Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums

User menu

  • My alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
The College of Family Physicians of Canada
  • Other Publications
    • http://www.cfpc.ca/Canadianfamilyphysician/
    • https://www.cfpc.ca/Login/
    • Careers and Locums
  • My alerts
The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Archive
    • Supplemental Issues
    • Collections - French
    • Collections - English
  • Info for
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Advertisers
    • Careers & Locums
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
  • About CFP
    • About CFP
    • About the CFPC
    • Editorial Advisory Board
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
  • Feedback
    • Feedback
    • Rapid Responses
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • Email Alerts
  • Blogs
    • Latest Blogs
    • Blog Guidelines
    • Directives pour les blogues
  • Mainpro+ Credits
    • About Mainpro+
    • Member Login
    • Instructions
  • RSS feeds
  • Follow cfp Template on Twitter
Research ArticleDebates

Rebuttal: Should we abandon the periodic health examination?

YES

Micheal Howard-Tripp
Canadian Family Physician February 2011, 57 (2) e42;
Micheal Howard-Tripp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mhtripp@shaw.ca
  • Article
  • eLetters
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Dr Mavriplis states that it is often difficult to dedicate time for preventive care in a busy family practice. According to McWhinney,1 if every patient in a practice of 2000 had a 20-minute annual health examination, it would occupy the physician full-time for 22 weeks of every year. Another study estimated that more than 40% of all direct patient time for primary care physicians is taken up by dedicated preventive care visits.2 Discontinuing dedicated periodic health examinations (PHEs) would immediately provide substantially more time for regular patient care, including a few minutes for prevention at each visit, and would allow more people access to family physicians. It should be noted that the number of appointments dedicated to PHEs in 2009 (21.4 million, if you account for the fact that PHEs take twice as long) is more than all of the visits for hypertension (20.9 million) during the same period.3

Dr Mavriplis suggests that dedicated time for a PHE fosters the building of relationships and rapport, and allows the physician to place the patient’s medical concerns into context. One of the core tenets of family practice is cumulative consultation—the continual building of therapeutic relationships over a period of months or years. Every patient contact requires effective communication and understanding of the patient’s context, which is central to the patient-centred clinical method.1

Dr Mavriplis found that the PHE was consistently associated with the improved delivery of Papanicolaou tests, cholesterol testing, and fecal occult blood testing. However, Mehrotra et al2 have demonstrated that only 19.9% of 8 different preventive services occurred at PHEs or preventive gynecologic examinations, and that preventive care, in particular counseling services, frequently occurred at visits for immediate care or chronic illness. Despite the small benefits attributed to having dedicated PHEs, the delivery of evidence-based preventive care during the PHE is poor and there is still no convincing evidence that it leads to better health outcomes. I believe that there is still insufficient justification for the continued and substantial cost of the PHE to the Canadian health system, particularly as it should be easy to schedule patient-specific preventive care, using computerized systems, during visits for immediate care.

I agree with Dr Mavriplis that patient handouts and self-administered questionnaires can be useful. Providing a patient handout that explains why an “annual physical” is no longer provided and details which evidence-based preventive care maneuvers are generally recommended would prepare the patient for discussing these tests during regular care visits.

Acknowledgments

I thank Dr Jean Langley for her helpful comments during the preparation of this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests

    None declared

  • These rebuttals are responses from the authors of the debates in the February issue (Can Fam Physician 2011;57: 158,160 [Eng], 159,161 [Fr]).

  • Cet article se trouve aussi en français à la page e44.

  • Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. McWhinney IR
    . A textbook of family medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1997. p. 197.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Mehrotra A,
    2. Zaslavsky AM,
    3. Ayanian JZ
    . Preventive health examinations and preventive gynecological examinations in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2007;167(17):1876-83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. IMS Health
    . Top 10 reasons for physician visits in Canada. Canadian disease and therapeutic index. Montreal, QC: IMS Health; 2009. Available from: www.stacommunications.com/journals/cpm/2010/04-April-2010/CPM_035.pdf. Accessed 2010 Dec 14.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Family Physician: 57 (2)
Canadian Family Physician
Vol. 57, Issue 2
1 Feb 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on The College of Family Physicians of Canada.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rebuttal: Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from The College of Family Physicians of Canada
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the The College of Family Physicians of Canada web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Rebuttal: Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
Micheal Howard-Tripp
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2011, 57 (2) e42;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Rebuttal: Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
Micheal Howard-Tripp
Canadian Family Physician Feb 2011, 57 (2) e42;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
  • Should we abandon the periodic health examination?
  • Réfutation: Devrions-nous abandonner l’examen médical périodique?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Comprehensive preventive care assessments for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Part 2: 2003 to 2014
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Will the new opioid guidelines harm more people than they help?
  • Should peanut be allowed in schools?
Show more Debates

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Collections - English
  • Collections - Française

For Authors

  • Authors and Reviewers
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Permissions
  • Terms of Use

General Information

  • About CFP
  • About the CFPC
  • Advertisers
  • Careers & Locums
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Subscribers

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feeds

Copyright © 2021 by The College of Family Physicians of Canada

Powered by HighWire