Submit a Response to This Article
Jump to comment:
No eLetters have been published for this article.
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Accelerating implementation of visual key information to improve informed consent in research: a single-institution feasibility study and implementation testing
- Palliative care in acute care surgery: research challenges and opportunities
- Genetics Navigator: protocol for a mixed methods randomized controlled trial evaluating a digital platform to deliver genomic services in Canadian pediatric and adult populations
- Testing of a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for extended postoperative thromboprophylaxis after major abdominal surgery for cancer
- Exploring the feasibility, acceptability and impact of genomic newborn screening for rare diseases in England: A study protocol for the Generation Study - Process and Impact Evaluation
- Clarifying misbeliefs about hydroxychloroquine (HCQ): developing the HCQ benefits versus harm decision aid (HCQ-SAFE) per low health literacy standards
- Patient decision aid for flozins in heart failure and ejection fraction greater than 40%
- Aide à la décision d'utiliser ou non les gliflozines pour l'insuffisance cardiaque avec fraction d'éjection supérieure à 40 %, à l'intention des patients
- Measures used to assess interventions for increasing patient involvement in Danish healthcare setting: a rapid review
- Increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making through a shared decision-making intervention (A231701CD): protocol for a cluster randomised clinical trial
- The impact of health literacy-sensitive design and heart age in a cardiovascular disease prevention decision aid: randomised controlled trial and end user testing
- A novel decision aid to help plan for serious illness: a multisite randomized trial
- 2019 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With High Blood Pressure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures
- Mesurer ce qui importe vraiment: Le dépistage en première ligne
- Can a patient-directed video improve inpatient advance care planning? A prospective pre-post cohort study
- Measuring what really matters: Screening in primary care
- Decision support intervention (Plan Well Guide) for patients and their substitute decision-makers to improve engagement in advance care planning: protocol for a randomised trial
- The COMET (Comparison of Operative versus Monitoring and Endocrine Therapy) trial: a phase III randomised controlled clinical trial for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
- Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating the comparative effectiveness of strategies to promote shared decision making for hip and knee osteoarthritis (DECIDE-OA study)
- PORTRAIT (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories): Overview of Design and Rationale of an International Prospective Peripheral Arterial Disease Study
- Effect of patient decision aid was influenced by presurgical evaluation among patients with osteoarthritis of the knee
- Discordance between patients' stated values and treatment preferences for end-of-life care: results of a multicentre survey
- Prise de décision partagée en soins de santé préventifs: Ce que c'est; ce que ce n'est pas
- Shared decision making in preventive health care: What it is; what it is not
- Development and Alpha-testing of a Stepped Decision Aid for Patients Considering Nonsurgical Options for Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Management
- Treatment Preferences for Active Surveillance versus Active Treatment among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer
- Shared Decision-Making Models Acknowledging an Interprofessional Approach: A Theory Analysis to Inform Nursing Practice
- Medical versus surgical methods of early abortion: protocol for a systematic review and environmental scan of patient decision aids
- Can shared decision making increase the uptake of evidence in clinical practice?