes, which ultimately lead to increased risk of tissue ischemia and major vascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke. The possible mechanisms include release of inflammatory cytokines, white cell activation, and vasoconstriction.

Application to clinical practice

The benefits of intensive glycemic control on microvascular and macrovascular complications are well established in patients with type 2 diabetes and in those with type 1 diabetes. Physicians should note the following conclusions drawn as a result of ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT, and other observational studies. The general target of HbA1c levels below 7% should remain the same. Patients who have not had type 2 diabetes for long and who do not have established atherosclerotic disease might derive CV benefit from intensive glycemic control. Patients with very long duration of type 2 diabetes, known history of severe hypoglycemia, advanced atherosclerosis, and advanced age might not get CV benefit from intensive glycemic control. Physicians should be vigilant about this contingent of patients with diabetes to avoid hypoglycemia and should not attempt stringent glycemic control to achieve near-normal HbA1c levels, which cannot be safely achieved. For some high-risk patients, glycemic targets should be individualized. For primary and secondary CV risk reduction, clinicians should give special attention to smoking cessation, dietary, and physical activity counseling; following evidence-based recommendations for blood pressure control with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers and lipid-lowering therapy with statin and aspirin prophylaxis; and recommending other healthy lifestyle and behavioural changes.

Notes

BOTTOM LINE

  • The general target of HbA1c levels < 7% should remain the same. Targets should be individualized for patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors.

  • Patients who have not had type 2 diabetes for long and who do not have established atherosclerotic diseases might derive cardiovascular benefit from intensive glycemic control.

  • Physicians should encourage cardiovascular risk reduction through smoking cessation, dietary, and physical activity counseling; following evidence-based recommendation for blood pressure control with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers and lipid-lowering therapy with statin and aspirin prophylaxis; and recommending other healthy lifestyle and behavioural changes.

POINTS SAILLANTS

  • L’objectif général de maintenir le taux de HbA1c à < 7 % devrait rester le même. Les seuils à viser devraient être individualisés pour les patients qui ont des facteurs de risques cardiovasculaires additionnels.

  • Les patients qui n’ont pas le diabète de type 2 depuis longtemps et qui n’ont pas de maladie athéroscléreuse établie pourraient bénéficier sur le plan cardiovasculaire d’un strict contrôle glycémique.

  • Les médecins devraient encourager la réduction des risques cardiovasculaires en donnant des conseils pour cesser de fumer, bien s’alimenter et faire de l’activité physique; en suivant les recommandations fondées sur des données probantes pour contrôler l’hypertension au moyen d’inhibiteurs de l’enzyme de conversion de l’angiotensine ou d’antagonistes des récepteurs de l’angiotensine II, et d’une thérapie hypolipidémiante et de l’aspine par prévention; et en recommandant d’autres changements pour un mode de vie et des comportements sains.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research GroupThe effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitusN Engl J Med19933291497786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) GroupIntensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33)Lancet1998352913183753
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study GroupGersteinHCMillerMEByingtonRPGoffDCJrBiggerJTEffects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetesN Engl J Med200835824254559Epub 2008 Jun 6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    ADVANCE Collaborative GroupPatelAMacMahonSChalmersJNealBBillotLIntensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetesN Engl J Med200835824256072Epub 2008 Jun 6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    DuckworthWAbrairaCMoritzTRedaDEmanueleNReavenPDGlucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetesN Engl J Med2009360212939Epub 2008 Dec 18
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    KrumholzHMLeeTHRedefining quality—implications of recent clinical trialsN Engl J Med20083582425379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 55 (8)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 55, Issue 8
1 Aug 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intensive glycemic control
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Intensive glycemic control
Gauranga Chandra Dhar
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2009, 55 (8) 803-804;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Intensive glycemic control
Gauranga Chandra Dhar
Canadian Family Physician Aug 2009, 55 (8) 803-804;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Research question
    • Relevance to family physicians
    • ACCORD trial
    • ADVANCE trial
    • VADT trial
    • Analysis of methodologies
    • Hypoglycemia and major vascular events
    • Application to clinical practice
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Skin-derived precursors from human subjects with Type 2 diabetes yield dysfunctional vascular smooth muscle cells
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Is 45 the new 50 in colorectal cancer screening?
  • Approach to diagnosis and management of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
  • Determining if and how older patients can safely stay at home with additional services
Show more Practice

Critical Appraisal

  • Effectiveness of omalizumab in severe persistent asthma under real-life conditions
  • New therapy for managing moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Four-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Show more Critical Appraisal

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire