Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Review ArticlePractice

Office management of urinary incontinence among older patients

Christopher Frank and Agata Szlanta
Canadian Family Physician November 2010; 56 (11) 1115-1120;
Christopher Frank
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: frankc@pccchealth.org
Agata Szlanta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To provide family physicians with a guide to office management of urinary incontinence (UI) among older patients.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane database were searched using the terms urinary incontinence, stress incontinence, overactive bladder, urge incontinence, elderly, and geriatrics.

MAIN MESSAGE A variety of conditions affecting the nervous system and the lower urinary tract can affect bladder function and UI. Among older patients the effects of decreased cognition and impaired mobility can be substantial, and environmental barriers can play a role. When managing older patients with UI, emphasis on treating concurrent conditions, optimizing medications, and working on lifestyle and behavioural factors is at least as important as pharmacologic treatment. Medications are relevant, but the potential for adverse effects increases among older patients.

CONCLUSION Various resources are available to support family physicians in office management of UI, and family physicians can improve symptoms and the quality of patients’ lives by screening for and helping patients to manage incontinence.

Case

Mrs M.A. is an 84-year-old lady with mild Alzheimer dementia. She lives at home and is cared for by her 87-year-old husband. They come in together for an appointment, and he comments that his wife’s urinary incontinence (UI) is worsening and is causing increased caregiver stress.

She has had occasional incontinence for more than 5 years, but during the past 6 months she has had at least 3 episodes of urine loss daily, at least 1 of these during the night. He is doing more laundry than before, and they are restricting social activities to minimize embarrassment.

Mrs M.A. minimizes the concern and reports only occasional urine loss. She is independent in self-care but needs assistance with shopping and complex meal preparation. She was started on donepezil 7 months ago and is currently taking 10 mg daily. She also takes 30 mg of extended-release nifedipine daily and 25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide daily for hypertension, 81 mg of enteric-coated acetylsalicylic acid, and 30 mg of oxazepam at bedtime as needed for sleep.

Urinary incontinence is a challenging clinical condition to treat in family medicine. Although it is common, many family physicians have received minimal training in management. Patients underreport the presence of UI and physicians do not commonly ask about it in routine questioning, leading to undertreatment. A survey of family physicians in 20021 found that only 37% of respondents thought they had an organized approach to management, and a similar percentage reported feeling comfortable with management. Almost 50% of respondents managed patients by making referrals, most commonly to urology. Knowledge of resources such as Nurse Continence Advisors was minimal. Despite these concerns, it has been shown that family physicians can improve symptoms and quality of life for those with UI.2

Although UI is not part of “normal aging,” it is common in older patients. Almost 20% of home-care clients in a Canadian sample had incontinence, and this increases to 25% of older hospital patients and up to 50% of nursing home residents.3,4

This paper will focus on management in older, frail patients, although the basic management principles hold true for all patients.

Sources of information

Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane database were searched from January 2000 to August 2010 using the terms urinary incontinence, stress incontinence, overactive bladder, urge incontinence, elderly, and geriatrics. Relevant review articles and original research were used when appropriate.

Main message

Causes of incontinence

A variety of conditions affecting the nervous system and the lower urinary tract can affect bladder function. In older patients the effects of decreased cognition and impaired mobility can be substantial, and environmental barriers can play a role. Table 1 outlines a commonly used classification system and conditions affecting the pathways that control continence.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Classification system and conditions affecting the pathways that control continence

Assessment in the office

Mrs M.A. describes small-volume urine loss with coughing or laughing, but also reports loss of moderate volumes of urine (enough to drip down her leg) if she “doesn’t get to bathroom right away” (within 2 minutes) when she starts to get the urge. She occasionally wakes up wet and needs to go to the toilet immediately upon awakening. She drinks a cup of coffee in the morning and 3 cups of tea between lunch and bedtime. She does not use alcohol or smoke. During the past month she has substantially restricted her fluid intake, and her husband tries to remind her to go to the bathroom several times throughout the day.

Clinicians should consider whether a patient’s UI is recent or chronic, as the possible causes can differ. A mnemonic used with transient incontinence is presented in Box 1. A UI evaluation is difficult to do in one visit in the office setting, and it might be helpful to break down the evaluation into different visits with older patients who have more difficulty with history and physical examination maneuvers. The Rational Clinical Examination series has reviewed approaches to clarifying the causes of incontinence5 and provides an additional resource for family physicians.

Box 1.

DIAPPERS mnemonics for transient causes of urinary incontinence

Delirium

Infection

Atrophic vaginitis

Pharmaceuticals

Psychological

Excessive urine output (eg, hyperglycemia, hypercalcemia)

Reduced mobility or Retention

Stool impaction

History is not always straightforward, and in the frail elderly it might not correlate well with the causative mechanism. A 3-item questionnaire (3IQ), which asks questions about if, when, and how often patients experience urine leaks, used in combination with a urinalysis has been shown to identify and reasonably accurately categorize UI in middle-aged to elderly women.6 Other questionnaires are available for older patients.7–9 Clarifying obstetrical and surgical history is relevant, especially with stress or overflow UI. Strategies tried by the patient can provide insight into the mechanism and treatment options to use. Questions related to lifestyle, especially caffeine and fluid intake, are important, and use of a bladder diary can help develop management strategies. The Geriatric Interprofessional Interorganizational Collaboration website has a helpful tool kit with many of these resources.10

Concurrent conditions common in older patients, such as Parkinson disease, stroke, heart failure, sleep apnea, and diabetes, can all affect bladder function. Constipation will also impair bladder emptying, and in a frail patient can precipitate overflow incontinence due to retention.11

Physical examination is controversial, and the type of examination required depends on the clinical setting. Older patients’ overall cognitive and functional status is often known to family physicians but can be assessed further by observation and by specific mobility and cognitive assessments. An abdominal examination is relevant, as is examining for conditions affecting fluid redistribution such as venous insufficiency or heart failure. A lower-extremity neurologic examination should be considered, especially in cases of urgency or overflow without clear cause. Perineal sensation and rectal tone should be checked.5,11–13

There is little evidence or clarity on the extent of pelvic examination that is necessary in the family medicine office. Although a full speculum examination with bimanual examination is ideal to check mucosal integrity and degree of prolapse, this is not always possible with frailer patients. The role of the family physician might be more to rule out prolapse that requires obvious surgical consideration. If a more complete pelvic examination is a barrier to providing care in a busy office with a frail patient, then it seems reasonable to visually rule out severe prolapse and atrophy, then do the full pelvic examination or refer the patient if initial management is not helpful.11 Checking for circumvaginal muscle strength is relevant and might guide pelvic floor exercises.12,13

In older patients, prescribed and over-the-counter medications can have considerable effects on bladder function and should be considered an essential part of the evaluation. Table 2 lists common medications and their mechanisms of affecting bladder function.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2

Common medications and their mechanisms of affecting bladder function

Mrs M.A. is able to get out of a chair and walk safely with a Timed Up and Go test14 of 3 metres in 12 seconds. She recently scored 22 out of 30 on the Mini-Mental State Examination. Results of her basic physical examination are unremarkable, but a stress maneuver (having the patient cough or do Valsalva maneuver in a supine position with a full bladder) does reveal urine loss. There is moderate atrophy and a small rectocele and circumvaginal strength is weak. Postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume done by in-and-out catheterization is 120 mL. Urine dip results show moderate leukocytes but no blood or nitrites.

Postvoid residual volume is a very important measure in UI assessment, but it can be a challenge to obtain in a family medicine practice. Bladder scanners are convenient but expensive, and their accuracy varies with the experience of the user and with patient characteristics. Bladder scanners might be feasible in group practices or family health teams where they are shared among several physicians. In-and-out catheterization requires training and increases the risk of infection. Some authors suggest that for patients without substantial risk factors, abdominal examination and bladder percussion can suffice, at least initially.11 Our experience is that patients without clear risks sometimes have surprisingly high PVR volumes, especially in hospitals and institutions, and whenever possible measuring the volume is relevant. When it is impossible to obtain the PVR volume, failure to respond to initial therapy should be a cue to seek outside assessment. A normal PVR volume is less than 100 mL,13 but less than 200 mL suggests that retention or overflow incontinence is not a main contributing factor.

Urine dip should be done to look for local irritants causing hematuria and urge incontinence. In the absence of symptoms, routine use of urine culture in older patients with established incontinence is not recommended, and treating otherwise asymptomatic urinary tract infections has been shown to be ineffective (at least among nursing home patients) at improving UI.15

Treatment

In older patients, emphasis on treating concurrent conditions, optimizing medications, and working on lifestyle and behavioural factors is at least as important as pharmacologic treatment. Medications are relevant, but the potential for adverse effects beyond dry mouth (eg, falls, urinary retention, cognition changes) increases among older patients. Pharmacologic treatment of UI is outlined in Table 3.16

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3

Pharmacologic treatment of urinary incontinence

Lifestyle choices, such as alcohol or coffee consumption, can have a much greater effect on older people who have concurrent cognition or physical barriers to getting quickly and safely to a toilet. For this reason reduction and preferably elimination of caffeinated beverages and minimization of alcohol intake is recommended as a primary step. Patients often restrict fluid intake, but concentration of urine can irritate the urinary tract and accentuate bladder irritability, so fluids should only be restricted after supper to minimize nocturia.

Cochrane reviews have not found adequate evidence to recommend for or against behavioural strategies such as timed voiding, habit retraining, and prompted voiding. However, when caregivers and patients are willing to participate, regular scheduling of toileting based on the clock or based on usual voiding habits should be considered. For patients with dementia, an every-2-hours schedule can be helpful, but this might not be possible if staffing is limited in residential facilities or if the patient will not tolerate it.17–19

Pelvic floor exercises should be considered even with very elderly patients if they are motivated and have the cognitive ability to learn and remember.20 Although developed for stress incontinence, there is evidence that urgency might improve with improved pelvic floor strength. A summary of how to discuss pelvic floor exercises can be found in a 2003 Canadian Family Physician article21 and in the Geriatric Interprofessional Interorganizational Collaboration tool kit.10 The optimal way to educate patients is by referral to a physiotherapist with interest in pelvic floor rehabilitation or to a Nurse Continence Advisor. Although these resources are not available in most areas in Canada, verbal feedback on the effectiveness of the patient’s response provided during physical examination can be as effective as biofeedback, so family physicians and office nurses can still provide benefit.22

Patients with urge incontinence might benefit from anticholinergic agents. As noted, the most common side effect is dry mouth, but older patients can experience substantial cognitive effects even with long-acting preparations and with the newer agents. There is some evidence that long-acting preparations are better tolerated,23 and these are increasingly available on provincial formularies. Use of anticholinergic agents should not be considered without lifestyle and behavioural modification efforts with older patients, given the potential side effects.11,19 If patients have minimal response to anticholinergic agents, it is wise to consider stopping the drug after an adequate trial of at least 1 month rather than continuing indefinitely, given the increased risk of cognitive adverse effects as people become frailer over time.

Initiating anticholinergics in patients with dementia must be done with caution and should be avoided unless nonpharmacologic treatments are unhelpful and a trial is desired by patients. Some provincial formularies will not cover cholinesterase inhibitors in patients taking anticholinergic bladder agents.

Estrogen has a somewhat controversial role in UI management. A Cochrane review found that oral estrogen actually increased incontinence but that topical estrogen should be considered in the treatment of urge and stress incontinence.24 Local estrogen can be delivered by cream intravaginally or periurethrally, which is not always easy for older patients or their caregivers to apply. Estrogen rings might be better tolerated and are easily prescribed from a family medicine office.

During the past few years, the role of pessaries for UI and prolapse has changed, and family physicians commonly fit and care for patients using pessaries. They should be considered for women with symptomatic prolapse and have been shown to be effective for stress UI. Several reviews in Canadian Family Physician provide information for readers.25,26

The appropriate use of protective undergarments is also important. Older patients commonly use inadequate strategies such as tissue paper or panty liners for considerable urine loss. Use of a full brief might contribute to functional problems if the patient is unable to remove them quickly enough at the toilet. Ensuring that patients are asked what they are using is an important part of the history. A Nurse Continence Advisor or medical equipment store might be able to provide helpful advice on product use.

Criteria for specialist referral are mostly based on consensus with little research evidence; they are summarized in Box 2.11,27,28

Box 2.

When to consider referral of an older patient with incontinence for further urologic, gynecologic, or urodynamic evaluation11,27,28

Consider referral for older patients who have ...

  • had surgery or pelvic floor radiation within the past 6 mo

  • incontinence associated with recurrent symptomatic urinary tract infections

  • postvoid residual volumes greater than 200 mL

  • unexplained hematuria

  • incontinence with new-onset neurologic symptoms, muscular weakness, or both

  • persistent bothersome symptoms after trials with behavioural treatment, drug treatment, or both

  • pelvic pain associated with incontinence

  • pelvic organ prolapsed past the introitus or symptomatic pelvic prolapse

  • inability to tolerate or lack of response to a pessary or other adjunctive treatment

  • substantial prostate enlargement, prostate nodule, induration of lobes, or asymmetry

  • difficulty passing a 14-Fr straight urinary catheter

Conclusion

Mrs M.A. stops drinking coffee and takes 1 cup of tea in the morning. Although she still restricts fluids before car trips and after supper, she does not aggressively restrict intake at other times. She continues to take donepezil, as she believes there has been good benefit even with the risk of increasing bladder activity. Her bedtime sedation is minimized, and her nifedipine discontinued in case it contributed to increased PVR volume. Hydrochlorothiazide is switched to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. She works hard at Kegel exercises and uses them with moderate success for urge suppression. A trial of long-acting tolterodine results in mild confusion that is frightening for her and is discontinued. Overall, she is pleased with the decrease in frequency of UI episodes (to about 2 per week) and notes she is usually up 1 less time at night.

Notes

EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

  • Urinary incontinence (UI) is a challenging clinical condition to treat in family medicine. Although it is common, many family physicians have received minimal training in management. Patients underreport the presence of UI and physicians do not commonly ask about it in routine questioning, leading to undertreatment.

  • Assessing elderly patients with UI might require more than one visit. A comprehensive history (including surgical and obstetrical history, cognitive function, lifestyle factors, and concurrent conditions), physical examination, evaluation of medications, urine dip, and postvoid residual volume measurement, if possible, should be completed.

  • Addressing lifestyle choices and physical barriers, behavioural strategies, pelvic floor exercises, appropriate protective undergarments, pessary insertion, and medications can all play a role in the treatment of older patients with UI. Referral might be necessary for patients not responding to these treatments; other referral criteria are outlined by the authors.

POINTS DE REPÈRE DU RÉDACTEUR

  • En médecine familiale, traiter l’incontinence urinaire (IU) peut s’avérer difficile. Même s’il s’agit d’une condition clinique fréquente, plusieurs médecins de famille n’ont pas été formés adéquatement pour y faire face. Les patients n’en parlent pas facilement et le médecin néglige souvent de poser des questions à ce sujet, de sorte que l’IU n’est pas suffisamment traitée.

  • L’évaluation de l’incontinence urinaire chez le patient âgé pourrait exiger plus d’une visite. Si possible, il faut faire un historique détaillé (incluant les antécédents chirurgicaux et obstétricaux, l’état cognitif, les facteurs liés au mode de vie et les maladies concurrentes), un examen physique, une revue de la médication, un examen d’urine par bâtonnet et une mesure du résidu post-mictionnel.

  • Pour traiter l’IU chez la personne âgée, il importe de considérer les choix de mode de vie et les obstacles physiques, les stratégies comportementales, les exercices du plancher pelvien, les sous-vêtements protecteurs, l’insertion de pessaire et la médication En cas d’échec du traitement, une consultation en spécialité peut être nécessaire; les auteurs mentionnent d’autres critères de référence.

The Care of the Elderly series was developed as an initiative of the Continuing Professional Development Committee of the Canadian Geriatrics Society in collaboration with Canadian Family Physician to provide articles on geriatric topics written by family physicians for family physicians.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Cet article a fait l’objet d’une révision par des pairs.

  • This article is eligible for Mainpro-M1 credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro link.

  • Contributors

    Dr Frank and Dr Szlanta contributed to the literature search and to preparing the article.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Swanson JG,
    2. Skelly J,
    3. Hutchison B,
    4. Kaczorowski J
    . Urinary incontinence in Canada. National survey of family physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Can Fam Physician 2002;48:86-92. Erratum in: Can Fam Physician 2008;54:28.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Seim A,
    2. Hermstad R,
    3. Hunskaar S
    . Female urinary incontinence: long-term follow-up after treatment in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1998;48(436):1731-4.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Mohide EA,
    2. Pringle DM,
    3. Robertson D,
    4. Chambers LW
    . Prevalence of urinary incontinence in patients receiving home care services. CMAJ 1988;139(10):953-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    1. Roe B
    1. Mohide EA
    . The prevalence of urinary incontinence. In: Roe B, editor. Clinical nursing practice, the promotion and management of incontinence. London, Engl: Prentice-Hall; 1992. p. 1-17.
  5. ↵
    1. Holroyd-Leduc JM,
    2. Tannenbaum C,
    3. Thorpe KE,
    4. Straus SE
    . What type of urinary incontinence does this woman have? JAMA 2008;299(12):1446-56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Brown JS,
    2. Bradley CS,
    3. Subak LL,
    4. Richter HE,
    5. Kraus SR,
    6. Brubaker L,
    7. et al
    . The sensitivity and specificity of a simple test to distinguish between urge and stress urinary incontinence. Ann Intern Med 2006;144(10):715-23.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bradley CS,
    2. Rovner ES,
    3. Morgan MA,
    4. Berlin M,
    5. Novi JM,
    6. Shea JA,
    7. et al
    . A new questionnaire for urinary incontinence diagnosis in women: development and testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192(1):66-73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kirschner-Hermanns R,
    2. Scherr PA,
    3. Branch LG,
    4. Wetle T,
    5. Resnick NM
    . Accuracy of survey questions for geriatric urinary incontinence. J Urol 1998;159(6):1903-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Sandvik H,
    2. Hunskaar S,
    3. Vanvik A,
    4. Bratt H,
    5. Seim A,
    6. Hermstad R
    . Diagnostic classification of female urinary incontinence: an epidemiological survey corrected for validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48(3):339-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Geriatrics Interprofessional Interorganizational Collaboration [website]
    . Incontinence. Geriatrics Interprofessional Interorganizational Collaboration; 2010. Available from: www.rgpc.ca/best/GiiC%20Resources/GiiC/incontinence.html. Accessed 2010 Oct 6.
  10. ↵
    1. Goode PS,
    2. Burgio KL,
    3. Richter HE,
    4. Markland AD
    . Incontinence in older women. JAMA 2010;303(21):2172-81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Abrams P,
    2. Cardozo L,
    3. Khoury S,
    4. Wein A
    1. Abrams P,
    2. Andersson KE,
    3. Brubaker L,
    4. Cardozo L,
    5. Cottenden A,
    6. Denis L,
    7. et al
    . Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Plymouth, MA: Health Publication Ltd; 2005. p. 1767-818.
  12. ↵
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    . Urinary incontinence women. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105(6):1533-45.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Podsiadlo D,
    2. Richardson S
    . The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39(2):142-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Ouslander JG,
    2. Schapira M,
    3. Schnelle JF,
    4. Uman G,
    5. Fingold S,
    6. Tuico E,
    7. et al
    . Does eradicating bacteriuria affect the severity of chronic urinary incontinence in nursing home residents? Ann Intern Med 1995;122(10):749-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Jensen B,
    2. Reiger L
    1. Lee M,
    2. Jensen B,
    3. Regier L
    . Urinary incontinence charts. In: Jensen B, Reiger L, editors. RxFiles: drug comparison charts. 8th ed. Saskatoon, SK: Saskatoon Health Region; 2010. p. 48-9.
  16. ↵
    1. Ostaszkiewicz J,
    2. Johnston L,
    3. Roe B
    . Habit retraining for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(2):CD002801.
    1. Ostaszkiewicz J,
    2. Johnston L,
    3. Roe B
    . Timed voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(1):CD002802.
  17. ↵
    1. Shamliyan TA,
    2. Kane RL,
    3. Wyman J,
    4. Wilt TJ
    . Systematic review: randomized, controlled trials of nonsurgical treatments for urinary incontinence in women. Ann Intern Med 2008;148(6):459-73. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Hay-Smith EJ,
    2. Bø Berghmans LC,
    3. Hendriks HJ,
    4. de Bie RA,
    5. van Waalwijk van Doorn ES
    . Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(1):CD001407.
  19. ↵
    1. O’Neil B,
    2. Gilmour D
    . Approach to urinary incontinence in women. Diagnosis and management by family physicians. Can Fam Physician 2003;49:611-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Burgio KL,
    2. Goode PS,
    3. Locher JL,
    4. Umlauf MG,
    5. Roth DL,
    6. Richter HE,
    7. et al
    . Behavioral training with and without biofeedback in the treatment of urge incontinence in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288(18):2293-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Van Kerrebroeck P,
    2. Kreder K,
    3. Jonas U,
    4. Zinner N,
    5. Wein A,
    6. Tolterodine Study Group
    . Tolterodine once-daily: superior efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of the overactive bladder. Urology 2001;57(3):414-21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Cody JD,
    2. Richardson K,
    3. Moehrer B,
    4. Hextall A,
    5. Glazener CM
    . Oestrogen therapy for urinary incontinence in post-menopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(4):CD001405.
  23. ↵
    1. Bordman R,
    2. Telner D
    . Pessary insertion. Choosing appropriate patients. Can Fam Physician 2007;53:424-5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Bordman R,
    2. Telner D,
    3. Jackson B,
    4. Little D
    . Step-by-step approach to managing pelvic organ prolapse. Information for physicians. Can Fam Physician 2007;53:485-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Canadian Urological Association
    . Incontinence guidelines. Montreal, QC: Canadian Urological Association; 2010. Available from: www.cua.org/guidelines_e.asp. Accessed 2010 Oct 6.
  26. ↵
    1. Gibbs CF,
    2. Johnson TM 2nd.,
    3. Ouslander JG
    . Office management of geriatric urinary incontinence. Am J Med 2007;120(3):211-20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 56 (11)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 56, Issue 11
1 Nov 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Office management of urinary incontinence among older patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Office management of urinary incontinence among older patients
Christopher Frank, Agata Szlanta
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2010, 56 (11) 1115-1120;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Office management of urinary incontinence among older patients
Christopher Frank, Agata Szlanta
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2010, 56 (11) 1115-1120;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Case
    • Sources of information
    • Main message
    • Assessment in the office
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Challenges and achievements in caring for the elderly
  • Défis et accomplissements dans les soins aux personnes âgées
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Parkinson disease primer, part 2: management of motor and nonmotor symptoms
  • Abecedaire de la maladie de Parkinson, partie 2 : prise en charge des symptomes moteurs et non moteurs
  • Defis et accomplissements dans les soins aux personnes agees
  • Challenges and achievements in caring for the elderly
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
  • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
  • Spontaneous pneumothorax in children
Show more Practice

Clinical Review

  • Top studies of 2024 relevant to primary care
  • Approach to steatotic liver disease in the office
  • Foreskin care
Show more Clinical Review

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire