Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticleCollege

Continuity: middle C—a very good place to start

Jonathan Kerr, Allyn E. Walsh, Jill Konkin, David Tannenbaum, Andrew J. Organek, Ean Parsons, Danielle Saucier, Elizabeth Shaw and Ivy Oandasan
Canadian Family Physician November 2011, 57 (11) 1355-1356;
Jonathan Kerr
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Allyn E. Walsh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jill Konkin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Tannenbaum
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Organek
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ean Parsons
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle Saucier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Shaw
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ivy Oandasan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The College of Family Physicians of Canada has endorsed the recommendation from the Section of Teachers’ Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review that residency training programs should develop and implement a competency-based curriculum that is

  • comprehensive,

  • focused on continuity of education and patient care, and

  • centred in family medicine.

Together these recommendations form the Triple C Competency-based Curriculum (Triple C).1

This is the third in a series of articles explaining the Triple C initiative.2,3 Highlighted here is the middle C: continuity of education and patient care.

Continuity is key in the development of family physicians whose practices are truly patient-centred and comprehensive. Residency programs in family medicine must include both continuity of patient care and continuity of education for learners.

Continuity of patient care

Family medicine as a discipline defines itself in terms of relationships, and continuity of patient care is fundamental to the establishment of enduring relationships between patients and doctors.4 The benefits of continuity of care include increased efficiency of visits, improved health outcomes, enhanced trust, and increased satisfaction for both patient and physician.5–9 Hennen first described the concept of continuity of care as having 4 domains: chronologic or longitudinal, informational, geographic, and interpersonal.10 Since then, the concept has expanded to include family and interdisciplinary dimensions.11 The combination of these 6 domains of continuity contributes to the breadth and scope of family medicine. These domains are defined in Table 1.1

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

The concept of continuity of care

Teaching continuity of care in a 2-year family medicine residency program has many challenges. A true understanding of continuity of care often requires multiple patient-physician encounters, extended time to develop relationships, and opportunities for reflection and learning. A residency program designed exclusively around 1- or 2-month rotations in various medical disciplines lacks the structure to provide experiences needed for learners to master the concept of continuity of care and its importance in family medicine. Although many programs have attempted to address this by creating a “half-day back” for learners to return to their base family medicine clinic on a weekly basis while they are on other discipline-specific rotations, this strategy has created numerous logistical challenges. In many cases, both learners and the discipline-specific program directors view the “half-day back” as a barrier rather than a facilitator for learning in family medicine.1

Other family medicine programs have developed creative methods for increasing the development of a therapeutic relationship between the patient and resident. One such innovative method is the development of a patient panel that provides systematic means for the learner to follow the patient through all domains of care, including the patient visit to the emergency department, stay in the inpatient ward, visit to surgery, or appointment with a consulting specialist. Longitudinal relationships between learner and patient afford residents substantial advantages in learning about patients’ responses to illness over time, the natural history of disease, and the rewards of these long-term relationships. Still other programs have created a horizontal curriculum program structure whereby learners are engaged in a family medicine curriculum woven across the 2 years; learning and time spent in other specialties are considered necessary enhancements to a resident’s core learning of how to become a family physician. Providing learning that is centred in family medicine will be further discussed in an upcoming article in this series. Critical to the concept of continuity of care is the use of metrics in residency programs to measure and evaluate how effectively residents provide continuity of care to their patients. Further research in this area is needed.1

Continuity of education

Two key elements of continuity of education are continuity of supervision and continuity of the learning environment. (The third, continuity of curriculum, is beyond the scope of this article.) These elements support the development of a meaningful role for learners in patient care, promote increased resident responsibility over time, and facilitate effective, ongoing, formative feedback and coaching.1

Programs often set learners up for feeling incompetent every 4 to 12 weeks with each change of rotation. In most programs, a new rotation brings changes in the learning environment (who the players are, where the equipment is, what the work cycle and expectations are). Greater continuity in the educational program can lead to more satisfying and perhaps less disruptive experiences for residents.1,12

Continuity of supervision (preceptor)

Continuity of supervision, which includes teaching and assessment, is facilitated by assigning a small core of primary preceptors (1 to 3) to follow the resident through the entire residency. Although residents will interact with a much larger group of teachers, relationships between residents and their primary preceptors will build the trust and honesty necessary to foster authentic feedback and assessment.1

The ability to observe and assess growth over time allows teachers to more appropriately increase independence and autonomy (graded responsibility) for the learner. It facilitates building on skills and knowledge already mastered. The ongoing shared responsibility for patient care between learner and preceptor provides learners “with emotional comfort to take intellectual risks in their learning. At the same time, trusting relationships and shared goals foster coaching, promote effective feedback, and enhance clinical performance.”1,13

Continuity of the learning environment

Continuity of the learning environment refers to learning within a “bounded,” knowable community. Learners become familiar with the places and players in the care environment early in their training. Residents then have more time and energy to accomplish learning tasks when it is no longer necessary to become oriented to and learn about a substantially new environment every rotation. The environment includes not only the physical environment (eg, the hospital ward or clinic), but also the members of the health care team. Providing continuity of the learning environment allows residents a richer opportunity to develop relationships with other professionals, thus fostering interprofessional learning.1

Continuity of the learning environment can be a key facilitator of continuity of care and continuity of supervision. It fosters both patient- and learner-centredness. Learners in bounded learning environments become members of communities of practice, exposed to the expertise, values, and rewards of the profession. This helps them to build their professional identity as family physicians. The move to a curriculum centred in family medicine, with its emphasis on family medicine learning experiences, will promote continuity in the learning environment.1

Conclusion

Continuity of education and patient care is an important component of the Triple C Competency-based Curriculum. Look for the next installment in this series, which will discuss comprehensiveness. Have questions? Visit www.cfpc.ca/triple_C or contact triplec{at}cfpc.ca for more information.

Footnotes

  • La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la table des matières du numéro du novembre 2011 à la page e457.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. Tannenbaum D,
    2. Konkin J,
    3. Parsons E,
    4. Saucier D,
    5. Shaw L,
    6. Walsh A,
    7. et al
    . Triple C competency-based curriculum. Report of the Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review—part 1. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2011. Available from: www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Education/_PDFs/WGCR_TripleC_Report_English_Final_18Mar11.pdf. Accessed 2011 Jul 22.
  2. ↵
    1. Oandasan I,
    2. Working Group on Postgraduate Curriculum Review
    . Advancing Canada’s family medicine curriculum: Triple C. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:739-40, e237-8. (Eng),. (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Kerr J,
    2. Walsh A,
    3. Konkin J,
    4. Tannenbaum D,
    5. Organek A,
    6. Parsons E,
    7. et al
    . Renewing postgraduate family medicine education: the rationale for Triple C. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:963-4, e311-2. (Eng),. (Fr).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. McWhinney IR
    . A textbook of family medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1997.
  5. ↵
    1. Guthrie B,
    2. Wyke S
    . Personal continuity and access in UK general practice: a qualitative study of general practitioners’ and patients’ perceptions of when and how they matter. BMC Fam Pract 2006;24(7):11.
    OpenUrl
    1. Darden PM,
    2. Ector W,
    3. Moran C,
    4. Quattlebaum TG
    . Comparison of continuity in a resident versus private practice. Pediatrics 2001;108(6):1263-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ridd M,
    2. Shaw A,
    3. Salisbury C
    . ‘Two sides of the coin’—the value of personal continuity to GPs: a qualitative interview study. Fam Pract 2006;23(4):461-8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Saultz JW,
    2. Albedaiwi W
    . Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(5):445-51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Gray DP,
    2. Evans P,
    3. Sweeney K,
    4. Lings P,
    5. Seamark D,
    6. Seamark C,
    7. et al
    . Towards a theory of continuity of care. J R Soc Med 2003;96(4):160-6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Hennen BK
    . Continuity of care in family practice. Part 1: dimensions of continuity. J Fam Pract 1975;2(5):371-2.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Shires DB,
    2. Hennen BK,
    3. Rice DI
    1. Hennen BK
    . Continuity of care. In: Shires DB, Hennen BK, Rice DI, editors. Family medicine: a guidebook for practitioners of the art. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1987. p. 3-7.
  9. ↵
    1. Bernabeo EC,
    2. Holtman MC,
    3. Finsburg S,
    4. Rosenbaum JR,
    5. Holmboe ES
    . Lost in transition: the experience and impact of frequent changes in the inpatient learning environment. Acad Med 2011;86(5):591-8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hirsh DA,
    2. Ogur B,
    3. Thibault GE,
    4. Cox M
    . “Continuity” as an organizing principle for clinical education reform”. N Engl J Med 2007;356(8):858-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 57 (11)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 57, Issue 11
1 Nov 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Continuity: middle C—a very good place to start
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Continuity: middle C—a very good place to start
Jonathan Kerr, Allyn E. Walsh, Jill Konkin, David Tannenbaum, Andrew J. Organek, Ean Parsons, Danielle Saucier, Elizabeth Shaw, Ivy Oandasan
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2011, 57 (11) 1355-1356;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Continuity: middle C—a very good place to start
Jonathan Kerr, Allyn E. Walsh, Jill Konkin, David Tannenbaum, Andrew J. Organek, Ean Parsons, Danielle Saucier, Elizabeth Shaw, Ivy Oandasan
Canadian Family Physician Nov 2011, 57 (11) 1355-1356;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Continuity of patient care
    • Continuity of education
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • La continuité: le C du milieu - un très bon point de départ
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Why continuity matters: Ian McWhinney's insights for 21st-century medical education
  • Pourquoi la continuite est-elle si importante?: Reflexions d'Ian McWhinney sur l'education medicale au 21e siecle
  • Teaching the Triple C curriculum
  • Enseigner le Cursus Triple C
  • Triple C: a new vocabulary for a changing reality
  • Triple C: un nouveau vocabulaire pour une realite en evolution
  • Soins complets et globaux et formation
  • Comprehensive care and education
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

College

  • Collective effort: our key to success
  • L’effort collectif : la clé de notre réussite
  • La collégialité : le remède à la crise actuelle
Show more College

Triple C

  • Triple C: linking curriculum and assessment
  • Triple C : Établir une cohérence entre cursus et évaluation
  • Un cursus axé sur le développement des compétences pour la médecine de famille
Show more Triple C

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire