Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleResearch

Screening for type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes

Family physician and patient perspectives

Erin Keely, Heather Clark, Alan Karovitch and Ian Graham
Canadian Family Physician June 2010; 56 (6) 558-563;
Erin Keely
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ekeely@ottawahospital.on.ca
Heather Clark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Karovitch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Graham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Baseline demographics of study participants, comparing survey responders with nonresponders: A) physicians, B) patients.

    A)
    CHARACTERISTICRESPONDERS, N (%) N = 173NONRESPONDERS, N (%) N = 50TOTAL, N (%) N = 223
    Sex,*
      • Female115 (66.5)21 (42.0)136 (61.0)
      • Male58 (33.5)29 (58.0)87 (39.0)
    Year of graduation
      • Before 198580 (46.2)29 (58.0)109 (48.9)
      • In or after 198593 (53.8)21 (42.0)114 (51.1)
    Canadian graduate
      • Yes144 (83.2)31 (62.0)175 (78.5)
      • No29 (16.8)19 (38.0)48 (21.5)
    Received a reminder
      • Yes81 (46.8)31 (62.0)112 (50.2)
      • No92 (53.2)19 (38.0)111 (49.8)
    B)
    CHARACTERISTICRESPONDERS N = 140NONRESPONDERS N = 83TOTAL N = 223
    Mean (SD) age, y32.9 (4.2)33.3 (4.8)NA
    Primigravida, n (%)
      • Yes43 (30.7)27 (32.5)70 (31.4)
      • No97 (69.3)56 (67.5)153 (68.6)
    Mean (SD) BMI, kg/m227.9 (7.09)29.9 (8.9)
    Some postsecondary education, n (%)
      • Yes115 (82.1)67 (80.7)182 (81.6)
      • No25 (17.9)16 (19.3)41 (118.4)
    White, n (%)
      • Yes82 (58.6)55 (66.3)137 (61.4)
      • No58 (41.4)28 (33.7)86 (38.6)
    Requiring insulin, n (%)
      • Yes56 (40.0)35 (42.2)91 (40.8)
      • No84 (60.0)48 (57.8)132 (59.2)
    Baby weight > 4000 g, n (%)
      • Yes16 (11.4)16 (19.3)32 (14.3)
      • No124 (88.6)67 (80.7)191 (85.7)
    Received a reminder, n (%)
      • Yes118 (84.3)39 (47.0)157 (70.4)
      • No22 (15.7)44 (53.0)66 (29.6)
    • BMI—body mass index, NA—not applicable, SD—standard deviation.

    • ↵* P < .05, χ2 test.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Reasons physicians provided for not screening their patients for T2DM post partum: N=63.*

    REASONRECEIVED REMINDER (N = 22)DID NOT RECEIVE REMINDER (N = 40)
    Did not see patient in the postpartum period1013
    Saw patient in postpartum period, but did not arrange testing219
    Arranged testing, but it was not completed by the patient93
    Patient declined testing11
    Did not know the patient had GDM03
    • GDM—gestational diabetes mellitus, T2DM—type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    • ↵* Number of physician respondents who did not screen patients for T2DM.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Reasons patients gave for not completing screening for T2DM using OGTTs post partum: N=36.*

    REASONN
    Time pressures20
    Lost requisition7
    Did not know it was necessary2
    Pregnant again1
    Did self-glucose monitoring instead1
    Physician did not think it necessary1
    Physician did not suggest1
    Breastfeeding1
    Moved1
    Did not want to do it1
    • OGTT—oral glucose tolerance test, T2DM—type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    • ↵* Number of patient respondents who were not tested.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Physician and patient perspectives on who should provide screening post partum

    WHO SHOULD PROVIDE SCREENINGPHYSICIANS, N (%) N = 170*PATIENTS, N (%) N = 136†
    PCP110 (64.7)104 (76.4)
    Obstetrician20 (11.8)12 (8.8)
    Internist treating GDM16 (9.4)16 (11.8)
    PCP and obstetrician9 (5.3)2 (1.5)
    PCP and internist9 (5.3)2 (1.5)
    No answer or anyone6 (3.5)NA
    • GDM—gestational diabetes mellitus, NA—not applicable, PCP—primary care provider.

    • ↵* Number of physician respondents who answered the question.

    • ↵† Number of patient respondents who answered the question.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 56 (6)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 56, Issue 6
1 Jun 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Screening for type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Screening for type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes
Erin Keely, Heather Clark, Alan Karovitch, Ian Graham
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2010, 56 (6) 558-563;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Screening for type 2 diabetes following gestational diabetes
Erin Keely, Heather Clark, Alan Karovitch, Ian Graham
Canadian Family Physician Jun 2010, 56 (6) 558-563;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Follow-up after gestational diabetes: a qualitative study of perspectives from general practices
  • Barriers to postpartum diabetes screening: a qualitative synthesis of clinicians views
  • Coup d'œil sur l'avenir
  • A glimpse of the future
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary care reform in Alberta
  • Administrative burden in primary care
  • Burden of administrative responsibilities in primary care
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Collection française
    • Résumés de recherche

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire