Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
Research ArticlePractice

Rate versus rhythm in atrial fibrillation

And how slow do you go?

G. Michael Allan, Christina Korownyk and Michael R. Kolber
Canadian Family Physician December 2011; 57 (12) 1411;
G. Michael Allan
MD CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina Korownyk
MD CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Kolber
MD CCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Clinical question

For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), how does attempting to control sinus rhythm compare with rate control, and what should the target heart rate be?

Evidence

  • Rate versus rhythm: Four meta-analyses1–4 with up to 5 trials compared rate and rhythm (N = 5239, mean age 69 years, 38% women, mean follow-up 3.1 years).1–3 Compared with those in the rhythm-control group, patients in the rate-control group

    • -had significantly fewer hospitalizations (54.7% vs 67.3%, P < .01, number needed to treat [NNT] = 8)3;

    • -had significantly reduced death, cardioembolic stroke, and intracranial hemorrhage (16.3% vs 18.6%, P = .03, NNT = 43)2—although individual end points did not reach statistical significance; and

    • -were less likely to be in sinus rhythm (eg, 35% vs 63% in the largest trial).1

  • Strict versus lenient rate: An RCT5 (N = 614, mean age 68 years, 66% men, 61% with CHADS2 scores between 0 and 1, followed for up to 3 years) compared strict rate control (resting heart rate target < 80 beats/min) and lenient rate control (resting heart rate target < 110 beats/min). Lenient rate control was not inferior to strict rate control in terms of a composite outcome (cardiovascular death, heart failure, hospitalization, stroke, systemic embolism, bleeds, life-threatening arrhythmia): 12.9% vs 14.9%, hazard ratio 0.84, 90% CI 0.58 to 1.21.

Context

  • Although historically it was thought that attempting to restore sinus rhythm was advantageous, medications used to establish and maintain sinus rhythm have risks.

  • Even in patients with coexistent congestive heart failure and AF, mortality and morbidity outcomes did not differ between rate and rhythm groups.6

  • Recent guidelines recommend rate control, particularly for elderly patients with minimal symptoms,7 and rhythm control for select patients.7 Strict rate control is not beneficial in those with stable ventricular function and no or acceptable symptoms.8

  • Regardless of the treatment strategy, antithrombotic therapy is a central part of AF management.7

Bottom line

Patients with persistent AF are more likely to benefit from rate control than rhythm control. Targeting resting heart rate to below 80 beats/min does not appear to be necessary. Regardless of the treatment strategy, antithrombotic therapy is central to AF management.

Implementation

Rate and rhythm control produce similar overall quality of life,3 but a recent observational study reported improved quality of life in patients with strict rate or rhythm control9 compared with those with uncontrolled rate or rhythm. A reasonable approach is to determine whether patients are symptomatic with AF. For most asymptomatic patients, rate control with a resting heart rate target below 110 beats/min is sufficient. For symptomatic patients, titrate the heart rate until symptoms improve, or consider rhythm control in appropriate candidates. Thrombotic risk should be calculated using a validated risk calculator (eg, CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc, which might be a better indicator of risk, particularly in those with intermediate CHADS2 scores).10

Notes

Tools for Practice articles in Canadian Family Physician are adapted from articles published twice monthly on the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP) website, summarizing medical evidence with a focus on topical issues and practice-modifying information. The ACFP summaries and the series in Canadian Family Physician are coordinated by Dr G. Michael Allan, and the summaries are co-authored by at least 1 practising family physician. Feedback is welcome and can be sent to toolsforpractice{at}cfpc.ca. Archived articles are available on the ACFP website: www.acfp.ca.

Footnotes

  • The opinions expressed in Tools for Practice articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily mirror the perspective and policy of the Alberta College of Family Physicians.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. ↵
    1. De Denus S,
    2. Sanoski CA,
    3. Carlsson J,
    4. Opolski G,
    5. Spinler SA
    . Rate vs rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2005;165(3):258-62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Testa L,
    2. Biondi-Zoccai GG,
    3. Dello Russo A,
    4. Bellocci F,
    5. Andreotti F,
    6. Crea F
    . Rate-control vs. rhythm-control in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2005;26(19):2000-6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Kumana CR,
    2. Cheung BM,
    3. Cheung GT,
    4. Ovedal T,
    5. Pederson B,
    6. Lauder IJ
    . Rhythm vs. rate control of atrial fibrillation meta-analysed by number needed to treat. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005;60(4):347-54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Caldeira D,
    2. David C,
    3. Sampaio C
    . Rate vs rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Intern Med 2011;22(5):448-55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Van Gelder IC,
    2. Groenveld HF,
    3. Crijns HJ,
    4. Tuininga YS,
    5. Tijssen JG,
    6. Alings AM,
    7. et al
    . Lenient versus strict rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2010;362(15):1363-73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Roy D,
    2. Talajic M,
    3. Nattel S,
    4. Wyse DG,
    5. Dorian P,
    6. Lee KL,
    7. et al
    . Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008;358(25):2667-77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fuster V,
    2. Rydén LE,
    3. Cannom DS,
    4. Crijns HJ,
    5. Curtis AB,
    6. Ellenbogen KA,
    7. et al
    . ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2006;114(7):e257-354.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Wann LS,
    2. Curtis AB,
    3. January CT,
    4. Ellenbogen KA,
    5. Lowe JE,
    6. Estes NA 3rd.,
    7. et al
    . 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (updating the 2006 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2011;123(4):104-23.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Steg PG,
    2. Alam S,
    3. Chiang CE,
    4. Gamra H,
    5. Goethals M,
    6. Inoue H,
    7. et al
    . Symptoms, functional status and quality of life in patients with controlled and uncontrolled atrial fibrillation: data from the RealiseAF cross-sectional international registry. Heart 2011 Sep 22. Epub ahead of print.
  10. ↵
    1. Olesen JB,
    2. Lip GY,
    3. Hansen ML,
    4. Hansen PR,
    5. Tolstrup JS,
    6. Lindhardsen J,
    7. et al
    . Validation of risk stratification schemes for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2011;342:d124.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 57 (12)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 57, Issue 12
1 Dec 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rate versus rhythm in atrial fibrillation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rate versus rhythm in atrial fibrillation
G. Michael Allan, Christina Korownyk, Michael R. Kolber
Canadian Family Physician Dec 2011, 57 (12) 1411;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Rate versus rhythm in atrial fibrillation
G. Michael Allan, Christina Korownyk, Michael R. Kolber
Canadian Family Physician Dec 2011, 57 (12) 1411;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Clinical question
    • Evidence
    • Context
    • Bottom line
    • Implementation
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

Practice

  • Managing type 2 diabetes in primary care during COVID-19
  • Effectiveness of dermoscopy in skin cancer diagnosis
  • Spontaneous pneumothorax in children
Show more Practice

Tools for Practice

  • Testosterone supplementation for men
  • Time to challenge penicillin allergy labels
  • Antibiotics for acute diverticulitis
Show more Tools for Practice

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2025 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire