I was given an appropriate orientation to this rotation | 25 | 4.60 (0.645) | 16 | 4.44 (0.629) | .794 | 39 | .432 |
Main learning objectives were clearly described and followed | 25 | 4.32 (0.690) | 16 | 4.31 (0.602) | .036 | 39 | .972 |
The clinical experience allowed for the learning objectives to be met | 25 | 4.36 (0.907) | 16 | 4.44 (0.629) | −.298 | 39 | .767 |
A variety of patient problems representative of the discipline were seen | 25 | 4.36 (0.995) | 16 | 4.56 (0.629) | −.725 | 39 | .473 |
The rotation was well organized with efficient use of time | 25 | 4.04 (0.978) | 16 | 4.25 (0.931) | −.683 | 39 | .499 |
There were sufficient opportunities to participate in patient care and management | 25 | 4.32 (0.900) | 15 | 4.53 (0.640) | −.803 | 38 | .427 |
The length of the rotation was appropriate | 25 | 4.00 (0.957) | 16 | 4.62 (0.719) | −2.235 | 39 | .031 |
I was given support and positive reinforcement | 25 | 4.68 (0.557) | 16 | 4.69 (0.704) | −.038 | 39 | .970 |
I was given support by nursing and ancillary staff | 25 | 4.60 (0.645) | 16 | 4.56 (0.727) | .173 | 39 | .864 |
Textbooks, literature resources, and reading assignments were recommended to me | 26 | 4.28 (0.737) | 15 | 4.33 (0.976) | −.196 | 38 | .846 |
This rotation was educationally beneficial | 25 | 4.48 (0.770) | 16 | 4.69 (0.793) | −.832 | 39 | .411 |
Considering all aspects of this rotation, how would you rate its overall effectiveness? | 25 | 4.28 (0.843) | 16 | 4.44 (0.629) | −.641 | 39 | .525 |