Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
LetterLetters

Two years could be enough

J. Galt Wilson
Canadian Family Physician July 2010; 56 (7) 633;
J. Galt Wilson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

I very much enjoyed Dr Noel’s thoughtful, balanced commentary, which ultimately advocates a 3-year residency program.1

He does a very good job of canvassing the contrary position. I found his “Parkinson’s law” concern compelling—the risk that “the same material covered in a 2-year curriculum”1 might simply be spread over a longer period. The capacity challenges posed by any attempt to extend the duration of the program during this period of massive expansion of undergraduate enrolment make this inevitable in my view. As things currently stand, second-year residents (in British Columbia at least) are increasingly challenged to secure meaningful electives, such is the competition from the growing ranks of clinical clerks and specialty residents.

Then there are the twin pragmatic obstacles: governments have no money at present and, even allowing for the fact that “it would only be for 1 year,”1 a graduate hiatus in the current climate of perceived provider shortages is politically intolerable. Asking provinces to endorse a third year in this context is asking the impossible.

So, in the short-term at least, a 3-year program seems unlikely.

Fortunately, there is a workable alternative—even more aggressive promotion of group practice models. Even with the substantial improvements brought on by primary care reform initiatives, the work environment in our discipline (and most others) remains incompatible with the life aspirations of large numbers of new graduates, particularly young women with children. Recruitment to practice increasingly depends on accommodating young people. Business management responsibilities must be covered and specified hours of work guaranteed. More creatively, mentoring by more experienced colleagues needs to be part of the package.

Dr Noel appropriately concludes with a reference to “lessons of the past.” The slightly more distant past also holds some useful examples of what can be done to help inexperienced, younger colleagues. Many of our most respected older family medicine teachers came of age when postgraduate training included little or no formal curriculum—usually a rotating internship, followed by, for example, 6 months each of anesthesia and obstetrics. In clinical education parlance, “all service and no teaching.” Those doctors made the transition to “master clinician” competencies by joining supportive medical communities, often, but not always, based in clinic groups or small-town hospitals. Every working day began with an opportunity, over coffee in the medical staff lounge, to discuss cases with more experienced colleagues.

No one is advocating reverting back to laissez-faire learning. But it is a sad reality of the past 2 decades that family medicine has become more fragmented, despite explicit efforts to model team-based service provision in training. Communities of family physicians are working hard in many places to address that. The fruits of their efforts have the potential to re-create the on-the-job learning opportunities of the past, without the inhumane hours and expectations that are simply no longer acceptable.

While it is obviously true that 2-year trainees are not “master clinicians,” I question whether a third training year is the best way to solve that. Early practice experience in well-functioning groups has the potential to consolidate and build on one’s foundation of clinical skills, while, not incidentally, being paid as a real doctor.

I do acknowledge the “hunger” for third-year programs that Dr Noel cites. It is not new. My concern, however, is the extent to which so many of these programs lead new graduates away from generalist practice at a time in their professional lives when they need it as a key component of their professional formation and confidence. I would suggest mandating a minimum of 5 years of community general practice as a prerequisite for primary care subspecialty training (sports medicine, emergency medicine, palliative care, geriatrics, addictions, GP oncology, etc)—but that is another matter entirely!

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Noel K
    . Two years is not enough. Learning from the past, looking to the future. Can Fam Physician 2010;56:410-11, e167-8. Eng. (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 56 (7)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 56, Issue 7
1 Jul 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Two years could be enough
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Two years could be enough
J. Galt Wilson
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2010, 56 (7) 633;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Two years could be enough
J. Galt Wilson
Canadian Family Physician Jul 2010, 56 (7) 633;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • It's about time: 3-year FM residency training
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Collaboration required to fix “hidden curriculum”
  • Correction
  • Long-term monitoring needed for lichen sclerosus
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire