Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticleDebates

Should we abandon the periodic health examination?

NO

Cleo A. Mavriplis
Canadian Family Physician February 2011, 57 (2) 159-161;
Cleo A. Mavriplis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: CMavriplis@bruyere.org
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

It is often difficult to dedicate time for preventive care in a busy family practice. Patients seem to consult their family doctors more for specific health complaints than for advice on prevention. The periodic health examination (PHE) is a tradition in North America; however, it is not used in most other countries, such as the United Kingdom, where preventive care is still delivered. Do we really need the PHE in Canada?

The PHE can advance 2 critical elements of care for our patients: relationship building and preventive care. A large systematic review of studies on the value of periodic health evaluation found that the PHE was consistently associated with an improved delivery of Papanicolaou tests, cholesterol screening, and fecal occult blood testing.1 The PHE was also found to decrease patient worry. A third of the studies reviewed were done before 1989, before large-scale dissemination of Canadian and American task force recommendations on preventive care. As the number of evidence-based preventive care recommendations grows, a PHE that offers a planned focus on preventive care might become even more valuable.

Time for prevention

Many provincial health care billing systems in Canada currently include a fee for an annual examination, a visit usually double the length of time of the average visit. Having more allotted time allows physicians to deal with their patients’ immediate concerns as well as to pursue other issues that might be neglected over the course of a year. Many physicians appreciate a longer visit to obtain a more holistic view of their patients, via discussions about family, work, and social life. These conversations build relationships, give context to medical issues, and provide opportunities to screen for less obvious conditions, such as depression (an evidence-based recommendation). A longer visit also provides time to inquire about exercise and lifestyle issues, as symptom-driven discussions at other visits might preclude this. A regularly scheduled health examination helps build important rapport and understanding, while enabling the delivery of preventive care; for healthy individuals, this is often the only contact they have with their family physicians.

A certain proportion of our patient population is already used to receiving PHEs, and many physicians have been informing patients of the new focus on preventive care. Taking advantage of an established cultural habit, we can piggyback much-needed preventive care onto these visits. Unfortunately, patients in lower socioeconomic groups2 and some other subsets of patients (eg, new immigrants,3 men,4,5 and African-American men6) are less likely to attend preventive care visits. Research is needed to ascertain how to reach these populations more effectively and include them in preventive care maneuvers. For those patients who do not welcome regularly scheduled PHEs, physicians should develop flexible approaches and pursue other opportunities for preventive screening and delivery of preventive care when appropriate

Some physicians feel overwhelmed or distracted by the long list of symptoms that patients often bring to the appointment. Learning to reframe the agenda with the patient has helped many learners manage these situations. Additionally, educating the patients in your practice with handouts explaining the PHE’s focus on prevention might help raise the profile of that aspect of the visit. Providing questionnaires for patients to fill out in the waiting room can streamline the process. I worked in a clinic where the patients completed a lifestyle questionnaire as well as a short functional inquiry before being seen by the doctor. I found this to be a time-saving measure, as a quick look helped me to identify areas to focus on and general patterns pointing to problems, such as anxiety or mental health concerns.

Although it is true that preventive care can be delivered well without the PHE, or can be carried out by nonphysician members of primary care teams, it is nonetheless a valuable tool. If considering eliminating the PHE, physicians should review what else they have in place to meet the need for preventive care and health promotion. Similarly, physicians should consider what opportunities will be provided to ensure that building relationships and working to put patients’ care issues into context are not continually overshadowed by the pressing concerns of that day.

Use what works

One size does not fit all. If a longer appointment for preventive services and holistic care does not work well for certain patients or family physicians, they should be free to use a different system. But don’t throw out the baby with the bath water—if the PHE works for many patients and physicians, why abandon it? To improve delivery of the PHE, we need to educate patients on the importance of a dedicated visit for preventive maneuvers. We need to educate family physicians on how to deliver focused, cost-effective, periodic health assessments. Additional research is needed to assess the costs, benefits, and harms, as well as long-term outcomes, of the PHE and to compare it with alternative methods of delivering preventive medicine within the primary care environment.

Acknowledgments

I thank Dr Sharon Johnston and Ms Linda Mavriplis for their comments on earlier drafts of this article. I also thank Health Services at the University of Ottawa for the idea of the patient questionnaire with functional inquiry.

Notes

CLOSING ARGUMENTS

  • The periodic health examination increases the delivery of preventive health care.

  • The longer visit provides a more holistic view of the patient.

  • Using an established cultural habit, we can piggyback much-needed preventive care maneuvers onto these visits.

  • Research is needed to improve the delivery of preventive care to certain groups of patients.

Footnotes

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page 165.

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • The parties in this debate refute each other’s arguments in rebuttals available at www.cfp.ca. Join the discussion by clicking on Rapid Responses.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Boulware LE,
    2. Marinopoulos S,
    3. Phillips KA,
    4. Hwang CW,
    5. Maynor K,
    6. Merenstein D,
    7. et al
    . Systematic review: the value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med 2007;146(4):289-300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Calle EE,
    2. Flanders WD,
    3. Thun MJ,
    4. Martin LM
    . Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health 1993;83(1):53-60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lofters A,
    2. Glazier RH,
    3. Agha MM,
    4. Creatore MI,
    5. Moineddin R
    . Inadequacy of cervical cancer screening among urban recent immigrants: a population-based study of physician and laboratory claims in Toronto, Canada. Prev Med 2007;44(6):536-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Viera AJ,
    2. Thorpe JM,
    3. Garrett JM
    . Effects of sex, age, and visits on receipt of preventive healthcare services: a secondary analysis of national data. BMC Health Serv Res 2006;6:15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Green CA,
    2. Pope CR
    . Gender, psychosocial factors and the use of medical services: a longitudinal analysis. Soc Sci Med 1999;48(1):1363-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hammond WP,
    2. Matthews D,
    3. Corbie-Smith G
    . Psychosocial factors associated with routine health examination scheduling and receipt among African American men. J Natl Med Assoc 2010;102(4):276-89.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 57 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 57, Issue 2
1 Feb 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
Cleo A. Mavriplis
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2011, 57 (2) 159-161;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
Cleo A. Mavriplis
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2011, 57 (2) 159-161;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Time for prevention
    • Use what works
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Rebuttal: Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
  • Rebuttal: Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
  • Réfutation: Devrions-nous abandonner l’examen médical périodique?
  • Réfutation: Devrions-nous abandonner l’examen médical périodique?
  • Devrions-nous abandonner l’examen médical périodique?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Physical examination in patient-centred care: Is the pendulum swinging too far the other way?
  • Comprehensive preventive care assessments for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Part 2: 2003 to 2014
  • Periodic preventive health visits: a more appropriate approach to delivering preventive services: From the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care
  • Visites medicales preventives periodiques : une meilleure prestation des services de prevention: Par le Groupe detude canadien sur les soins de sante preventifs
  • Health care expectations in Newfoundland
  • Finding a better balance for the periodic health examination
  • Preventive health care, not examination
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Should peanut be allowed in schools?
Show more Debates

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2023 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire