Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
  • Log out
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleResearch

Continuity of care is good for elderly people with diabetes

Retrospective cohort study of mortality and hospitalization

Graham Worrall and John Knight
Canadian Family Physician January 2011; 57 (1) e16-e20;
Graham Worrall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gworrall@mun.ca
John Knight
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To examine the relationship between continuity of family physician care and all-cause mortality and acute hospitalizations in older people with diabetes.

Design Retrospective cohort study of administrative health databases. Continuity of family physician care for elderly patients newly diagnosed with diabetes was estimated by 3 continuity indexes using physician claims data. The relationship of continuity of family physician care to mortality and acute hospitalizations was investigated.

Setting The province of Newfoundland and Labrador.

Participants A total of 305 family practice patients 65 years of age or older with diabetes.

Main outcome measures Death rate and hospitalization rate during a 3-year period.

Results Overall, continuity of family physician care was high. In the 3 years examined, the higher-continuity group had lower rates of hospitalization (53.5% vs 68.2%) and death (8.6% vs 18.5%) than the lower-continuity group.

Conclusion The findings suggest an association between higher continuity of family physician care and reductions in likelihood of death and hospitalizations in older people with diabetes.

Continuity of care is one of the defining principles of family medicine1,2; it is usually viewed as the relationship between a single practitioner and a patient that extends beyond single episodes of illness.3,4 Having a regular primary care provider is associated with better problem recognition, improved preventive care, improved patient satisfaction, reduced hospitalization and emergency department visits, and lower health care costs.5,6 A recent review, for example, found that health care costs were significantly lower when continuity was higher.7

Most of the work examining the relationship between continuity of care and patient outcomes has been done on pediatric8,9 or adult populations.10,11 Although elderly people have been found to value continuity of care more than younger people do12 and are more likely to have preventive procedures and checkups done,13,14 it is uncertain whether better continuity of care for older people is associated with better health outcomes. Also, there has been little investigation of the effects of continuity of care over time periods longer than 1 or 2 years.15,16

One of the most common health problems among the elderly is diabetes. In Canada, it is estimated that the number of individuals with diabetes will increase from 1.4 million in 2000 to 2.4 million in 2016, and that health care costs will increase by 80% in that time.17 The results of studies on the relationship between continuity and diabetes outcomes are conflicting, with some showing improvement18,19 and others showing no effect or a worsening of outcome.7,20

We conducted a study using secondary administrative databases to examine the relationship between 3 commonly used indices of continuity of care, death, and hospitalization in people 65 years of age or older with diabetes in Newfoundland and Labrador, the province with the highest prevalence of diabetes in Canada.21

METHODS

A sample of 350 people with diabetes, 65 years of age or older, was randomly selected from the Newfoundland and Labrador portion of the National Diabetes Surveillance System (NDSS) database. To be considered a diabetes case in the NDSS, an individual must have had 1 of the following: 1 hospital discharge with mention of diabetes; 2 medical services records with mention of diabetes not more than 2 years apart; or 1 medical services record followed by a hospital discharge, both with mention of diabetes, not more than 2 years apart. Gestational diabetes is excluded from the definition. The case date (the date on which the person becomes a case in the database) is the date of hospital discharge or the date of the first physician visit. The sample was selected such that all members had a case date falling within a fiscal year (1998–1999).

Database records for people with diabetes were linked using their provincial health insurance number to 3 administrative health databases, using SPSS 11.5 software. The 3 databases were the Medical Care Plan database, which is the provincial fee-for-service physician billing database; the Clinical Database Management System, which tracks acute hospitalizations; and the Mortality Surveillance System, which tracks all deaths occurring within the province. Information was obtained for each patient on all family physician contacts and all acute hospital discharges and deaths in a 3-year period after the diabetes case date.

Family physician visits from the Medical Care Plan database were used to calculate the usual provider continuity (UPC) index, a commonly used, well-validated index of continuity; it is a simple ratio of the number of visits to the most frequently visited provider, to the total number of visits to all providers. The index score was calculated for each patient; it produces a score ranging from 0 (lowest possible continuity) to 1 (highest possible continuity).22,23 Patients were divided into low- and high-continuity groups; high continuity was defined as an index value of 0.75 or greater, and low continuity was defined as less than 0.75, following the convention of a previous Canadian study.15

The outcome measures were the rates of mortality and the proportion of people having acute hospitalizations during the 3-year period.

Statistics

Descriptive statistics were used for the outcomes, as well as for the covariates of age, sex, and total number of physician visits. The χ2 test, the t test, or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to examine differences in outcomes and covariates between low- and high-continuity groups. Backward, conditional, binary multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between continuity of care index scores and each of the outcomes variables separately. The following predictors were entered into all models: age, sex, number of family physician visits, and continuity score (high or low for UPC). All analyses were done using SPSS 11.5.

The study protocol was approved by the Human Investigations Committee of Memorial University of Newfoundland.

RESULTS

Although all 350 people in the sample met the NDSS case definition for diabetes, only 305 (87.1%) had 2 or more fee-for-service family physician visits, and thus comprised the sample for whom continuity indices could be calculated. The mean (SD) age was 74.3 (6.7) years and 42.6% were men. In total 177 people (58.8%) had at least 1 acute hospitalization, and 39 (12.8%) died in the 3-year study period.

During the 3 years, the 305 patients visited fee-for-service family physicians 9117 times, with a mean of 29.9 visits per patient during the 3-year study period and 10.0 visits per patient per year. There were 471 acute hospitalizations in the study period, giving a mean of 1.5 hospitalizations per patient over the study period.

Table 1 shows the UPC score for 3 years; the score was skewed toward 1.0 with the top 50% of patients having perfect or near perfect continuity (0.9 or greater).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Usual provider continuity of care during a 3-year period: N = 305.

Table 2 shows some characteristics of the high- and low-continuity groups. Most elderly people with diabetes in this study had high continuity of care. Patients in the high-continuity group were significantly younger than those in the low-continuity group (P = 0.13), although the difference was small. Patients in the high-continuity group saw their family physicians more often, but the difference was small.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Characteristics of high- and low-continuity groups: N = 305.

Table 3 shows the proportions of the sample who died or had acute hospitalizations during the study period. The proportion of people dying was significantly lower in the high-continuity group (9.0% vs 18.1%, P = .025). The high-continuity group also had a significantly lower proportion of patients with at least 1 hospitalization (54.5% vs 67.5%, P = .027).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Proportion of sample deceased and proportion having acute hospitalizations during the 3-year period, by UPC continuity group: N = 305.

DISCUSSION

This was the first study to use administrative databases to examine the relationship between continuity of primary care provider and health care outcomes in Newfoundland and Labrador and, to our knowledge, the first in Canada to examine the relationship between continuity of primary care provider and mortality in people with diabetes.

People aged 65 and older with diabetes comprise a high-risk group; we found a 1 in 7 chance of death within 3 years of the diagnosis being made and a 1 in 2 chance of hospitalization. Despite known problems with administrative data, we found that it was feasible to calculate the UPC index of continuity. The UPC scores were high, as would be expected for a diabetic population with universal health care coverage. This has been found in previous studies of continuity of care for people with diabetes18,19; like these previous studies, we found that the distribution for the index was skewed toward 1.0, with 50% of patients having very high levels of continuity (0.9 or greater).

The association of higher continuity with a reduction in the likelihood of being hospitalized was similar to that found in other studies.7,10,17 We know of only 1 study that examined the association between continuity of care and mortality17; it found that continuity of primary care provider was associated with decreased mortality in mental health patients.

The observed reduction in hospitalization in the high-continuity group would most likely result in lower costs. Researchers have previously found that there is a general reduction in health care costs as continuity of care improves.23,24 As the number of older people with diabetes in Canada increases,17 cost factors will need to be considered.

Strengths and limitations

The study is the first to examine the relationship between continuity of care and mortality in elderly people with diabetes. The study was carried out on a random sample of people from administrative health databases, which were population-based and longitudinal, and it was longer than most other studies of continuity of care.

This study was limited by the fact that it retrospectively scanned existing databases. The data we used are now a decade old, and the situation might have changed. The study was also limited by the fact that the physician-visit database (Medical Care Plan), which provided data used to calculate the UPC index of family physician continuity, as well as specialist visit outcomes, tracked only fee-for-service physician visits. In Newfoundland and Labrador, approximately two-thirds of physicians are paid on a fee-for-service basis.25 The other third are salaried and are scattered outside urban centres; no information about their individual patient contact activities was available to us. Thus, the data most likely underestimate health care service utilization, especially in rural areas. In addition, although previous research has shown that health care service utilization and continuity of care are related to other important covariates such as socioeconomic status,15 we were unable to incorporate these variables into our models owing to the limited number of variables captured in the NDSS and physician claims databases.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest an association between higher continuity of family physician care and reductions in likelihood of death and hospitalizations in older people with diabetes. As the number of older people with diabetes in Canada increases, the benefits of continuity will become increasingly important.

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by grant number 203981 from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to Dr Worrall.

Notes

EDITOR’S KEY POINTS

  • Continuity of care is a defining principle of family medicine, and it has been shown to improve outcomes and decrease costs.

  • People aged 65 and older with diabetes comprise a high-risk group; the authors found a 1 in 7 chance of death within 3 years of the diagnosis being made and a 1 in 2 chance of hospitalization.

  • Overall there was a high level of continuity of care in the population studied. But those with higher continuity of care index scores were significantly less likely to experience hospitalization (P = .025) or death (P = .027) in the 3-year study period.

  • This study is the first to explore the relationship between continuity of care and mortality in elderly people with diabetes. It examined a random sample of people from administrative health databases, which were population-based and longitudinal, and it was longer than most other studies of continuity of care. However, the data used are now a decade old, and the study was only able to examine patients of fee-for-service physicians.

POINTS DE REPÈRE DU RÉDACTEUR

  • La continuité des soins est un principe fondamental de la médecine familiale; il a été démontré qu’elle améliore les issues tout en réduisant les coûts.

  • Les diabétiques de 85 ans et plus constituent un groupe à risque élevé; les auteurs ont observé qu’ils ont une chance sur 7 de mourir et 1 sur 2 d’être hospitalisés dans les 3 ans suivant le diagnostic.

  • Dans l’ensemble, il y avait un haut niveau de continuité des soins dans la population à l’étude. Toutefois, ceux qui avaient des scores plus élevés pour les indicateurs de suivi continu étaient significativement moins susceptibles d’être hospitalisés (P = ,025) ou de mourir (P = ,027) durant les 3 années de l’étude.

  • Cette étude est la première à étudier la relation entre continuité des soins et mortalité chez les diabétiques âgés. D’une durée supérieure à la plupart des études semblables, elle portait sur un échantillon aléatoire de patients provenant de bases de données administratives stratifiées et longitudinales sur la santé. Toutefois, les données utilisées datent déjà d’une dizaine d’années et l’étude ne portait que sur des patients de médecins rémunérés à l’acte.

Footnotes

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Cet article a fait l’objet d’une révision par des pairs.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Contributors

    Both authors contributed to concept and design of the study; data gathering, analysis, and interpretation; and preparing the manuscript for submission.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kelly L
    . Four principles of family medicine. Do they serve us well? Can Fam Physician 1997;43:1902-4, 1909-12. Eng. (Fr).
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. McWhinney IR
    . A textbook of family medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1997.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Hennen BK
    . Continuity of care in family practice. Part 1: dimensions of continuity. J Fam Pract 1975;2(5):371-2.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rogers J,
    2. Curtis P
    . The concept and measurement of continuity in primary care. Am J Public Health 1980;70(2):122-7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Starfield B
    . Primary care: balancing health needs, service and technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Saultz JW,
    2. Abedaiwi W
    . Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(5):445-51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Saultz JW,
    2. Lochner J
    . Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(2):159-66.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Butler JA,
    2. Winter WD,
    3. Singer JD,
    4. Wenger M
    . Medical care use and expenditure among children and youth in the United States: analysis of a national probability sample. Pediatrics 1985;76(4):495-507.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Alpert JJ,
    2. Robertson LS,
    3. Hosa J,
    4. Haggerty RJ
    . Delivery of health care for children: report of an experiment. Pediatrics 1976;57(6):917-30.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Gill JM,
    2. Mainous AG 3rd.
    . The role of provider continuity in preventing hospitalization. Arch Fam Med 1998;7(4):352-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sweeney KG,
    2. Gray DP
    . Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner—are they a vulnerable group? Br J Gen Pract 1995;45(392):133-5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Kearley KE,
    2. Freeman GK,
    3. Heath A
    . An exploration of the value of the personal doctor-patient relationship in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51(470):712-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Steven ID,
    2. Dickens E,
    3. Thomas SA,
    4. Browning E,
    5. Eckerman E
    . Preventive care and continuity of attendance. Is there a risk? Aust Fam Physician 1998;27(Suppl 1):S44-6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ettner SL
    . The relationship between continuity of care and health behaviors of patients: does having a usual physician make a difference? Med Care 1999;37(6):547-55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Menec VH,
    2. Sirski M,
    3. Attawar D
    . Does continuity of care matter in a universally insured population? Health Serv Res 2005;40(2):389-400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Reid RJ,
    2. Barer ML,
    3. McKendry R,
    4. McGrail KM,
    5. Prosser B,
    6. Green B,
    7. et al
    . Patient-focused care over time: issues related to measurement, prevalence, and strategies for improvement among patients populations. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2003. Available from: www.chsrf.ca/final_research/ogc/pdf/barer_final.pdf. Accessed 2006 Jan 20.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ohinmaa O,
    2. Jacobs P,
    3. Simpson S,
    4. Johnson JA
    . The projection of prevalence and cost of diabetes in Canada: 2000 to 2016. Can J Diabetes 2004;28(2):1-8.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Parchman ML,
    2. Puch JA,
    3. Noël PH,
    4. Larme AC
    . Continuity of care, self-management behaviors, and glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Med Care 2002;40(2):137-44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. O’Connor PJ,
    2. Desai J,
    3. Rush WA,
    4. Cherney LM,
    5. Solberg LI,
    6. Bishop DB
    . Is having a regular provider of diabetes care related to intensity of care and glycemic control? J Fam Pract 1998;47(4):290-7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gill JM,
    2. Mainous AG 3rd.,
    3. Diamond JJ,
    4. Lenhard MJ
    . Impact of provider continuity on quality of care for persons with diabetes mellitus. Ann Fam Med 2003;1(3):162-70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Statistics Canada
    . Diabetes, by sex, household population aged 12 and over, Canada, provinces, territories, health regions and peer groups. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2003. Available from: www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-221-x/2005002/status-etat/4150492-eng.htm. Accessed 2005 Jan 16.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Steinwachs DM
    . Measuring provider continuity in ambulatory care: an assessment of alternative approaches. Med Care 1979;17(6):551-65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Raddish M,
    2. Horn SD,
    3. Sharkey PD
    . Continuity of care: is it cost effective? Am J Manag Care 1999;5(6):727-34.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Weiss LJ,
    2. Blustein J
    . Faithful patient: the effect of long term physician patient relationships on the costs and use of health care by older Americans. Am J Public Health 1996;86(12):1742-7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador
    . Medical Care Plan annual report, 1999/00. St John’s, NL: Government of Newfoundland and Labrador; 2001.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 57 (1)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 57, Issue 1
1 Jan 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Continuity of care is good for elderly people with diabetes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Continuity of care is good for elderly people with diabetes
Graham Worrall, John Knight
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2011, 57 (1) e16-e20;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Continuity of care is good for elderly people with diabetes
Graham Worrall, John Knight
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2011, 57 (1) e16-e20;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The value of family medicine: An impossible job, done impossibly well
  • Patient experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in Dutch primary care
  • Determining the Association Between Continuity of Primary Care and Acute Care Use in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Having a Usual Source of Care Is Associated with Longer Telomere Length in a National Sample of Older Adults
  • Primary medical care continuity and patient mortality: a systematic review
  • Factors influencing patients preferences for their treating physician
  • Evaluating quality of overall care among older adults with diabetes with comorbidities in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study
  • Continuity of care with doctors--a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality
  • Relation between family physician retention and avoidable hospital admission in Newfoundland and Labrador: a population-based cross-sectional study
  • Towards research-based learning outcomes for general practice in medical schools: Inaugural Barbara Starfield Memorial Lecture
  • Continuity of care in primary care and association with survival in older people: a 17-year prospective cohort study
  • Depth of the patient-doctor relationship and content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Electronic consultation questions asked to addiction medicine specialists by primary care providers
  • Sociodemographic variation in use of and preferences for digital technologies among patients in primary care
  • Journey of a pill
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Collection française
    • Résumés de recherche

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire