Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • CFP AI policy
    • Politique du MFC en matière d'IA
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • CFP AI policy
    • Politique du MFC en matière d'IA
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticleResearch

A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake

Jill Tinmouth, Paul Ritvo, S. Elizabeth McGregor, Danielle Claus, George Pasut, Ronald E. Myers, Crissa Guglietti, Lawrence F. Paszat, Robert J. Hilsden and Linda Rabeneck
Canadian Family Physician January 2011; 57 (1) e7-e15;
Jill Tinmouth
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jill.tinmouth{at}sunnybrook.ca
Paul Ritvo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. Elizabeth McGregor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle Claus
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George Pasut
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald E. Myers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Crissa Guglietti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lawrence F. Paszat
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. Hilsden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Rabeneck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective To obtain data that could be used to optimize the content and design of the targeted, mailed invitations that Ontario’s provincewide colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program plans to use to increase screening uptake; to identify other strategies to increase CRC screening uptake; and to describe the effects of this qualitative work on a subsequent quantitative pilot study.

Design Qualitative study using semistructured focus groups.

Setting Four different Ontario communities.

Participants Six focus groups comprising a total of 62 participants.

Methods Six focus groups were conducted in 4 different Ontario communities. For 3 of the communities, participants were recruited from the general population by a private marketing firm, using random-digit dialing, and received a small honorarium for participating. In Sault Ste Marie, participants were convenience samples recruited from a large primary care practice and were not offered compensation. Responses were elicited regarding various strategies for promoting CRC screening. Findings represent all responses observed as well as recommendations to program planners based on focus groups observations.

Main findings Key themes identified included the importance of receiving a CRC screening invitation from one’s family physician; a desire for personalized, brief communications; and a preference for succinct information in mailed materials. Strong support was indicated for direct mailing of the CRC screening kit (fecal occult blood test). Our findings substantially influenced the final design and content of the envelope and letter to be mailed in the subsequent quantitative pilot study.

Conclusion We report strong support from our focus groups for a succinct, personalized invitation for CRC screening from one’s own family physician. We have also shown that qualitative evaluation can be used to provide decision makers with pertinent and timely knowledge. Our study is highly relevant to other public health programs, particularly other Canadian jurisdictions planning organized CRC screening programs.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 57 (1)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 57, Issue 1
1 Jan 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake
Jill Tinmouth, Paul Ritvo, S. Elizabeth McGregor, Danielle Claus, George Pasut, Ronald E. Myers, Crissa Guglietti, Lawrence F. Paszat, Robert J. Hilsden, Linda Rabeneck
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2011, 57 (1) e7-e15;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
A qualitative evaluation of strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake
Jill Tinmouth, Paul Ritvo, S. Elizabeth McGregor, Danielle Claus, George Pasut, Ronald E. Myers, Crissa Guglietti, Lawrence F. Paszat, Robert J. Hilsden, Linda Rabeneck
Canadian Family Physician Jan 2011, 57 (1) e7-e15;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • METHODS
    • FINDINGS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Equity and practice issues in colorectal cancer screening: Mixed-methods study
  • Personal Navigation Increases Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake
  • ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: Patient perceptions
  • ColonCancerCheck Primary Care Invitation Pilot project: Family physician perceptions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association between family physician gender and patient service times
  • Generalism as a cross-disciplinary practice in medicine
  • Uptake and feasibility of HPV self-sampling among patients of a Canadian family medicine clinic
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2026 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire